Join Now  | 
Home About Contact Us Privacy & Security Advertise
Soccer America Daily Soccer World Daily Special Edition Around The Net Soccer Business Insider College Soccer Reporter Youth Soccer Reporter Soccer on TV Soccer America Classifieds Game Report
Paul Gardner: SoccerTalk Soccer America Confidential Youth Soccer Insider World Cup Watch
RSS Feeds Archives Manage Subscriptions Subscribe
Order Current Issue Subscribe Manage My Subscription Renew My Subscription Gift Subscription
My Account Join Now
Tournament Calendar Camps & Academies Soccer Glossary Classifieds
Champions League Finalists Carrying $3 Billion Of Debt
The Guardian, May 20th, 2008 2:45PM
Subscribe to Section 2 Around the Net

MOST READ

MOST COMMENTED

Is Manchester United really such a thriving company? David Conn lays out the amount of debt that the two English teams will be carrying into Wednesday's final. He says that the accounts of Chelsea Limited show that the club owes £736 million ($1.472 billion) to its creditors, while United's recently filed accounts show total creditors at £764 million ($1.528 million) for a total of around $3 billion between the two teams.
 
Chelsea owes its owner Roman Abramovich the lion's share at £578 million ($1.152 billion), which he put into the club as an interest free loan, but at least they don't owe "external debt" to any bank. Its chief executive, Peter Kenyon, says that with "the company being external debt free and our ownership clearly demonstrating continuing commitment to the long term, I am very confident about the future."
 
United, by contrast, owes £666 million ($1.332 billion) to financial institutions that was taken on by the Glazer family so that they could buy the club in 2005, "then loaded on to United itself." Much of the profit the club makes has to go into servicing the huge amounts of interest on those loans.  In that respect, Chelsea looks much better placed financially. "However," Conn writes, "there is no doubt that the club remains wholly reliant on 0520sect 2 continued funding. If the owner's enthusiasm were ever to wane, and Abramovich decided he did want his loan back, the accounts show that Chelsea would have 18 months to find the money."

Read the original story...



No comments yet.

Sign in to leave a comment. Don't have an account? Join Now




AUTHORS

    ARCHIVES
    FOLLOW SOCCERAMERICA

    Recent Section 2 Around the Net
    Youth soccer fights back against 49ers    
    Northern California youth soccer advocates, including Santa Clara Youth Soccer League President Tino Silva, have launched ...
    Cal South TOPSoccer Program Turns 25    
    "We're all soccer players, special needs or not," says Sandy Castillo, chair of the Cal South ...
    How Neymar Played in Childhood    
    Neyrmar: "I used to pick up the ball, set up the furniture and go around dribbling ...
    Roma Partnering with U.S. Youth Clubs    
    Italian Serie A club Roma, which has American ownership, aims to forge partnerships with seven U.S. ...
    LVG: Falcao "Has to Prove Himself"    
    Manchester United coach Louis van Gaal has responded to criticism over dropping Radamel Falcao by claiming ...
    Report: Adidas to Assist Messi Move?    
    According to Spanish sports daily AS, Lionel Messi's sponsor Adidas could be the key to the ...
    Toure Admits Man City Future in Doubt    
    Speaking ahead of the opening games of the African Nations' Cup in Equatorial Guinea this weekend, ...
    Ronaldo Blasts 'Defensive' Atleti Tactics    
    Cristiano Ronaldo blasted Atletico Madrid for its unattractive style after the Rojiblancos ousted Real Madrid from ...
    Fabian Johnson's 'Spat' with 'Gladbach Coach Favre    
    According to Bild, USA defender Fabian Johnson is in a "spat" with Borussia Monchengladbach coach Lucien ...
    Serie A to Introduce Goal-Line Technology    
    Serie A will introduce goal-line technology next season after the Italian soccer federation (FIGC) gave its ...
    >> Section 2 Around the Net Archives