Join Now | 
HomeAboutContact UsPrivacy & SecurityAdvertise
Soccer America DailySoccer World DailySpecial EditionAround The NetSoccer Business InsiderCollege Soccer ReporterYouth Soccer ReporterSoccer on TVSoccer America ClassifiedsGame Report
Paul Gardner: SoccerTalkSoccer America ConfidentialYouth Soccer InsiderWorld Cup Watch
RSS FeedsArchivesManage SubscriptionsSubscribe
Order Current IssueSubscribeManage My SubscriptionRenew My SubscriptionGift Subscription
My AccountJoin Now
Tournament CalendarCamps & AcademiesSoccer GlossaryClassifieds
My View: Look abroad for All-Star oomph
August 28th, 2002 3:29PM



The decisions made under duress at this year's MLS All-Star Game were hardly as appalling as some media outlets portrayed them. Considering the awful luck of the day, the solutions were reasonable. The simple fact is that the field was unplayable immediately after the storm. The 10 minutes attempted at that point were laughable. Simply put, Paulina Rubio's performance allowed the field to drain. And as much as sports ''purists'' might hate such realities, a league thirsting for sponsors cannot afford to dismiss a giant like Pepsi.

That settled, whither the All-Star Game from here? Clearly this was the best format to date. But as Bruce Arena already hinted, repeating it next year would be inappropriate.

The concept that MLS was already pursuing before the U.S. success in Korea sounds most enticing: bringing in a world-renowned club, such as Real Madrid, Manchester United or AC Milan, as the opponent. Even if they're just starting preseason, it would make for an intriguing game.

The best thing about such a matchup is that the fans will actually have an allegiance to one side. Part of what takes the wind out of the sails of any all-star game is that nobody really cares who wins. Fans half-heartedly cheer goals for both sides and the game generally loses drama as it progresses. That's why having an outside opponent is better. Another idea worth investigating, then, is a team of Mexican League all-stars playing against MLS's best.

Either of those scenarios will have its objectors if the game is anchored in the middle of the season. Coaches don't want people to care who wins, because their main concern is avoiding injuries heading into the stretch run. But those same coaches are the first to say, ''If you go in soft, you're going to get hurt'' and ''injuries are completely random.''

So MLS should make sure that the groundwork laid this year allows a high-class opponent to be announced well ahead of next year's game.

by Soccer America Senior Editor Will Kuhns

No comments yet.

Sign in to leave a comment. Don't have an account? Join Now



Recent Soccer America Site
FIFA: Blatter wins first round, 133-73    
Embattled Sepp Blatter had a 133-73 edge over his sole opponent, Prince Ali of Jordan, in ...
Caribbean combine returns next year    
More than two dozen players from the Caribbean played in MLS this season, and teams looking ...
Saint Louis picked to repeat    
[ATLANTIC-10: Men] Defending champion Saint Louis has been picked to repeat in the Atlantic-10's preseason poll ...
UEFA Champions League viewing schedule    
[TELEVISION GUIDE] The UEFA Champions League moves into Matchday 4 with a special kickoff time of ...
Young Arsenal star suffers horrendous injury    
[ENGLAND] Arsenal teenager Aaron Ramsey, considered the greatest Welsh talent to come along since Ryan Giggs, ...
GAMES: Live and same-day delay on national TV    
MLS WEEKEND WRAPUP: Twellman strikes again; L.A. wins 'Clasico'    
CHAMPIONS: Goal difference gives PSV Dutch title    
FABIEN BARTHEZ: French great bolts after assault    
>> Soccer America Site Archives