Join Now  | 
Home About Contact Us Privacy & Security Advertise
Soccer America Daily Soccer World Daily Special Edition Around The Net Soccer Business Insider College Soccer Reporter Youth Soccer Reporter Soccer on TV Soccer America Classifieds Game Report
Paul Gardner: SoccerTalk Soccer America Confidential Youth Soccer Insider World Cup Watch
RSS Feeds Archives Manage Subscriptions Subscribe
Order Current Issue Subscribe Manage My Subscription Renew My Subscription Gift Subscription
My Account Join Now
Tournament Calendar Camps & Academies Soccer Glossary Classifieds
Two thumbs up for two, or three, DPs per team
by Ridge Mahoney, April 1st, 2010 8:20PM
Subscribe to Soccer America Confidential

MOST READ
TAGS:  mls, soccer business

MOST COMMENTED

MLS might have kept it simple by simply increasing the number of Designated Players each team can sign from one to two, and also allowing a team the option of using a third DP slot if it so wishes.

This is what the league has done, sort of. It has also opened up the cash box far enough that a team could field three Designated Players at a quite unobtrusive salary-budget charge, to use its terms, of just $450,000. I’d be tempted to point out that number is only about 18 percent of a team’s salary cap this year ($2.55 million per team) but that would be misleading.

Why? Because teams can use allocation money to “buy down” the salary-cap hit, to use common usage rather than the league’s term, of DPs. Last year, the first DP on a team counted $415,000 towards the per-team cap of $2.31 million; now, all DPs count the same against the cap -- $335,000 – and allocation money can be used to knock that number down to $150,000 per DP. A DP signed in midseason counts one-half of the regular hit -- $167,500 – and this procedure follows that of past seasons, when Cuauhtemoc Blanco and Denilson came to MLS during the summer.

To review, allocation money refers to “funds, separate from the club salary budgets, provided by the League based upon finish in the previous season, fees collected for the transfer of a player abroad, expansion or exceptional circumstances.” As the 2010 expansion team, Philadelphia has been provided with more than $1 million of allocation money, which it has used in trades and other transactions.

A third DP also costs the team a $250,000 penalty, which – and this is where the league has reverted to its often-byzantine ways – is spread among the teams not employing three DPs. That won’t amount to much per team; more likely than not only a few teams will sign up three such players, but it does levy an additional cost on the big spenders.

DP slots can no longer be traded, so a team that already has two DPs doesn’t have to jump through any hoops – other than the financial ones – such as a trade to tack on a third. As long as it’s willing to pay the freight, it can load up the train. No team will be permitted four DPs under any circumstances, at least not yet. Another change is DP slots no longer expire after a stipulated period of time.

Since the majority of teams have yet to sign even one DP, why has the league gone hog-wild, relatively speaking, to jack up the ante? One can suppose it allows said big spenders to splash out their own cash, as for DPs it is the team – not the league, which otherwise pays all salary costs – that must pony up. I suspect those costs cannot be passed onto other teams as are other losses that are spread amongst the MLS partners.

But I think this can indirectly increase pressure on notoriously frugal teams to sign up at least one DP, both to silence strident criticisms from fans and media pundits and to give ambitious coaches one method to remain competitive. If Toronto, Seattle, Los Angeles, Chicago and New York start beefing up on DPs and climb up the standings, pressure increases on teams bereft of said players to keep pace.

Rather than jeopardize the legal standing of its single-entity structure by allowing free agency to creep into MLS, the league has instead given the teams more license to bid aggressively for talent. A team need not acquire a new player to join the DP Club; players currently under contract can be "elevated" to DP status, as the Crew did with Guillermo Barros Schelotto (before bumping him back down after one DP season) and D.C. United did with Luciano Emilio.

This mechanism also gives teams, and the league, another way to keep good players who otherwise might leave. Since a team can use allocation money to acquire new players or re-sign players already on its roster, it can upgrade a player to a DP and also soften its cap hit with allocation money. However, a team is not obligated to use allocation money for its DPs. It can sign three at the full salary-budget charge of $335,000 each if it has the cap room, and deep pockets, to do so.

Since its inception, MLS has worked in mysterious ways. Ingraining the use of allocation money – the exact figures of which are never officially acknowledged – deeper into its player acquisition processes gives it a murkier look amid persistent skepticism that not all teams are treated equal.

But for ambitious organizations willing to spend, this is their methodology to do so. It's a counterpoint to parity dictated by competitive strategies and financial limits. Let’s see how it shakes out.



0 comments
  1. Anthony Pignataro
    commented on: July 15, 2010 at 7:42 p.m.
    I still think we have to start allocating DP money for American players with caps. That way we keep American players in MLS and the fans start to associate the National Team with MLS. In other words, call it DAP and each team MUST have a DAP, which is a Designated American Player with caps. This will allow the crossover popularity that MLS hopes to gain with the success of the mens National Team

Sign in to leave a comment. Don't have an account? Join Now




AUTHORS

ARCHIVES
FOLLOW SOCCERAMERICA

Recent Soccer America Confidential
Struggles of MLS Cup finalists are to be expected for smaller-market teams    
Portland and Columbus defied the odds -- and economic reality -- by reaching the MLS championship ...
Olympic women's soccer: Our winners & losers    
Olympic women's soccer left the taste of what might have been. A USA-Brazil semifinal at Maracana ...
'Cagey' Swedes deserve some credit    
The USA women fell short of the semifinals of a major tournament for the first time ...
'Worst MLS signing' Lampard is tearing it up    
A great run of form earned New York City FC midfielder Frank Lampard Player of the ...
Assessing the middle third -- of the MLS season    
Coaches and executives often speak of dividing a season - much as they do of the ...
Schmid departure starts to clear Sounders' deck for Lagerwey    
Eighteen months after joining the Sounders as president of soccer and general manager, Garth Lagerwey is ...
Toronto FC must rebound after embarrassing defeat for crucial home stand    
After an eight-game road trip to open the season, Toronto FC is in a playoff spot ...
Quakes need to build on stunning victory    
Every struggling team looks for a spark, a turning point, a shift of fortune that transforms ...
MLS Midseason Awards: Villa and the other Kamara are among the leaders    
The six major categories of awards presented each season by MLS run the gamut of experience, ...
Are U.S. women ready for another union fight?    
This should have been a good week for the National Women's Soccer League.
>> Soccer America Confidential Archives