Join Now | 
HomeAboutContact UsPrivacy & SecurityAdvertise
Soccer America DailySpecial EditionAround The NetSoccer Business InsiderCollege Soccer ReporterYouth Soccer ReporterSoccer on TVSoccer America Classifieds
Paul Gardner: SoccerTalkSoccer America ConfidentialYouth Soccer InsiderWorld Cup Watch
RSS FeedsArchivesManage SubscriptionsSubscribe
Order Current IssueSubscribeManage My SubscriptionRenew My SubscriptionGift Subscription
My AccountJoin Now
Tournament CalendarCamps & AcademiesSoccer GlossaryClassifieds
Board won't back down on decision to ax soccer
by Paul Kennedy, December 8th, 2012 8:26AM

MOST READ
TAGS:  college men

MOST COMMENTED

[RICHMOND] The University of Richmond's board of trustees refused to reconsider its decision to drop men's soccer and men's indoor and outdoor track in favor of a new men's lacrosse program as part of what it described as a "reconfiguration" of its athletic program. Boosters had raised $3 million in pledges in a bid to save the programs, but the board, which met on Thursday, refused to grant a reprieve.

While the men's soccer program struggled in recent years, the Spiders were a national power in the 1990's. Indeed, college soccer was at its pinnacle in the mid-1990s when Richmond hosted the NCAA final four and drew record crowds.

The Spider track & field program had a long history of success. In 2011, the Spiders achieved the highest cumulative GPA (3.51) of all men’s track and field teams in the nation.
 
Here's the board statement:

"The Board of Trustees affirms its September decision to implement a reconfiguration of the university's Division I athletics program that adds men's lacrosse and discontinues men's soccer and men's indoor and outdoor track. The decision was the result of a thoughtful and deliberate process that involved the highly inclusive development of an athletics strategic plan, extensive research by a knowledgeable and impartial task force, and substantial discussion in multiple board meetings.

"The board appreciates and has listened carefully to the views that have been expressed since the decision was announced, and knows these views are all motivated by a shared commitment to ensuring the best for the university. There have also, however, been unfortunate misunderstandings of the basis for the decision. The reasons for the decision are straightforward: without placing additional demand on crucial resources of scholarships, positions in the class, operating funds or facilities, the reconfiguration permits the university to add a popular and growing sport and strengthen its other sports. The board's candid and thoughtful discussions today confirmed our confidence that trustees received complete and accurate information and appropriately took all relevant considerations into account in making the decision in September.

"We recognize that this decision has been painful for the affected student-athletes and their families, and for the alumni and supporters of these programs. The board is certainly sympathetic and also grateful to those who stepped forward with offers of financial support for discontinued sports. The reconfiguration, however, was a strategic decision that reduces the number of sports while increasing the resources available to remaining teams. Increasing the number of sports, even with the generous philanthropy offered, would place imprudent demands on athletics and hinder the institution's ability to invest in other priorities. The university's careful stewardship of resources over many decades has helped ensure its excellence and generous financial aid, and this continued careful stewardship is all the more important in the current economic climate.  The Richmond Promise clearly establishes institutional priorities for investment in the coming years to sustain and advance the university's excellence."


3 comments
  1. F. Kirk Malloy
    commented on: December 8, 2012 at 11:59 a.m.
    Reads and sounds like bureaucratic crap. Why don't they just shoot straight and tell it like it is: we have the power, we decided, and we're not changing our minds despite any compelling information or financial support to the contrary. Not to worry; the entire collegiate system at $40,000 to $50,000 per year will soon be an artifact of an unsustainable era. And boards like those at UR will be forced by market dynamics to do that which they have long forgotten - to listen to their customers, the students and their parents. Sadly though, entire classes will suffer during the inevitable transition. Hang in and do your best!

  1. Amos Annan
    commented on: December 8, 2012 at 4:23 p.m.
    Send a postcard to the college complaining about the loss of the soccer program. Every loss of a college soccer program is less opportunity for our kids and less chance of advancement in world soccer. Lacrosse over soccer? idiotic.

  1. Amos Annan
    commented on: December 8, 2012 at 4:30 p.m.
    email these people at the college to complain about dropping the soccer program: eayers@richmond.edu, ccaumont@richmond.edu


Sign in to leave a comment. Don't have an account? Join Now




AUTHORS

ARCHIVES
FOLLOW SOCCERAMERICA

Recent College Soccer Reporter
Notre Dame, UC Irvine and Davidson top RPI rankings    
[MEN'S SOCCER] Defending champion Notre Dame is No. 1 in the initial NCAA Division I Men's ...
College soccer on the air    
[2014 SCHEDULE] On Thursday, California and Washington open play in Pac-12 men's action. For listings of ...
Orange soccer no longer an afterthought    
[SYRACUSE: Men] Syracuse came into the ACC in 2013 with a reputation as a basketball and ...
Brynjarsdottir is difference for Seminoles    
[FLORIDA STATE-VIRGINIA: Women] An early blast by Icelandic international Dagny Brynjarsdottir, her seventh goal of the ...
Soccer America Women's Top 25 Scoreboard    
[ROUNDUP: Sunday] After suffering its first loss of the season on Thursday, No. 3 Virginia Tech ...
No. 1 Bruins fall to Toreros as offense stalls    
[SAN DIEGO-UCLA: Men] Defender Patrick Zimmer, a German transfer from Division II West Florida, scored in ...
Sun Devils 'bummed' about only holding No. 1 Bruins to tie    
[ARIZONA STATE-UCLA: Women] No. 1 UCLA trailed for the first time this but came back to ...
Utes show what is possible in holding Cardinal even    
[UTAH-STANFORD: Women] No. 4 Stanford allowed a goal for the first time this season, and it ...
Fighting Irish make most of their chances    
[NOTRE DAME-NORTH CAROLINA: Men] A capacity crowd of 3,007 watched defending champion Notre Dame down North ...
Irish end Hokies' perfect start    
[VIRGINIA TECH-NOTRE DAME: Women] Second-half goals from Anna Maria Gilbertson and Kaleigh Olmsted carried No. 16 ...
>> College Soccer Reporter Archives