Join Now  | 
Home About Contact Us Privacy & Security Advertise
Soccer America Daily Soccer World Daily Special Edition Around The Net Soccer Business Insider College Soccer Reporter Youth Soccer Reporter Soccer on TV Soccer America Classifieds Game Report
Paul Gardner: SoccerTalk Soccer America Confidential Youth Soccer Insider World Cup Watch
RSS Feeds Archives Manage Subscriptions Subscribe
Order Current Issue Subscribe Manage My Subscription Renew My Subscription Gift Subscription
My Account Join Now
Tournament Calendar Camps & Academies Soccer Glossary Classifieds
Beware of Brits Bearing Baloney
by Paul Gardner, December 8th, 2008 7AM
Subscribe to SoccerTalk with Paul Gardner

MOST READ

MOST COMMENTED

Barely a week goes by -- or so it seems -- without an announcement that a foreign club, usually English, has "entered into an agreement" with an American youth club.

I have in front of me the news that the Dallas Texans are now -- well, what are they? -- certainly something to do with Manchester United - an affiliated club, maybe or a farm team for Man U? For that matter, what is CASL, which has a similar "agreement" going with another of England's top teams, Chelsea?

That agreement is described by Charlie Slagle, the CEO at CASL, as "more of a marketing agreement" -- meaning that Chelsea will be supplying CASL with Chelsea shirts. With, you bet, the name Chelsea on them. Great, if you're a Chelsea fan, no doubt. It's eminently possible that all these "agreements" -- at least from the foreign club point of view -- are entirely about marketing, about creating fans, getting their "brand" of soccer more widely known, and, of course, inevitably, selling shirts.

So be it. But every one of these soccer arrangements that I've read about always includes a nod in the direction of the sport itself. This sort of thing, from Chelsea's chief executive Peter Kenyon, who maintains that Chelsea have a "holistic" approach, and that "We will be working with them to support player coaching and development ..."

I've no way of knowing whether there is genuine interest behind this, or not, but I have my doubts (the last time I met up with Kenyon, he was preaching something similar, only he was working for Man U then). Whatever -- it means, inevitably, that there will be yet more Brit coaches arriving with their super-duper training methods, all eager to show the stupid Yanks how to do things. There is always the assumption that the American clubs are not too good at coaching and could do with some help from the foreigners. The English, especially, are rather keen on emphasizing their superiority in this area.

As far as CASL is concerned, there is quite an irony there -- the relationship sprouted after teams from CASL and Chelsea had played each other in an American youth tournament. As it happens, CASL won the game -- so who should be giving coaching expertise to whom?

Slagle denies that the Chelsea coaches who will be giving clinics will be in charge of anything, stating that "there would have been objections if they had decided that they were going to impose their will on how we did things."

Brave words, Charlie, but if there's disagreement -- and there will be -- the overwhelming weight of one of the world's top pro clubs vs. an American youth club tells you that the sides are not equally matched.

The same will apply with the Dallas Texans. Back in 1999 ManU sent an under-12 team to the Dallas Cup that didn't even make it out of the first round. Yet here they are again, and just listen to the snooty arrogance of Brian McClair, director of the Man U Academy as he explains how lucky the Texans are and how they'll be expected to jump to the Man U whip: "This is a great opportunity for the Dallas Texans ... We are looking forward to welcoming them to Manchester and putting them through their paces." Quite the diplomat, our Mr. McClair.

At least Man U sits near the top of the Premier League. Another recently announced "partnership" is between the San Jose Earthquakes and Tottenham Hotspur, a club that lies near the bottom of the EPL. Never mind, the Earthquakes will be the fortunate beneficiaries of an "exchange of coaches and methodology."

So let us hope that these agreements, partnerships, arrangements -- whatever they're called -- are indeed limited to commercial matters and shirt-selling. May I put that another way, that the agreements are simply examples of good old-fashioned commercial exploitation.

Because if they are serious about the soccer, we have a problem. Looked at with a critical eye, the English academies do not do a good job. They have come under repeated criticism as being unproductive and too expensive to run. At Man U, coach Alex Ferguson last year stated flatly: "I think the academy system is seriously in danger of falling apart."

At Chelsea 15 scouts were recently cut from the academy staff amid rumors that the club was not happy at the lack of promising youngsters coming through the program.

There is something distinctly offensive about this attempt to palm off on U.S. coaching systems and "methodology" that have failed to measure up in England.

 



0 comments
  1. David Flanagan
    commented on: December 8, 2008 at 12:11 p.m.
    Nice try Paul, unless I miss your point the European Clubs see the need for cheap players coming out of the USA. MLS has the USSF Academy program to help them find players at someone elses expense. The Euros saw the light and are jumping on the bandwagon. Affiliation with American Clubs gives them direct access to players, players and families who they will market to wear their gear, support them from afar and maybe recruit their child. The first wave of european coaches have found their nitch, American coaches have discovered they are just as qualified to coach and are replacing the "Imports" at clubs. The next wave is to affiliate with experienced clubs with quality reputations, send their people over attempt to offer their way to play the game. The coaches who travel here will make their own deals with other clubs and the cycle begins once again. Will this lead to a better quality of US players? Time will tell.

Sign in to leave a comment. Don't have an account? Join Now




AUTHORS

ARCHIVES
FOLLOW SOCCERAMERICA

Recent SoccerTalk with Paul Gardner
Violent Goalkeeping (Part 2): FIFA must radically rethink the goalkeeper's role    
Last time, I asked: "What action has soccer taken to at least reduce the incidence of ...
Violent Goalkeeping (Part 1): Players at risk as soccer ignores its own rules    
Goalkeepers, we are told, need protection. No doubt we all agree. Up to a point.
The triumphant return of Bruce Arena    
Well, take that Jurgen Klinsmann. Never at any time during his five years in charge of ...
MLS games compare well with EPL but referees in both leagues reluctant to call PKs    
During this past weekend, I watched -- on television, of course -- 15 games. Well, not ...
Of tattoos and voodoo and science ... and soccer    
My calendar says March 1. But, quite possibly, global warming has advanced things. The weather is ...
Suddenly, the sport itself rebels against low-scoring Scrooge soccer    
We haven't seen anything like this for quite a while. In fact it was beginning to ...
Pep snubs Kun -- modern soccer at its worst    
Back in 2005 the word from Argentina was that maybe -- of course maybe -- a ...
Where soccer fails, the NFL gets it right    
An impertinent book, this. The title and subtitle tell you succinctly what you are getting: "The ...
More urgent than Van Basten's rule changes: soccer needs a total reversal of referees' negative mindset    
The problem is this. To praise Marco van Basten for speaking out on a topic that ...
Clearance: an ugly play, a useless stat     
For some time now I have been wondering about the soccer term "clearance." A term, admittedly, ...
>> SoccerTalk with Paul Gardner Archives