Join Now  | 
Home About Contact Us Privacy & Security Advertise
Soccer America Daily Soccer World Daily Special Edition Around The Net Soccer Business Insider College Soccer Reporter Youth Soccer Reporter Soccer on TV Soccer America Classifieds Game Report
Paul Gardner: SoccerTalk Soccer America Confidential Youth Soccer Insider World Cup Watch
RSS Feeds Archives Manage Subscriptions Subscribe
Order Current Issue Subscribe Manage My Subscription Renew My Subscription Gift Subscription
My Account Join Now
Tournament Calendar Camps & Academies Soccer Glossary Classifieds
Rangers' failure was eminently deserved
by Paul Gardner, May 15th, 2008 7AM
Subscribe to SoccerTalk with Paul Gardner

MOST READ

MOST COMMENTED

I have just had the melancholy experience of watching Glasgow Rangers lose the UEFA Cup final to Zenit St.Petersburg. It has left me feeling immeasurably disappointed, and really rather sad.

Now, let me clarify. I'm not feeling put out of joint because Rangers lost. I really don't give a damn. Nor do I particularly care about Zenit. But I very definitely do care about the sport of soccer.

Hence my sadness, and -- something I didn't mention before -- my anger. And Rangers take the brunt of my wrath for perpetrating an utter travesty of the sport. You want negative soccer? Rangers supplied it, bucket loads of it, dreadful, boring stuff. You want caution, you want crude, unimaginative, inept play? Rangers gave us plenty of all of that, too.

Really, Rangers should be up on a collective charge of bringing the game into disrepute. This was quite woeful stuff.

But there can hardly be any complaints that it was unexpected, that we didn't know it was coming.

Just look at Rangers' record in the eight UEFA Cup games that it played leading up to the final: eight games in which it scored only five goals. But eight games in which its defensive-bunker tactics meant that opponents were limited to only two goals!  Take a look, too, at the semifinal against Fiorentina -- a two-legged series that produced no goals at all, and that Rangers eventually won on penalty kicks.

That tells you what really needs to be known, here -- and, by my measurements, it shifts some (but by no means all) of the blame. From Rangers to the guardians of our game. To FIFA, to the referees, and to coaches in general.

Surely there must be something wrong in a sport in which a team that averages less than goal game can reach the final of an important tournament?

Of course, I'm greatly tempted to draw a comparison with the dreadful Greeks who won the 2004 European championship -- a team that averaged 1.2 goals per game. The Greeks' deplorable performance was successful but the Rangers' efforts to copy the Greeks (and you knew that, sooner or later, someone would copy them) happily ended in abject failure.

A failure that was eminently deserved. What is to be said of a team that isolates a lone forward (Jean-Claude Darcheville) up front, and makes virtually no effort to get him the ball with a playable pass?  Of a team that was frequently seen in the first half with a line of six defenders at the back, or with eight defenders in its penalty area? A team that seemed to be interested only in thwarting Zenit attacks, and displayed little willingness to attack or any great proficiency in doing so on the rare occasions when it tried.
 
I imagine that Viacheslav Malafeev, the Zenit goalkeeper, must have touched the ball sometime in the first half, but I cannot remember him doing so. That could be due to the fact that I fell asleep. In the middle of the afternoon.

I'm sorry -- but with the best will in the world, this was a craven Rangers performance that deserved exactly what it got. Why would Rangers play that way? Well, the answer is so obvious that it is likely to be overlooked. Teams -- Greece and Rangers among many -- play that way because they believe that is the way to win. Greece did win, Rangers got to the final.

So there is some evident justification for the belief in cautious, negative soccer. Does it make sense to blame Greece's coach Otto Rehhagel or Walter Smith of Rangers for doing what, statistically, looks like translating into success?

Hardly. The fault is in the sport itself. Changes are needed, changes that will greatly increase the importance of goal-scoring. Changes that will make it clear that the way to win games is to concentrate on attack, rather than defense. Which means making defensive play a lot more difficult than it currently is.

I mentioned above that, against Rangers, the Zenit goalkeeper had very little work to do. But the Rangers goalkeeper Neil Alexander was not exactly over-employed, either -- simply because a team -- any team, a team with good players or a team with poor players -- can clog their defensive third of the field, and make it extremely difficult for opponents, however good they may be -- to break through. And so we got a final -- a final, mind you! -- with all the soporific certainty of an overdose of sleeping pills.

But Walter Smith must bear some blame for this travesty, for he is the one who chose to play this way, who chose to field two defensive midfielders and a lone, barely-used, forward.

A thoroughly tedious game, relieved by flashes of real soccer from Zenit, and two pretty good goals. Rangers offered nothing, and they got nothing in return. So be it.



0 comments
  1. Joao Santarita
    commented on: May 15, 2008 at 9:35 a.m.
    Yeah! But what is the solution that is alluded to ("changes are needed") but to which no proposal is made?
  1. David Whitten
    commented on: May 15, 2008 at 10:21 a.m.
    I agree. Nothing short of doing away with the off-side rule will instantly work to reward attacking play - and that would probably be unthinkable...
  1. Manuel Trejo-von Angst
    commented on: May 15, 2008 at 6:25 p.m.
    the offside rule does need a re-think. It rewards defenders for not paying attention to the attacking players, sorry that's all it does. If you allow your man to drift behind you free and open you deserve to be scored upon. Basketball toyed with a 'no cherry picking (offside)' rule many moons ago and they came up with the same conclusions. It was also around that time they stopped allowing teams the luxury of advancing the ball past the centerline only to play it back to kill time and lull teams asleep. Hockey decided on the same thing. I'm not saying they need to put all of those into soccer but the negative approach is garbage and all the 'but it's brilliant catennacio' cries in the world won't convince me otherwise.

Sign in to leave a comment. Don't have an account? Join Now




AUTHORS

ARCHIVES
FOLLOW SOCCERAMERICA

Recent SoccerTalk with Paul Gardner
That Goal    
It was Pele who started the "soccer is beauty" theme. He titled his autobiography -- one ...
Tab Ramos paints a rosy American future in the changing U-20 World Cup -- but a U-18 World Cup would make more sense     
Tab Ramos has been talking in glowing terms of his team and its adventures at the ...
What's this? A goalkeeper penalized for rough play?     
Meet Sorin Stoica. Maybe you've seen him in action during MLS games. Not a highly paid ...
Scots wha hae! Thoughts on the sad and ominous decline of Scottish soccer    
I note, with considerable exasperation tempered by sadness, that Scottish soccer is experimenting with a marvelous ...
Celebrity coaches -- who needs them?     
I am still finding it difficult to come to terms with the extraordinary way in which ...
Wenger must stay -- even the stats agree     
Arsene Wenger should stay. That's what I think. And I think that way because I respect ...
Violent Goalkeeping (Part 2): FIFA must radically rethink the goalkeeper's role    
Last time, I asked: "What action has soccer taken to at least reduce the incidence of ...
Violent Goalkeeping (Part 1): Players at risk as soccer ignores its own rules    
Goalkeepers, we are told, need protection. No doubt we all agree. Up to a point.
The triumphant return of Bruce Arena    
Well, take that Jurgen Klinsmann. Never at any time during his five years in charge of ...
MLS games compare well with EPL but referees in both leagues reluctant to call PKs    
During this past weekend, I watched -- on television, of course -- 15 games. Well, not ...
>> SoccerTalk with Paul Gardner Archives