Join Now | 
HomeAboutContact UsPrivacy & SecurityAdvertise
Soccer America DailySpecial EditionAround The NetSoccer Business InsiderCollege Soccer ReporterYouth Soccer ReporterSoccer on TVSoccer America Classifieds
Paul Gardner: SoccerTalkSoccer America ConfidentialYouth Soccer InsiderWorld Cup Watch
RSS FeedsArchivesManage SubscriptionsSubscribe
Order Current IssueSubscribeManage My SubscriptionRenew My SubscriptionGift Subscription
My AccountJoin Now
Tournament CalendarCamps & AcademiesSoccer GlossaryClassifieds
MLS balanced in 2011 with 34-game schedule
by Ridge Mahoney, September 16th, 2010 12:41AM

MOST READ
TAGS:  mls


[MLS] To accommodate an expanded roster of 18 teams in 2011, MLS has taken the logical route and expanded its schedule to 34 games. Though the league has played an irregular schedule in the past, it opted to retain the formula of every team playing each league opponent once at home and once on the road regardless of conference alignment.

The 16th MLS season will kick off on March 19, 2011. The 34 matches in 32 weeks leading up to the final day of the season, Oct. 22. MLS also confirmed it will not take breaks for the Concacaf Gold Cup – the final of which will be played in the Rose Bowl on June 26, 2011 – or other international competitions. The league took a two-week break, the first in its history, during the 2010 World Cup first round.

Yet to be decided is the conference alignment for 2011. If the league retains its two-conference format, the addition of Portland and Vancouver would necessitate the moving of one Western Conference team to the Eastern Conference so both conferences would include nine teams. There is little support among team and league officials to lump all 18 teams together in a single table.

Splitting the 18 teams into three conferences, a la the Mexican league, and tweaking the playoff format have been suggested. This season, the league changed the playoff structure to award automatic places to only the top two teams in each conference, instead of three, with the remaining four spots allotted by overall points.



0 comments
  1. Dave Kantor
    commented on: September 16, 2010 at 8:33 a.m.
    "There is little support among team and league officials to lump all 18 teams together in a single table." Ridge, can you explain why a single table has little support? I think in the end, regional rivalries occur regardless of divisional alignment, and having teams cross conferences in the playoffs is just weird.

  1. Juan R
    commented on: September 16, 2010 at 11:52 a.m.
    It's just how MLS likes things. I think Garber used to work for the NFL and they have that mindset. I don't think it's a horrible thing at the moment, though I can't wait until we have a single table and pro/rel. Single table will come way before pro/rel. We'll need another 10-12 solid franchises for pro/rel to be a possibility, it seems. Maybe in 15 years? or maybe before the 2022 World Cup? That's more important for me than a single table right now.

  1. David Sirias
    commented on: September 16, 2010 at 12:16 p.m.
    "There is little support among team and league officials to lump all 18 teams together in a single table." Sources/links Ridge? Ok you can't reveal your sources. But are you sure this is not coming out of your imagination? The hard core MLS fans want a single table. My sources? Go to any freakin soccer board in this country. And what the customer wants should always drive management thinking......Single table is lovely little device that shines a light on excellence, mediocrity, and game day significance. Even the last place teams don't want to finish last, relegation aside. Garber does a lot of things right. Bust he should at least do a proper survey to see what the attentive MLS fan thinks of single table. Garber gets a failing grade on this issue.

  1. I w Nowozeniuk
    commented on: September 16, 2010 at 12:44 p.m.
    What's the difference in having a single table as opposed to the current conference concoction. At least it would be quite evident which team has the best record. Who cares about conferences, rivalries are natural. Top 8 teams qualify for the playoff; 1 v 8, 2 v 7, etc in the first round with the better record team getting home field advantage in the first round and away goals determine the winner in case of a tie in a 2 game series. Same goes for the semis. Final to be played at top ranked teams home...the neuteral field final is a slap in the face to the supporters. Time to stop kow-towing to the other sports...keep it simple stupid.


Sign in to leave a comment. Don't have an account? Join Now




AUTHORS

ARCHIVES
FOLLOW SOCCERAMERICA

Recent Soccer America Daily
U.S. under-20 national team wins semifinal thriller    
[DALLAS CUP] Rubio Rubin scored his second goal of the game on a rebound of his ...
What They're Saying    
"Miami's greatness is about the interaction of a vibrant culture and the water. We will earn ...
Strikers will test measure of progress at Carolina    
[NASL: Week 2] The Fort Lauderdale Strikers, seventh and fifth in the NASL's two half-seasons, will ...
Chelsea takes on its U-8s    
[VIDEO PICK: Off the Post] Chelsea's John Terry, David Luiz, Frank Lampard et al took on ...
Collins John slapped with three-game suspension    
[USL PRO: Week 5] The USL PRO career of Collins John, the Liberian-born Dutch international who ...
What They're Saying    
"There is no problem. Tensions are a bit high; I have no problem with that. They ...
Chivas USA's McNamara faces knee surgery    
[MLS INJURY REPORT] Rookie Thomas McNamara, who had started every game for Chivas USA until being ...
Road to Rio begins for Tab Ramos' group    
[USA UNDER-21 MEN] The road to Rio begins for the U.S. men's Olympic team begins with ...
New-look Thorns aim for two in a row on road    
[NWSL: Week 2] The defending champion Portland Thorns FC remain on the road for the second ...
Lack of playing time worrying for bubble players    
[AMERICANS ABROAD] With only four weeks at most for most players before the end of their ...
>> Soccer America Daily Archives