Join Now | 
HomeAboutContact UsPrivacy & SecurityAdvertise
Soccer America DailySpecial EditionAround The NetSoccer Business InsiderCollege Soccer ReporterYouth Soccer ReporterSoccer on TVSoccer America Classifieds
Paul Gardner: SoccerTalkSoccer America ConfidentialYouth Soccer InsiderWorld Cup Watch
RSS FeedsArchivesManage SubscriptionsSubscribe
Order Current IssueSubscribeManage My SubscriptionRenew My SubscriptionGift Subscription
My AccountJoin Now
Tournament CalendarCamps & AcademiesSoccer GlossaryClassifieds
Post-Beckham Rule Questions
Fox Sports, November 20th, 2006 8:12PM

MOST READ

MOST COMMENTED

So Major League Soccer approved the so-called "Beckham Rule," which allows teams to acquire one player each beyond the $2 million per-team salary cap. Just imagine, if you will, being a teammate of either David Beckham, Ronaldo, or Luis Figo, knowing full well that your team is most likely paying him up to five times more than the rest of the squad combined. If you can adopt the team-league mentality that what's good for the league is good for everyone, then you might be able to understand that more than their ability, which is still very good but not that good, these players are being brought here to put people in the seats and get the league more media attention. But what does this designated player rule really mean? Nick Webster of Fox Sports, points out that the salary cap has proven to be successful in keeping down the costs of a startup league. Perhaps this new rule is a first step in the direction of letting teams control their finances. Of course, everyone is aware that letting the New York Cosmos have an unlimited budget is ultimately what bankrupted the league. That kind of irrational exuberance will not be repeated. We've heard countless stories about how big an impact David Beckham could have on MLS. His marketability alone is enough to perhaps to justify spending a massive amount of money on bringing him over here. But as Webster points out, there are also a number of stumbling blocks. One, for a player like Beckham, it's practically an admission that you're career is over. He's only 31, and Ronaldo is only 30; both may have more ambition than that. Then there's the tension that would arise between the Beckham class and their teammates, who would be earning far less. Also, would they be willing to travel in coach like the rest of MLS? David Beckham in coach? Highly unlikely. Read the original story...


No comments yet.

Sign in to leave a comment. Don't have an account? Join Now




AUTHORS

ARCHIVES
FOLLOW SOCCERAMERICA

Recent Section 2 Around the Net
Report: Real Beats Barca to Promising Youngster    
Real Madrid has beaten Barcelona to the signing of promising youngster Marco Asensio, in what Spanish ...
Guardiola Hopes Messi Stays at Barca     
Bayern Munich coach Pep Guardiola said he hopes "with all my heart" that Lionel Messi ends ...
Man City, Bayern Fans Persist with UEFA Protest    
PA Sport reports that Manchester City and Bayern Munich will continue their "Respect ... Fans" protest ...
Report: Sony to End FIFA Partnership     
Japanese consumer electronics giant Sony will become the second official FIFA sponsor to decide not to ...
Arsenal Fails to Register Giroud for UCL     
Arsenal striker Olivier Giroud will be forced to sit out the Gunners' crucial UEFA Champions League ...
Koeman: Saints Can Finish Top Four    
Southampton coach Ronald Koeman insists his team can remain in the Premier League's top four following ...
Mourinho Downplays Di Matteo's Chelsea Success     
Jose Mourinho refused to be drawn into a comparison with former Chelsea coach Roberto Di Matteo, ...
Report: Barca's Vermaelen May Need Surgery     
Goal.com reports that Barcelona defender Thomas Vermaelen could require surgery to cure the hamstring injury that ...
Messi's Top Ten Records    
Barcelona striker Lionel Messi, who became La Liga's all-time leading scorer (253 goals) following his hat ...
Rodgers Admits His Future Could be in Doubt     
Brendan Rodgers admitted that he could be fired after Liverpool slumped to a fourth successive defeat ...
>> Section 2 Around the Net Archives