he's still one of the best!

Even if he didn't score himself, having him on the field drew defenders away from others, leaving them open to score. He was a big part of all of Argentina's games, even when he wasn't on the ball.

I agree, he is without a doubt the best player in the world today. Amazing touch and vision and yes, unselfish as well.

Only one of the top 20 paid players in the world are still playing in the World Cup. Xavi of Spain (Barcelona) is number 11 on the list. This goes to prove, there is no "I" in team. Here is the link to the top 20 player salaries. http://jobs.aol.com/articles/2010/06/29/football-pay/?icid=main|htmlws-main-n|dl6|link5|http%3A%2F%2Fjobs.aol.com%2Farticles%2F2010%2F06%2F29%2Ffootball-pay%2F

Of course he is one of the best, but he is still no Maradona until he achieves success on the World Cup stage.

There is no argument at all that he is indeed one of the very best players in the world. Unfortunately and sadly he did not have the supporting cast with the Albiceleste, and I blame the coach for not insisting and putting down his foot that they all play as a unit. It was amazing just how disciplined the German's were, marking him tightly and cutting off any possible openings and his pin-point passes that went astray. And yes, I feel sorry for him, but I'd tell him Lionel Messi, es uno de los mejores del mundo y nadie te lo quitara (Lio, yu're onf of the best in the world and no one can take this away from you!"

Messi can be on my team anyday. Although he did not score, he had some incredible shots, his work rate was high, his passing phenomenal and his dribbling sublime. Even without scoring, Messi was one of the most important players in the tournament.

Messi is vastly overrated; he was exposed in this WC as being quite ordinary. As the article correctly notes, he is better in La Liga because of his extraordinary teammates at Barcelona. Great Argentine players like Batistuta (all-time leading goal scorer for Argentina by miles) and Maradona were great irrespective of their supporting casts at both club and country. To paraphrase George Best, Messi "can't shoot with his right, can't head the ball, can't tackle, can't play defense..." - sounds ordinary to me.

I don't know why we here in America judge a player's worth solely by goals scored. The problem with Best's comment is simply this: Yeah, he can't shoot with his right or head the ball, but he's still able to outplay everyone else on the field. His individual skills and passing ability are uncanny, and because the defense has to key on him, he increases his teammates' chances of scoring just by being on the field (this is also why Pele, not Maradonna, is the best ever).There's more to this game, and more to judging a player's worth, than simple goals scored. I will go to my grave arguing that Cannavaro was the MVP of WC 2006, and he didn't score either. Italy gave up only two goals for the entire tournament, and Cannavaro was the biggest reason. Messi doesn't have to necessarily score a lot of goals in order to be the best in the world, which he arguably is.

Tom Symonds comment is about the single most ridiculous football perspective I have ever heard. So Messi "can't shoot with his right, tackle, or play defense?" Every player in history, including George Best himself had aspects of the game that were not necessarily a strong suit. As an analogy, did you know that Michael Jordan was not good at rebounding? His numbers for an NBA player were mediocre throughout his career. Does that make him an overrated player? Certainly the Club Barcelona (presuming that Messi could be cloned for the experiment) would put a serious ass-whooping on the Argentine Nationals. So what? The top club in the world like Barca, Real Madrid, Man U, Inter Milan, etc. are a lot better than any national team ever could be. That doesn't mean Messi is any less the special player. He is. There isn't a single team on planet earth who would not include him on their starting XI. Think about it Tom...this time more objectively and seriously.

Overrated? What a ridiculous comment. There is nothing "ordinary" about Messi. For the first four games, he was the best player in the tournament, bar none. He was the engine that drove a poorly prepared Argentine team as far as it went. He may not have scored, but he rattled the posts repeatedly and was key to most of Argentina's goals with his brilliant passing. He was also fouled and chopped with regularity, and rode everything out without losing his poise. The statement that Batistuta and Maradona were great regardless of their supporting casts is just patently false -- Maradona, you may remember, failed miserably in a star-studded team at Barcelona, where Messi has wildly succeeded. The supporting cast is critical -- even Pele had his legendary teammates -- and Messi had no one resembling a Burruchaga, a Valdano or a Batista to take the focus off him, or a Ruggeri to back him up. And the comments about Messi's individual skills are just plain silly -- he's just as good with his head and right foot as Maradona was, and he's a much better defender and tackler. If you think he's "ordinary" based on an ineffective game against Germany, you're a member of a very, very small club... and the lights are out in the clubhouse.

Messi is one of 11 players on the field ... if the other 10 do not play as a unit what can he do all alone. There were two or three Germans on him every time he touched the ball. I guess George Best, who died 5 years ago when Messi was 17 years old, must have been looking at someone else when Messi scored a wonderful header to beat Manchester United in the UEFA Championship game in 2009, at 21 years of age. Messi will prove you wrong in the World Cup when he is on a team, not forced to carry a team. Does Di María even know how to pass the ball? When a team losses that badly go look at the coach, and then at the backs and the midfielders -- oh no do you mean the decision not to select Inter stars Javier Zanetti and Esteban Cambiasso came back to hurt the team - really? Against the Germans it was ever so clear that Albiceleste missed both these Inter Argentinian stars. Shame on you Diego Maradona - you let your country down by not selecting the right players. Furthermore you had to open your big mouth and call out the Germans - well they showed up and your team was exposed and your formation failed. Javier Mascherano does not possess the passing ability required to launch attacks. As a result Lionel Messi, on numerous occasions, had to drop deep, sometimes into his own half, to retrieve the ball and setup the Argentinian attack. Hopefully in 2014 politics will not determine the selection of the coach in Argentina. The coach blew it, not Messi.

Robert, I agree with your sentiment, but your example is flawed. Michael Jordan averaged 6.2 rebounds per game for his career. That puts him in the very highest echelon of NBA guards, behind only Magic Johnson and Oscar Robertson. Kobe Bryant, for example, averages only 5.3.

You're all right...Messi is a record setter: 0 goals in 30 shots...worst goals to shots record in history of WC. Awesome. To be fair, I think Messi's got talent, to be sure, but he is not the "Messi-ah" of world football. Completeness in what a player can do is one of the most important marks of a great player. There's no greater stage than a World Cup to display a player's completeness in how he plays the game. Maybe in 2014 Messi will show the world his "greatness", but for now he's just another face in the crowd.

A galaxy of stars is usually no match for a well rehersed team. Messi is still the most skilled perfomer on the pitch, but he need a system in which he can thrive, and Diego was not able to provide it. He used too many players in the qualifiers to have a settled team with a purpose. Argentina should take a page out of El Tri's playbook of having lots of preturnament friendlies that surprised a lot of expertrs as to what they achieved with no great stars on the roster.

Tom, you know nothing about this sport.

@ Mike Gaynes, I did not do a good job of clarifying what was behind my analogy, although I agree it is probably not a perfect one. A group of psychologists in the 1990s were conducting a study on Halo bias in survey ratings. Participants were asked to rate Michael Jordan and host of other basketball players on all phases of the game. Michael Jordan was ranked #1 in rebounding by participants, despite only having a 6.2 RPG, which is actually average for the NBA. Why? Precisely ecause he was a Guard. Of course, as far as Guards are concerned, yes, he was a strong rebounder, but a coach would hardly expect Michael Jordan to be playing in a role down low where more rebounds would come his way. To do such would be foolish, because down low crashing the boards, he would get owned by the 7 footers. Take a look at the top 50 Rebounders. You will notice MJ is no where near being amongst the top (no of them are Guards of course!). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_National_Basketball_Association_career_rebounding_leaders So why did I choose this analogy? Because Tom Symonds mentions that Messi "Cannot defend" which is ludicrous because it is not his primary job, anymore than it is a Guard's job to be a top rebounder for his team.

Tom, people like you scare me talking about Messi. His is the comlpete player and humble to boot. He has always defended well. Putting pressure on the ball is every players job and he works as hard as anyone doing it. Maradona might not be in the conversation if it was not for a handball goal. Still to this day, Cruff has influence @ Barcelona and it is why Messi can flourish there. Maradona handicapped him from the begining.

Robert, I understood your analogy. I was just pointing out the inaccuracy of the the statement that Jordan "was not very good at rebounding"... when, in fact, he was. It would be like saying that Franz Beckenbauer was not a very good goalscorer, when in fact he was -- he just didn't do it as often as others because it wasn't his primary responsibility. You are certainly correct that Messi's defensive capabilities are irrelevant and the criticism of him along those lines is ludicrous (after all, nobody ever mentions Pele's tackling), but I'd go even further and argue that Messi is actually pretty decent defensively. He tracks back fairly well, uses his quickness to intercept passes and is quite capable in the tackle. And nobody will remember any of that when he retires, as I believe he may, as the second greatest player of all time.

I guess for Tom players such as Landon Donovan, Clint Dempsey, Bret Holman, Yun Jam Ni and Winston Reid are all superior to players such as Messi, Franck Ribery, Kaka and Wayne Rooney. The former group all scored more goals than the latter. Then there's that other guy, Christiano Ronaldo, who only scored once, and that was the sixth of seven against hapless North Korea.Yep, just another one of those overrated types. Get a grip Tom!

Kaka, Ribery, and old-timers like Junior, Socrates, Zidane...all more complete players than Messi. Messi has found his niche at Barcelona but not at the national level and I contend he would find it difficult at most any other club...even with Barca he was easily devoured by Inter. He's got a long way to go before he should be considered God's gift to football the way the shoe salesmen have tried to market him. By the way, "playing defense" means bringing pressure when your team's been dispossessed and not throwing your arms into the air everytime you lose the ball...count his whines in the Germany game...you'll need both fingers and toes to do so.

Ribery? Really? That's right, folks... Tom actually considers Ribery a more complete player than Messi. Yes, we all remember Ribery's brilliance in leading France to their dazzling success in the tournament. Our ears are still ringing with the chants for Ribery when he returned home, aren't they? Let's all chant Tom's name in exactly the same tones, shall we?

On second thought, however, I must admit that Ribery has talents Messi cannot imagine. Ribery's flair for teenage hookers, red cards, leading player strikes at the World Cup and generally disgracing himself and his country cannot be approached by any player in the world. He is the total package!

I think Tom is a lost cause!

Why is anyone taking this discussion personally or making personal attacks? Anyway .... No one paying attention to the Champions League can dispute the supreme talent of Lionel Messi. He certainly underperformed at this World Cup given his stature, his talent, and his sustained performance at Barcelona over the last couple of years. I was expecting him to "breakout" against Germany, but the Germans did a wonderful job isolating him. But Messi was not Argentina's problem at this World Cup. Maradona's team selection was Argentina's problem. He left players home who should have been in South Africa, notably Zanetti and Cambiasso. And he left players on the bench who should have been on the pitch. Diego Milito, Europe's most prolific goal scorer over the last 12 months, was nowhere to be found when Argentina needed goals! I also got the impression that the Argentine players had no real plan or system .. Maradona just put them out there and said "play", expecting ball skill and Argentinian destiny to carry the day. Maradona needs to go if Argentina is to win in Brazil. As an aside .. the same can be said for Brazil and Dunga's team selection. Kaka underperformed, but his performance was not the reason Brazil flamed out early. Would things have been different if Ronaldinho were available as a sub?

Tevez was the best player on Argentina. Messi has failed on the last two opportunities to perform on the World Stage (Champions League Finals and World Cup South Africa). I believe he would be an important player on any team, but don't think he has proven to be the best player in the world.

Wow, the Messi topic sure generated lots of opinion... and it is sure healthy to note we have some soccer- knowledagable folks out there. However, there is an important fact that was forgotten: Messi was with Barcelona for quite a long time, the players knew and supported each other very well, which translated to a large part of Messi's success. On the other hand, how long was he with the Argentine squad? They say time is of the essence, and this can also be applicable to the Argentine MNT 'cause I don't recall hearing about the team being together longer than, what, a couple of months? Maradolar thought tha by bringing all the stars from Europe together all be it for a short period of time, given their skill and "fame," they would meld quickly and very well, relying on the old Argentine "mystique", the same many of us thought Brasil would be playing the semifinals. But and alas, it was not meant to be as a more efficient and well prepared German team took the Albiceleste to the inevitable cleaners. You watch now, once Messi is back in Spain, he'll tart off where he left off on a team where unity and support is part of team work.