[RICHMOND] The University of Richmond’s board of trustees refused to reconsider its decision to drop men’s soccer and men’s indoor and outdoor track in favor ofa new men’s lacrosse program as part of what it described as a “reconfiguration” of its athletic program. Boosters had raised $3 million in pledges in a bid to save the programs, but the board, whichmet on Thursday, refused to grant a reprieve.
While the men’s soccer program struggled in recent years, the Spiders were a national power in the 1990’s. Indeed, college soccer was at itspinnacle in the mid-1990s when Richmond hosted the NCAA final four and drew record crowds.
The Spider track & field program had a long history of success. In 2011, the Spidersachieved the highest cumulative GPA (3.51) of all men’s track and field teams in the nation.
Here’s the board statement:
“The board appreciates and has listened carefully to the views that have been expressed since the decision was announced, and knows these views are allmotivated by a shared commitment to ensuring the best for the university. There have also, however, been unfortunate misunderstandings of the basis for the decision. The reasons for the decision arestraightforward: without placing additional demand on crucial resources of scholarships, positions in the class, operating funds or facilities, the reconfiguration permits the university to add apopular and growing sport and strengthen its other sports. The board’s candid and thoughtful discussions today confirmed our confidence that trustees received complete and accurate information andappropriately took all relevant considerations into account in making the decision in September.
“We recognize that this decision has been painful for the affected student-athletes and their families, and for the alumni and supporters of these programs. The board is certainly sympatheticand also grateful to those who stepped forward with offers of financial support for discontinued sports. The reconfiguration, however, was a strategic decision that reduces the number of sports whileincreasing the resources available to remaining teams. Increasing the number of sports, even with the generous philanthropy offered, would place imprudent demands on athletics and hinder theinstitution’s ability to invest in other priorities. The university’s careful stewardship of resources over many decades has helped ensure its excellence and generous financial aid, and this continuedcareful stewardship is all the more important in the current economic climate. The Richmond Promise clearly establishes institutional priorities for investment in the coming years to sustain andadvance the university’s excellence.”
Reads and sounds like bureaucratic crap. Why don’t they just shoot straight and tell it like it is: we have the power, we decided, and we’re not changing our minds despite any compelling information or financial support to the contrary.Not to worry; the entire collegiate system at $40,000 to $50,000 per year will soon be an artifact of an unsustainable era. And boards like those at UR will be forced by market dynamics to do that which they have long forgotten – to listen to their customers, the students and their parents. Sadly though, entire classes will suffer during the inevitable transition. Hang in and do your best!
Send a postcard to the college complaining about the loss of the soccer program.Every loss of a college soccer program is less opportunity for our kids and less chance of advancement in world soccer.Lacrosse over soccer? idiotic.
email these people at the college to complain about dropping the soccer program: eayers@richmond.edu, ccaumont@richmond.edu