Join Now  | 
Home About Contact Us Privacy & Security Advertise
Soccer America Daily Special Edition Around The Net Soccer Business Insider College Soccer Reporter Youth Soccer Reporter Soccer on TV Soccer America Classifieds
Paul Gardner: SoccerTalk Soccer America Confidential Youth Soccer Insider World Cup Watch
RSS Feeds Archives Manage Subscriptions Subscribe
Order Current Issue Subscribe Manage My Subscription Renew My Subscription Gift Subscription
My Account Join Now
Tournament Calendar Camps & Academies Soccer Glossary Classifieds
Blame the EPL, not American owners
by Paul Kennedy, October 7th, 2010 12:48AM
Subscribe to Soccer America Daily


MOST READ
TAGS:  england


[MY VIEW] Wednesday's news that one American group will succeed another as the owner of Liverpool, one of the most revered clubs in English soccer, brought more moans and groans from the other side of the Atlantic, where American owners are vilified. But English critics are barking up the wrong tree if they think American owners are the problem.

Liverpool has been on a downward spiral since Americans Tom Hicks and George Gillett bought the club in 2007. The Reds reached a new low last weekend when they lost at home to lowly Blackpool and fell in the relegation zone.

"Built by Shanks, Broke by Yanks" read one of the banners at Anfield, referring to legendary manager Bill Shankly and Hicks and Gillett.

Liverpool's problems weren't its owners, American or otherwise, but the English Premier League, which allowed Hicks and Gillett to buy the club with borrowed money. Just as it allowed the Glazer family to buy Manchester United with borrowed money.

Both deals proved disastrous when the world financial markets crumbled in late 2008, leaving the owners with no one willing to refinance their loans on favorable terms.

Until the EPL tightens it ownership rules like those that exist in American sports, it will have no one to blame but itself the next time a club is thrown into crisis like Liverpool has been.



0 comments
  1. Brian Herbert
    commented on: October 7, 2010 at 11:33 a.m.
    Absolutely right. Sports franchises are very different from a "real" business, and even real businesses get over-leveraged with debt. I think history shows sports franchises are best owned by one or more wealthy individuals putting in THEIR OWN money.


Sign in to leave a comment. Don't have an account? Join Now


AUTHORS

ARCHIVES
FOLLOW SOCCERAMERICA

Recent Soccer America Daily
League increases suspension, fines Boswell    
[MLS DISCIPLINE] A vicious head-butt to New England forward Dimitry Imbongo has prompted the MLS Disciplinary ...
Bundesliga boss launches blistering attack on Qatar    
[WORLD CUP 2022] Criticism of FIFA's decision to hold the 2022 World Cup in Qatar heated ...
Rapinoe's Lyon close to completing near-perfect season    
[UEFA WOMEN'S CHAMPIONS LEAGUE] Americans will be represented in both Champions Leagues being played this week ...
Mixed success for Yanks in England    
[AMERICANS ABROAD] England remains the desired destination for Americans seeking to play abroad. Unlike Germany, where ...
History is not on new expansion team's side    
[MLS SPOTLIGHT] You don't think of Manchester City or the New York Yankees when the term ...
NYCFC's first hire is an obvious choice    
[MLS SPOTLIGHT] The first hire by New York City FC was a no-brainer. Former U.S. national ...
What They're Saying    
"It's like Harry Potter -- but it's about soccer. There's no Harry Potter flying on his ...
Parma pulls off picture perfect free kick in Serie A finale    
[VIDEO PICK: Golazo] Parma's clockwork implementation of an ingenious and devastating free kick routine generated a ...
Rough year for Yanks in Germany    
[AMERICANS ABROAD] It was a rather rough year for many of the Americans in Germany, where ...
What They're Saying    
"It's good. He did fine." -- D.C. United coach Ben Olsen on Jesjua Angoy Cruyff's performance ...
>> Soccer America Daily Archives