Join Now | 
HomeAboutContact UsPrivacy & SecurityAdvertise
Soccer America DailySoccer World DailySpecial EditionAround The NetSoccer Business InsiderCollege Soccer ReporterYouth Soccer ReporterSoccer on TVSoccer America ClassifiedsGame Report
Paul Gardner: SoccerTalkSoccer America ConfidentialYouth Soccer InsiderWorld Cup Watch
RSS FeedsArchivesManage SubscriptionsSubscribe
Order Current IssueSubscribeManage My SubscriptionRenew My SubscriptionGift Subscription
My AccountJoin Now
Tournament CalendarCamps & AcademiesSoccer GlossaryClassifieds
And now, Sepp Blatter says ...
by Paul Gardner, January 26th, 2010 11:44PM



By Paul Gardner

You never really hear much from the guys at FIFA. I don't mean President Sepp Blatter -- we hear from him all the time. But the other top guys -- like the members of the Executive Committee -- don't they ever have anything original, or even faintly controversial to say?

Not too often. Last year, Concacaf's Chuck Blazer raised a few eyebrows when he publicly disagreed with Blatter -- because disagreeing with Blatter is a rare occurrence. That is the way it is with FIFA Presidents these days. The tone was set by Blatter's predecessor, Joao Havelange, who ruled with an iron fist and a withering glance, and woe betide anyone who got in the path of either of those attributes.

Blatter works rather differently. His demeanor is less intimidating -- but every bit as powerful and coercive as Havelange's. What Blatter wants, Blatter will get. The head of FIFA these days is truly all-powerful.

A situation that is bound to encourage sycophancy. Mirroring  the President's views becomes the name of the game for those who surround Blatter -- not only the ExCo, but the paid staff members who run FIFA operations in Zurich.

And agreeing with Blatter must be a mighty difficult undertaking, because Blatter is a man given to sudden dizzying changes of mind.

Those who keep track of Blatter as he dashes around visiting the world's capital cities, will have noticed how his speeches -- lately they've been about who should host future World Cups -- bend in the political breeze. When he's in London, then England should get the World Cup; when he visits Australia, why the Aussies, surely, deserve the World Cup; when it's Moscow, then Blatter has "an affinity" for their World Cup bid. And so it goes.

But there's always been one safe bet. For years now, it has been safe to assume that one sure way to please Blatter is to affirm that video replays are the worst possible thing that could ever happen to soccer, and that they will never, ever, be permitted to besmirch the game. Blatter had made this very clear, repeatedly, and heatedly. For instance:

* June 27, 2002: Speaking three days before the World Cup final in Yokohama, Blatter assured everyone that "As long as I am president, I will make sure that no technical help will be introduced in refereeing ... to introduce technical items -- no. This will destroy an essential element of our game -- the emotion."

* April 27, 2004: During a visit to Berlin, Blatter imposed a lifetime ban on video replays: "As long as I live there will be no technical help."

* Feb. 12, 2005: During a workshop for World Cup referees in Frankfurt, Blatter again said no: "As long as I am FIFA president, there will be no video evidence."

* Dec.17, 2009: Only just over a month ago, Blatter -- sounding somewhat embattled -- announced that "Referees shall remain human, and we will not have monitors to stop the game to see if we are right or wrong. Please don't insist on this theme."

But the theme will not die down -- particularly not after the notorious Thierry Henry hand-ball incident. And now, this past weekend, Blatter has performed a most violent U-turn, one that must have left his supporters in some bewilderment. Just listen to what he told the Swiss newspaper SonntagsBlick about goal-line cameras (with their replays): "I'm not absolutely against it. If the technology is ready to adopt, then I am in agreement. If the security of the system is guaranteed then we will introduce it."

So all those cries of Never! Never! can now be erased from the record. Sepp Blatter is now open to video replays.

Yet ... why am I not surprised at this vertiginous rethink? Firstly because, despite Blatter's outcries, he has allowed FIFA to experiment with various technologies designed to produce a "smart ball" that would send signals to someone, somewhere, whenever it entered the goal. Secondly, because of the aforementioned tendency of Blatter to shift his positions with great facility. And thirdly because this position, this mulish, ostrich-like opposition (sorry about the mixed animals there) to video replays has always been the most stupid and the least defensible of Blatter's peeves.

In March, the International Football Association Board will study the use of goal-line cameras, which would greatly reduce the possibility of goals being wrongly awarded or denied. The cameras would also, presumably, make incidents like Henry's hand-ball infraction less likely to go unspotted.

Of course it will work. TV companies have been using such cameras for a decade or more, instantly letting the whole world see what the referee has missed. This is what makes Blatter's proviso "if the technology is ready ..." so ridiculous. The technology has been ready for years.

It won't be perfect, there'll still be the occasional case that defies judgment. But if we wait for perfection, we'll still be quibbling when doomsday descends upon us.


  1. Austin Gomez
    commented on: January 27, 2010 at 2:53 p.m.
    If professionally correct 'Technology' truly means that the Decisions of the Referee Team will be proper/correct (whenever there are vitally UNSEEN controversial decisions, contested only on most important "Moment-of-Truths" scenarios in the Game, which may change the entire complexion of the Game itself due to its obvious 'wrongness'), then the "Get-it-Right" philosophy must be strictly adhered to: "RIGHT ON!.....................LEFT OFF," as they say around the entire world! If video Technology will assist, (quickly & accurately & instantly), then why not avail of the usage of this modern "Tools-of-the-Trade" device. Remember the Game of Futbol is: For the GAME, for the WORLD! in my opinion, thank you!

Sign in to leave a comment. Don't have an account? Join Now



Recent SoccerTalk with Paul Gardner
Time is running out on violent goalkeeping     
Employing former players as TV experts is now well established as the thing to do. Like ...
Joe Morrone: Soccer's Determined Pioneer    
Joe Morrone. I have quite a few memories of Joe, all of them pleasant and friendly. ...
Should PRO have revealed, during the game, that the Red Bull trick play was illegal?    
This really rather ridiculous business of the Red Bull corner-kick trickery continues to reverberate.
Trickery, incompetence and ignorance -- the tale of a Red Bulls corner kick     
So the Red Bulls got away with one against Chicago last week -- their use of ...
It's time for FIFA to move out of the Alps    
It has occurred to me at regular intervals during the past decades that one of the ...
Beware the banalysts and the blight of banalysis     
The usual tripe from the TV commentators this past weekend: "The more they can get the ...
Soccer and Metrics (Part 2): A troubled partnership     
OK then. The aim of metrics in soccer is to improve player performance. After that, the ...
Soccer and Metrics (Part 1): Beyond the marketing silliness     
Now here's a nice example of the extravagances, the exaggerations the deceptions, and, yes, the downright ...
Impeding the goalkeeper, tackling from behind -- difficulties of definition    
The new FIFA Rule book for 2015-2016 presents the usual problem. What has been changed? The ...
A Soccer Rarity -- A Triumph for Common Sense    
There are three heroes in this story -- though heroes is really much too dramatic a ...
>> SoccerTalk with Paul Gardner Archives