Join Now | 
HomeAboutContact UsPrivacy & SecurityAdvertise
Soccer America DailySoccer World DailySpecial EditionAround The NetSoccer Business InsiderCollege Soccer ReporterYouth Soccer ReporterSoccer on TVSoccer America ClassifiedsGame Report
Paul Gardner: SoccerTalkSoccer America ConfidentialYouth Soccer InsiderWorld Cup Watch
RSS FeedsArchivesManage SubscriptionsSubscribe
Order Current IssueSubscribeManage My SubscriptionRenew My SubscriptionGift Subscription
My AccountJoin Now
Tournament CalendarCamps & AcademiesSoccer GlossaryClassifieds
On Song Spain and Off Key Horns at Confeds Cup
by Paul Gardner, June 15th, 2009 12:25AM

MOST READ

MOST COMMENTED

By Paul Gardner

So the Confederations Cup got itself moving -- rather sluggishly -- with a 0-0 tie, a scoreline that is now virtually traditional for opening games at international tournaments.

Iraq and South Africa both showed a great deal of caution and not much in the way of decent soccer -- or even adventurous soccer. From the home fans' point of view, it would have been kinder if they'd found themselves playing New Zealand -- now, an opening game against New Zealand, that would surely have had the crowd in ecstasy.

Because New Zealand is a very week team that simply does nor belong at this level. I say "this level" -- I'm not too sure what "this level" is, but I'm quite certain that New Zealand doesn't belong here. It was pitiful to watch them struggle so ineptly against Spain.

Of course, this was hardly a surprise. The worst drubbing at any international tournament that I have attended -- and there have been quite a few -- came in 1997. The scoreline was 13-0. This was a World Cup - the under-17 World Cup -- and I'll give you the full scoreline: Spain 13 New Zealand 0. (Iker Casillas and Xavi, both of whom played yesterday, were on that 1997 Spanish team, though they didn't play against New Zealand).

In South Africa, Spain inevitably looked like world-beaters. Maybe they are -- but I don't think any court of justice would accept this game as untainted evidence.

If it's any consolation to the bedraggled New Zealanders there are couple of positive things to say about their performance. Well, they're negative-positives, admittedly, things they didn't do. Firstly, New Zealand did not opt for out-and-out defense -- they tried to play, tried to attack. Sadly they're not capable of doing that effectively against good opposition. And secondly, the New Zealand players did not resort to physical intimidation. They kept, admirably, to the rules of the sport. This was a remarkably clean game, even though the Kiwis, seeing themselves repeatedly made to look foolish, must have been sorely tempted to launch a few violent tackles.

As far as the United States is concerned, this opening day must have been viewed with mixed feelings. For it showed that -- leaving Spain aside -- there are clearly three teams in this tournament that the USA can beat. Obviously, New Zealand is one of them, though the chances of the Kiwis advancing to the next round are non-existent. The downside is that if the USA finishes second in its group, it will surely face Spain. The only way to be sure of avoiding that fate will be to win the group and then face either Iraq or South Africa.

Which of the two will progress? Trying to figure that out gets us further into the morass created by the inclusion of the almost criminally feeble New Zealanders in this competition. In their group, the logical assumptions are that they will lose all three of their games, while Spain will win all three of its games. So New Zealand goes home, and Spain qualifies as the group winner. Who goes forward with them may well be decided on goal difference.

I don't think Spain will score too many times against either Iraq or South Africa. Because I would expect those teams to do what New Zealand bravely (or was it foolishly?) refused to do -- to play defensively. Iraq's boss, Bora Milutinovic has always been a cautious coach, while Joel Santana is unlikely to have his South Africans running heads down into the Spanish buzz-saw (and I fear we may see the cautious approach repeated by other, stronger, teams later in the tournament).

So that, if goal-difference does become the deciding factor, it is likely to mean which team, South Africa or Iraq, can score more goals against New Zealand.

Hardly a healthy situation -- it turns New Zealand into an all-too-obvious punching bag, while at the same time giving it a large role in blocking, or failing to block, the host nation's progress to the semifinals.

Talking of unhealthy situations, I wish the Confederations Cup organizers -- or maybe FIFA or, frankly just anybody -- would do something about those awful plastic horns that fans were so brainlessly blowing throughout both games.

A huge part of the atmosphere, even the beauty, of a live sports event -- and it seems to me that this has always been particularly true of soccer games -- is the "roar of the crowd" and the way that roar echoes the action on the field and the emotions of the fans, the swelling volume, the crescendos, the pauses, the gasps of disbelief, the frightened silences, the oohs and the aahs -- there's a pattern to it that belongs to the game.

Not with those damn horns there isn't. All we get is one prolonged, monotonous BLAAAAAH! I'm well aware that FIFA is against using technology, but maybe there's some way the clever TV technicians could banish that awful drone from the telecasts? If not, then there's an obvious way to stop it: simply make it an offense to carry those wretched things into the stadium. They are potential weapons, aren't they?

 



0 comments
  1. Dragos Axinte
    commented on: June 15, 2009 at 10:36 a.m.
    I grew up in Europe and attended many games that were loud and noisy in many ways, but never came across the plastic horns until attending games in the New World. They blow my ears off, they frazzle my brain, and have, in more than one occasion, caused me to miss goals as I was busy flinching in agony from the terrifying and sudden sound that just exploded behind my ears. They are so annoying to so many fans and yet so enjoyable by those who blow them. In my observation, in the US they are used mostly by kids, which could be the beginning of the solution to the problem: we should sit down and invent a better, less obnoxiouos toy that makes a profit and saves lives at the same time.

  1. Harmon Barnard
    commented on: June 15, 2009 at 1:35 p.m.
    I don't always agree with what Mr. Gardner says, but this time he is right on with both the competition in the Confederation Cup and those %&*#& horns.


Sign in to leave a comment. Don't have an account? Join Now




AUTHORS

ARCHIVES
FOLLOW SOCCERAMERICA

Recent SoccerTalk with Paul Gardner
Seattle's love affair with the Open Cup turns sour    
The controversy surrounding Clint Dempsey and his trashing of referee Daniel Radford's notebook is quite ridiculous. ...
Flying bat at Fenway Park should send warning to MLS    
The recent horrendous "accident" at baseball's Fenway Park, where a fan suffered what was, at the ...
Mourinho defends counterattacking soccer, calls other coaches stupid     
Jose Mourinho has raised, yet again, the old argument about the pluses and minuses of playing ...
Clampdown on tactical fouls way overdue    
My notes on the recent Seattle-Red Bulls game inform me that referee Jose Carlos Rivero called ...
Lincoln Phillips provides perspective on black soccer in 1970s USA    
As a goalkeeper, Lincoln Phillips should not feature among my most cherished soccer memories. I have ...
The remarkable Clive Toye -- who brought showmanship, excitement and color to American soccer    
The debt owed by American soccer to Clive Toye is a vast one. It is not ...
The small guys -- from Jimmy Greaves to Lionel Messi -- are the ones who matter most     
This week has brought home, in as dramatic a way as I ever recall, the joy ...
Concussion dangers still not fully accepted    
If ever proof were needed that the English style of refereeing is a bad model for ...
The Greatest. Remembering Richie Benaud, 1930-2015     
I'll need to switch sports for a moment here. But it's important. The greatest of television ...
Stars? Bah, says Mourinho. The team -- meaning the coach, that is ME, is the one who matters     
Coaches, of course, can be relied on to say something. Without doubt they are the most ...
>> SoccerTalk with Paul Gardner Archives