Join Now | 
HomeAboutContact UsPrivacy & SecurityAdvertise
Soccer America DailySoccer World DailySpecial EditionAround The NetSoccer Business InsiderCollege Soccer ReporterYouth Soccer ReporterSoccer on TVSoccer America ClassifiedsGame Report
Paul Gardner: SoccerTalkSoccer America ConfidentialYouth Soccer InsiderWorld Cup Watch
RSS FeedsArchivesManage SubscriptionsSubscribe
Order Current IssueSubscribeManage My SubscriptionRenew My SubscriptionGift Subscription
My AccountJoin Now
Tournament CalendarCamps & AcademiesSoccer GlossaryClassifieds
Champions League final MVP award goes to ...
by Paul Gardner, May 22nd, 2008 7AM

TAGS:  uefa champions league


As we've more or less given up expecting great finals, Chelsea and Manchester United provided the sort of game we've gotten used to -- a Champions League final that was good, but not great.

Two teams with millions of dollars worth of attacking talent on the field, managed to give us only two goals, but the near misses -- particularly Chelsea's -- and a couple of saves -- from Chelsea again -- provided excitement.

As to the winner -- did Man U deserve their victory? Maybe -- though I can't honestly say that Chelsea deserved to lose. Anyway, we're talking about a win based on the infamous penalty kicks.

After 120 minutes of the real game, the championship was decided in less than 10 minutes of shootout activity. Does anyone really like the shootout? Maybe some people do -- I haven't met any of them -- but almost everyone admits that it is not the way to decide a game. Especially an important one.

Yet, given the fact that finals are likely to be tight, cautious -- and defensive -- games, the blight of a shootout looms large in such games. This was the fourth Champions League final in the last eight to be settled in this way. We also have a world champion, Italy, that claimed the title via a shootout.

I can find but one thing to say in praise of last night's penalty kicks: they were honest. I don't mean the kickers were honest -- they have little choice -- I mean the goalkeepers, Edwin Van der Saar and Petr Cech, managed to obey the rules.

Playing by the rules has not been a prominent feature of past champions' league shootouts. In 2003, the Milan keeper Dida engaged in flagrant cheating against Juventus, coming well off his line to save -- first from Marcelo Zalayeta and then, crucially, from Paolo Montero. Two years later, some sort of delayed justice struck, when Milan was on the receiving end of goalkeeper skulduggery, as Liverpool's Jerzy Dudek almost raced out of his goal to block Andrea Pirlo's kick. In both games, the referee -- not mention the assistants who are specially positioned to watch out for goalkeeper movement -- saw nothing wrong.

But last night, in Moscow's Luzhniki Stadium, things were different. It all came down to 20 seconds of referee Lubos Michel's time. There he was, with his assistant, talking to both goalkeepers, immediately before the shootout began. Well, true, I don't know what he was saying -- but I'd bet from the gestures he was making -- and from the impeccable behavior of the goalkeepers later, that he was letting them know that illegal movement would be punished.

Petr Cech saved Ronaldo's kick, and then Van der Saar sealed Man U's win with his save from Nicolas Anelka ... and both saves were legitimate, made without cheating.

That save of Van der Saar's inevitably led to yet another of the shootout's unsatisfactory consequences: headlines talking of him as the hero of the win, and his selection as the game's MVP. What nonsense. I counted one genuine save by him during the game; aside from Frank Lampard's goal, he was beaten twice but was lucky that the shots, by Didier Drogba and Lampard hit the woodwork. But he takes the award for a couple of seconds worth of what might well have been sheer guesswork.

The MVP award probably should have gone to one of the hard-working midfielders or defenders. It was that sort of a game, made even more of a grind by torrential game. It could have Michael Carrick or Michael Essien, or Ricardo Carvalho or Nemanja Vidic, all played their hearts out. But ... Van Der Saar?

The award was, strictly speaking, for Man of the Match. As it doesn't mention a player, I think I'd stretch a point and give it to referee Michel who handled difficult and explosive matters with calm authority throughout. In particular, he was not intimidated by Chelsea's repeated complaints, nor by their mobbing tactics, which in the end, cost them dear.

The incident that ended with Lubos ejecting Drogba seemed like an innocuous disagreement between John Terry and Carlos Tevez -- before, suddenly, Ballack and Lampard and, fatally, Drogba muscled their way into the fracas. When Drogba slapped Vidic in the face, that was the sad end of the night for him -- possibly a sad end to his career at Chelsea.

As Manchester United has pipped Chelsea to both the EPL and the Champions League titles, I'd say that makes it the better team. But on this night, I could see nothing to choose between them. The luck of the shootout said Manchester United.


  1. Heather Scott-molleda
    commented on: May 22, 2008 at 12:10 p.m.
    Essien for MVP? Wasn't he the defender who lost track of Ronaldo and was caught completely flat-footed as Ronaldo soared over him to score a tremendous header? I would vote for Cech based on his brilliant save, including in PKs. But don't discount van der Saar's efforts either, no matter how quickly they happened. Facing the pressure of PKs and still coming up with the big save at the crucial moment goes a long way to earning MVP honors.

Sign in to leave a comment. Don't have an account? Join Now



Recent SoccerTalk with Paul Gardner
The growth of the academies (Part 2): Is there any evidence that they are giving us better soccer?    
Evidence from a survey by the Switzerland-based Football Observatory (see Part 1) indicates that the number ...
The growth of the academies (Part 1): Institutes of Higher Learning for soccer -- is this really the way to go?     
Soccer academies. What a great idea! Fully-funded centers for the development of young players, superior facilities, ...
Arsenal: Why so few Latinos? Why so many injuries?    
Talk about predictable. Here they come again, Arsenal, going through a pretty good spell in the ...
A classic non-call of a blatant penalty kick foul    
Should Chelsea have had a penalty kick in the 86th minute of its game against Stoke ...
Did Jason Kreis Ever Have a Chance?     
I shall, until I see convincing evidence to the contrary, regard Jason Kreis not as a ...
Is soccer, thanks to GLT, becoming a game of millimeters?     
Baseball, they say, is a game of inches. While soccer, of course, is a game of ...
Thank you Jurgen, and goodbye. Again.    
That headline was used for a column of mine after World Cup 2014. When Klinsmann led ...
Time is running out on violent goalkeeping     
Employing former players as TV experts is now well established as the thing to do. Like ...
Joe Morrone: Soccer's Determined Pioneer    
Joe Morrone. I have quite a few memories of Joe, all of them pleasant and friendly. ...
Should PRO have revealed, during the game, that the Red Bull trick play was illegal?    
This really rather ridiculous business of the Red Bull corner-kick trickery continues to reverberate.
>> SoccerTalk with Paul Gardner Archives