Join Now | 
HomeAboutContact UsPrivacy & SecurityAdvertise
Soccer America DailySoccer World DailySpecial EditionAround The NetSoccer Business InsiderCollege Soccer ReporterYouth Soccer ReporterSoccer on TVSoccer America Classifieds
Paul Gardner: SoccerTalkSoccer America ConfidentialYouth Soccer InsiderWorld Cup Watch
RSS FeedsArchivesManage SubscriptionsSubscribe
Order Current IssueSubscribeManage My SubscriptionRenew My SubscriptionGift Subscription
My AccountJoin Now
Tournament CalendarCamps & AcademiesSoccer GlossaryClassifieds
Two thumbs up for two, or three, DPs per team
by Ridge Mahoney, April 1st, 2010 8:20PM

MOST READ
TAGS:  mls, soccer business

MOST COMMENTED

MLS might have kept it simple by simply increasing the number of Designated Players each team can sign from one to two, and also allowing a team the option of using a third DP slot if it so wishes.

This is what the league has done, sort of. It has also opened up the cash box far enough that a team could field three Designated Players at a quite unobtrusive salary-budget charge, to use its terms, of just $450,000. I’d be tempted to point out that number is only about 18 percent of a team’s salary cap this year ($2.55 million per team) but that would be misleading.

Why? Because teams can use allocation money to “buy down” the salary-cap hit, to use common usage rather than the league’s term, of DPs. Last year, the first DP on a team counted $415,000 towards the per-team cap of $2.31 million; now, all DPs count the same against the cap -- $335,000 – and allocation money can be used to knock that number down to $150,000 per DP. A DP signed in midseason counts one-half of the regular hit -- $167,500 – and this procedure follows that of past seasons, when Cuauhtemoc Blanco and Denilson came to MLS during the summer.

To review, allocation money refers to “funds, separate from the club salary budgets, provided by the League based upon finish in the previous season, fees collected for the transfer of a player abroad, expansion or exceptional circumstances.” As the 2010 expansion team, Philadelphia has been provided with more than $1 million of allocation money, which it has used in trades and other transactions.

A third DP also costs the team a $250,000 penalty, which – and this is where the league has reverted to its often-byzantine ways – is spread among the teams not employing three DPs. That won’t amount to much per team; more likely than not only a few teams will sign up three such players, but it does levy an additional cost on the big spenders.

DP slots can no longer be traded, so a team that already has two DPs doesn’t have to jump through any hoops – other than the financial ones – such as a trade to tack on a third. As long as it’s willing to pay the freight, it can load up the train. No team will be permitted four DPs under any circumstances, at least not yet. Another change is DP slots no longer expire after a stipulated period of time.

Since the majority of teams have yet to sign even one DP, why has the league gone hog-wild, relatively speaking, to jack up the ante? One can suppose it allows said big spenders to splash out their own cash, as for DPs it is the team – not the league, which otherwise pays all salary costs – that must pony up. I suspect those costs cannot be passed onto other teams as are other losses that are spread amongst the MLS partners.

But I think this can indirectly increase pressure on notoriously frugal teams to sign up at least one DP, both to silence strident criticisms from fans and media pundits and to give ambitious coaches one method to remain competitive. If Toronto, Seattle, Los Angeles, Chicago and New York start beefing up on DPs and climb up the standings, pressure increases on teams bereft of said players to keep pace.

Rather than jeopardize the legal standing of its single-entity structure by allowing free agency to creep into MLS, the league has instead given the teams more license to bid aggressively for talent. A team need not acquire a new player to join the DP Club; players currently under contract can be "elevated" to DP status, as the Crew did with Guillermo Barros Schelotto (before bumping him back down after one DP season) and D.C. United did with Luciano Emilio.

This mechanism also gives teams, and the league, another way to keep good players who otherwise might leave. Since a team can use allocation money to acquire new players or re-sign players already on its roster, it can upgrade a player to a DP and also soften its cap hit with allocation money. However, a team is not obligated to use allocation money for its DPs. It can sign three at the full salary-budget charge of $335,000 each if it has the cap room, and deep pockets, to do so.

Since its inception, MLS has worked in mysterious ways. Ingraining the use of allocation money – the exact figures of which are never officially acknowledged – deeper into its player acquisition processes gives it a murkier look amid persistent skepticism that not all teams are treated equal.

But for ambitious organizations willing to spend, this is their methodology to do so. It's a counterpoint to parity dictated by competitive strategies and financial limits. Let’s see how it shakes out.



0 comments
  1. Anthony Pignataro
    commented on: July 15, 2010 at 7:42 p.m.
    I still think we have to start allocating DP money for American players with caps. That way we keep American players in MLS and the fans start to associate the National Team with MLS. In other words, call it DAP and each team MUST have a DAP, which is a Designated American Player with caps. This will allow the crossover popularity that MLS hopes to gain with the success of the mens National Team


Sign in to leave a comment. Don't have an account? Join Now




AUTHORS

ARCHIVES
FOLLOW SOCCERAMERICA

Recent Soccer America Confidential
Downsizing works for the Red Bulls    
It only seems like only yesterday that the New York Red Bulls fired Mike Petke, prompting ...
The Omar Factor    
Galaxy defender Omar Gonzalez got his first start since the World Cup in a 2-0 defeat ...
Forward thinking jumbles USA puzzle    
Goals by Jordan Morris and Juan Agudelo illustrate the range of choices and decisions being faced ...
Experience counts for a lot, but youth will decide Women's World Cup    
Change comes slowly in women's soccer. Jill Ellis was no Jurgen Klinsmann in picking her 23-player ...
Agudelo's journey takes him back to the national team    
The youngest player ever to score for the USA is hoping the friendly against Mexico Wednesday ...
MLS gets its wish, and it's ugly -- parity    
So, let's have a show of hands. Who says their favorite MLS team is playing well? ...
Projecting Klinsmann's USA roster for Mexico game    
The next friendly for the USA is against its bitterest rival and with a roster announcement ...
Philadelphia's troubles extend far beyond who's in goal    
A sputtering attack and susceptibility on set plays have dragged the Union into last place.
Making a Strong case for soccer    
As lead soccer announcer for Fox Sports, John Strong has quickly moved onto the national stage ...
Jeff Plush on the NWSL: women's league plays long ball    
It might not sound like much but the National Women's Soccer League, which begins its third ...
>> Soccer America Confidential Archives