Join Now | 
HomeAboutContact UsPrivacy & SecurityAdvertise
Soccer America DailySpecial EditionAround The NetSoccer Business InsiderCollege Soccer ReporterYouth Soccer ReporterSoccer on TVSoccer America Classifieds
Paul Gardner: SoccerTalkSoccer America ConfidentialYouth Soccer InsiderWorld Cup Watch
RSS FeedsArchivesManage SubscriptionsSubscribe
Order Current IssueSubscribeManage My SubscriptionRenew My SubscriptionGift Subscription
My AccountJoin Now
Tournament CalendarCamps & AcademiesSoccer GlossaryClassifieds
Inspectors issue U.S. report
by Paul Kennedy, November 16th, 2010 9:02PM

MOST READ
TAGS:  fifa, world cup

MOST COMMENTED

[WORLD CUP 2018/22 BIDS] In a largely favorable report, FIFA nevertheless labeled the USA a "medium legal risk" to host the 2022 World Cup because "the necessary government support has not been documented." It is the only serious contender for the 2018 or 2022 World Cup to not have such government support.

(Click here for the executive summaries of the nine bidders FIFA released on Wednesday.)

The publication of the executive summaries of the nine bidding nations for the 2018 and 2022 World Cups on Wednesday comes a day before FIFA, according to the Wall Street Journal, is expected to announce that its ethics committee has cleared Nigeria's Amos Adamu and Tahiti's Reynald Temarii, accused of trying to sell their votes, on the grounds that they were entrapped by Sunday Times reporters posing as fake lobbyists representing U.S. interests.

FIFA labeled the USA a "medium legal risk" to host the 2022 World Cup because "the necessary government support has not been documented as neither the Government Guarantees, the Government Declaration nor the Government Legal Statement have been provided in compliance with FIFA's requirements for government documents."

(The only other bidders that were not marked as a "low legal risk" was 2018 bidder Belgium-Netherlands and 2022 outsider Japan,  both deemed a "medium legal risk" for the same reasons.)

The report goes on to note, however, that the USA has a long history of successfully organizing major events and U.S. government has "considerable experience in supporting the hosting and staging of major sports events and has proven its willingness to make material concessions, accommodate the concerns of event organizers." The U.S. government intends to enact the necessary legislation by June 1, 2013.

“We have been in conversations with FIFA about this," U.S. bid committee executive director David Downs told Bloomberg, "and they are comfortable with the situation."

A Congressional declaration of support is expected to be passed during the lame-duck session of Congress.

The USA bid committee submitted a budget of $661.2 million for the 2011 Confederations Cup and 2012 World Cup and projected 4,957,000 sellable tickets for the World Cup. (The next highest among the 2022 bidders is Japan with 3,280,000 sellable tickets.)

In face of intense competition from four bidders from the Asian confederation and political pressures that are viewed as working against the USA's 2022 bid, any concerns in the inspection reports are distracting as the clock ticks down to the Dec. 2 executive committee meeting at which the 2018 and 2022 hosts will be decided.

(As a Washington political story, Politico's Ben Smith took the dark view and noted that "domestic politics and the midterm election may imperil the U.S. World Cup bid.")

Of the four U.S. competitors for 2022, the country that received the harshest criticism in the executive summaries was Qatar as "the fact that the competition is planned in June/July, the two hottest months of the year in this region, has to be considered as a potential health risk for players, officials, the FIFA family and spectators, and requires precautions to be taken."

According to the various reports, Qatar was given a "high" overall operational risk in a confidential report judging 17 separate categories issued to the executive committee. Russia, which is bidding for the 2018 World Cup, was the only country to receive a "medium" evaluation. All other countries received a "low" overall evaluation.

Because of their distance from Europe, South Korea, Japan and Australia -- the three other 2018 competitors -- were all marked down for the risk of a reduction  in TV income and, as a result, commercial revenue from Europe.

By contrast, the FIFA inspectors noted in USA executive summary noted that "the TV ratings and media rights income in the Americas are likely to be higher at a USA-hosted World Cup."



0 comments
  1. JAMES SIEDLISKI
    commented on: November 17, 2010 at 10:39 a.m.
    www.BigEastSoccer.com

  1. Julia Sanchez
    commented on: November 17, 2010 at 11:33 a.m.
    that is just like the US government always against the people instead of, for the people like the constitution. If they were smart, they would support the country with soccer being a very popular sport in the last decade. Come on government do something good for the people for once.

  1. nick p
    commented on: November 17, 2010 at 7:57 p.m.
    like the US government

  1. Margaret Manning
    commented on: November 18, 2010 at 2:49 p.m.
    "the necessary government support has not been documented." Does this mean that we have paid the requisite bribes to various FIFA officials?

  1. Margaret Manning
    commented on: November 18, 2010 at 2:50 p.m.
    "the necessary government support has not been documented." Does this mean that we have NOT paid the requisite bribes to various FIFA officials? Documentation in the form of $100 bills, preferably in a very large suitcase??

  1. Bret Newman
    commented on: November 18, 2010 at 5:38 p.m.
    With President OBama & former President Bill Clinton strongly supporting US Soccer, I find it hard to believe our government is not doing enough to help. Clinton & OBama, and some of their other political friends, better start making some phone calls, and get this problem taken care of.

  1. I w Nowozeniuk
    commented on: November 18, 2010 at 7:46 p.m.
    Capitol Hill only responds to Wall Street hubris..it's clueless about the positive financial and media impact of a WC. As we speak, Capitol Hill is ready to do-in Main Street with budget cuts; they have no time for sports, unless of course it's baseball and drugs.


Sign in to leave a comment. Don't have an account? Join Now




AUTHORS

ARCHIVES
FOLLOW SOCCERAMERICA

Recent Soccer America Daily
A back-heel sombrero from Greek boy     
[VIDEO PICK: Skills] Greek youth soccer, in a game between AO Ioannina and Agia Eleousa, delivers ...
What They're Saying: Jose Mourinho    
"Obviously they must be very sad with the result but when we lose against a team ...
Report: W-League champion Pali Blues are folding    
The LA Blues won W-League titles as the Pali Blues in 2009, 2009 and 2013 and ...
The Messi files: Eight amazing scoring records    
Lionel Messi holds all the single-season scoring records. Now, he is cleaning up on the all-time ...
Mulroy departs NASL runner-up Ft. Lauderdale Strikers    
Tommy Mulroy, the longtime soccer promoter, is out as the president of the NASL Ft. Lauderdale ...
Business Reporter: adidas to open store in Orlando stadium    
MLS sponsor adidas will operate the league's first in-stadium store starting in 2016 with the opening ...
Three takeaways from Manchester City-Bayern Munich     
The Champions League actually includes runners-up and third- and fourth-place finishers, but this Group E game ...
Marshall becomes first three-time top MLS defender    
In his first season with the Seattle Sounders, Chad Marshall has been named the MLS Defender ...
Copa America: Brazil and Colombia will meet again    
Brazil and Colombia, which faced each other in a hotly contested quarterfinal match at the 2014 ...
Referees grab the spotlight in MLS playoffs    
If the goal of a referee is to go unnoticed, the two referees in Sunday's MLS ...
>> Soccer America Daily Archives