Join Now | 
HomeAboutContact UsPrivacy & SecurityAdvertise
Soccer America DailySoccer World DailySpecial EditionAround The NetSoccer Business InsiderCollege Soccer ReporterYouth Soccer ReporterSoccer on TVSoccer America ClassifiedsGame Report
Paul Gardner: SoccerTalkSoccer America ConfidentialYouth Soccer InsiderWorld Cup Watch
RSS FeedsArchivesManage SubscriptionsSubscribe
Order Current IssueSubscribeManage My SubscriptionRenew My SubscriptionGift Subscription
My AccountJoin Now
Tournament CalendarCamps & AcademiesSoccer GlossaryClassifieds
What They're Saying
January 19th, 2014 10:29PM

MOST READ
TAGS:  england

MOST COMMENTED

"If Guzan's going to be silly enough to come rushing out like that on a wet pitch, sliding out. What is Suarez expected to do here? ... If the keeper's going to be that stupid to come running out at that pace when he can't control himself. He's asking for trouble. He's asking problems. Suarez can't be expected to jump over him then just because he's come running out at his feet."

-- English TV pundit and former national team player Alan Shearer takes Luis Suarez's side in the latest British diving debate, ignited by U.S. keeper Brad Guzan's foul on Suarez during Liverpool's 2-2 tie with Aston Villa. (Daily Mail)


1 comment
  1. Allan Lindh
    commented on: January 20, 2014 at 8:01 p.m.
    Yes,that is the strikers perspective. But Suarez pulled up his feet before the possibility of contact, so he was going down irrespective of whether there was a slight touch. So yes, it was a dive. On the other hand, strikers who are forever being chopped down, learn early to pull up their feet to avoid damage to their feet and legs, and that may be what he was doing. It was a very soft call, on that all can agree, and it is a shame that a match was decided by it. The only possible solution I can think of is "video replay." Give each team two challenges, let the fourth official do the review, and the final decision. He can at his discretion consult with the three on-field officials. Would not solve all the problems, but almost certainly would reduce the number of unfortunate "tainted decisions" like this one. I believe in this case video review would have resulted in a decision of no foul, no penalty kick.


Sign in to leave a comment. Don't have an account? Join Now




AUTHORS

ARCHIVES
FOLLOW SOCCERAMERICA

Recent Soccer America Daily
What They're Saying: Laura Bassett    
"I couldn't breathe, my heart was out of my chest, and I wanted the ground to ...
MLS: This weekend ...    
The Seattle Sounders ended their three-game losing streak when they beat MLS Supporters' Shield leader D.C. ...
Three takeaways from USA-Guatemala    
The USA tuned up for the Gold Cup with a 4-0 win over Guatemala Friday night ...
Scouting Report: USA and Japan go for a third time    
The first rematch of a final in Women's World Cup history is set for Sunday when ...
USA-Guatemala International Friendly Player Ratings    
Four years ago, the USA completed its Gold Cup preparations by beating Guatemala, 6-0, in San ...
What They're Saying: Abby Wambach    
"It's nerve-wracking. It's brutal. And I'm not saying this because I'm sitting on the bench and ...
Women's World Cup watch parties set for Sunday    
U.S. Soccer will host a viewing party for Sunday's Women's World Cup final between the USA ...
Olivia the parrot picks Japan over USA    
Olivia, a 10-year-old African gray parrot, is predicting Japan over the USA in the Women's World ...
ICYMI | MLS: Report: New DP procedures formulated    
Allocation money could become even more valuable under new policies adopted by MLS. One of the ...
Reader's Note: Watch for Special July 4th Edition    
Soccer America will publish Soccer America Daily on Saturday as it previews Sunday's Women's World Cup ...
>> Soccer America Daily Archives