Join Now  | 
Home About Contact Us Privacy & Security Advertise
Soccer America Daily Soccer World Daily Special Edition Around The Net Soccer Business Insider College Soccer Reporter Youth Soccer Reporter Soccer on TV Soccer America Classifieds Game Report
Paul Gardner: SoccerTalk Soccer America Confidential Youth Soccer Insider World Cup Watch
RSS Feeds Archives Manage Subscriptions Subscribe
Order Current Issue Subscribe Manage My Subscription Renew My Subscription Gift Subscription
My Account Join Now
Tournament Calendar Camps & Academies Soccer Glossary Classifieds
FIFA doctor's views deserve more attention
by Paul Gardner, October 1st, 2009 12:32AM
Subscribe to SoccerTalk with Paul Gardner



By Paul Gardner

I feel pretty sure that I have never met a rights protection expert, and that I would not recognize one anyway. But I could be wrong. FIFA seems very eager to tell me, and everyone involved in soccer, just how important these guys (and presumably gals) are.

So it could be that, quite unaware of the fact, I bumped into any number of RPEs at the last World Cup, in Germany. Seems they were everywhere -- "pounding the streets of the host country" to quote the official FIFA World. There'll be an army of them too in South Africa, it seems, doing more street pounding, all in the fight against ambush marketing.

I'm bored already with this stuff, but FIFA says I shouldn't be because without its Rights Protection Program (RPP) all sorts of cowboy operators would be selling replica and knockoff stuff, cutting into the profits of genuine FIFA sponsors therefore making sponsors harder to find and therefore possibly reducing FIFA's income and its ability to finance its many tournaments and social programs.

Which is all no doubt true. I'm still bored by the whole thing. But FIFA insists on circulating stories about it -- and I can only assume the audience they're aimed at is the sponsors themselves, an assurance to them that FIFA is out there actively protecting their rights.

I mean who else would want to read this stuff? Just last week a story appeared on the FIFA website -- this time involving FIFA's Legal Affairs Division which, we're told, is working closely with New Scotland Yard (no mention of Sherlock Holmes, though) in its battle against the sale of counterfeit tickets. If you struggle through the article, what comes through loud and clear at the end of it is that you should only buy your tickets directly from FIFA-approved tour operators.

No one knows if security is going to be a problem in South Africa, but things should be OK on the rights protection front. At the recent Confederations Cup, considered a dry-run for the World Cup, FIFA World informs us that "Working together with legal advisers, volunteer patrollers, host city representatives and South African police officers, the RPP venue managers maintained a constant presence around the stadiums and Commercial Restriction Zones (eh?) ..."

Great success is recorded, with the police being "able to snatch bag-loads of counterfeit goods." Also thwarted was an attempt by a "South African beer brand" that was handing out its own T-shirts to fans, and this is considered extremely serious, because "it attempts to turn large numbers of fans into human billboards" inside the stadium. That is prevented by the RPP police confiscating the shirts, which gets people annoyed, and gets FIFA a bad name.

Then there's FIFA's Commercial Legal Department ... but enough of this. Just be satisfied that the sponsors, the ones who ask you to pay through the nose for anything from a key ring to a package tour, are being protected.

Around the same time that FIFA's rights protection story went up on its website, another FIFA-oriented article appeared. A rather different sort of article.

This one was from a news agency, not from FIFA, and actually had to do with the game itself. It contained what I rate as one of the most important statements about soccer made for years. It came from the head of FIFA's medical department, Dr. Michel D'Hooghe. This was not about protecting commercial rights, but about protecting players.

"We see more violent fouls over the whole world," said D'Hooghe, "Some of the fouls send shivers down your spine."

D'Hooghe's message was meant for his bosses at FIFA, for players ... and for coaches: "... I question the role of some of the coaches. In what frame of mind do they send their players on to the field?"

Plus a pointed criticism of game officials: "The referees have the key. They are the only ones who can impose an immediate sanction. They do not do it often enough and there is a lack of uniformity."

This is a message that should have come, years ago, from FIFA itself, or from its referees committee, or from IFAB -- or even from the coaches. But all of those groups have abdicated their responsibility to the game, none of them has spoken out. So we have to wait as the injuries mount and get more serious, until it's the head of the medical department who feels obliged to demand a halt to the carnage.

Well, better from Dr. D'Hooghe than from no one, and better late than never. Readers of this column will know that I have for some time now been inveighing against FIFA's obsession with diving when it should be trying to stamp out thuggery. I have now been joined by none other than FIFA President Sepp Blatter who -- prompted no doubt by D'Hooghe's remarks -- said earlier this week that diving is "not so terrible that we should intervene after a match. The disciplinary committee should not intervene on that. They should intervene on violent play."

We shall see how far Blatter -- a well-known band-wagon hopper -- takes his new-found enthusiasm. However that turns out, there's surely something amiss with FIFA's Image Protection Department (assuming it has one) when it generates basically boring stories about its intellectual property rights, while its president refers to a crucial sporting matter like violent play almost as an aside.


No comments yet.

Sign in to leave a comment. Don't have an account? Join Now



Recent SoccerTalk with Paul Gardner
Chuck Blazer 1945-2017: The Fatally Flawed Friend     
The tragedy that was Chuck Blazer is now over. And tragedy it assuredly was, a good ...
New medical study shows FIFA protocol is being ignored    
To laugh ... or to cry? There is no middle course here, no way of dodging ...
The Gnat's Eyebrow and other VAR stupidities     
The trial of video-assistance for referees currently under way at the Confederations Cup in Russia cannot ...
That Goal    
It was Pele who started the "soccer is beauty" theme. He titled his autobiography -- one ...
Tab Ramos paints a rosy American future in the changing U-20 World Cup -- but a U-18 World Cup would make more sense     
Tab Ramos has been talking in glowing terms of his team and its adventures at the ...
What's this? A goalkeeper penalized for rough play?     
Meet Sorin Stoica. Maybe you've seen him in action during MLS games. Not a highly paid ...
Scots wha hae! Thoughts on the sad and ominous decline of Scottish soccer    
I note, with considerable exasperation tempered by sadness, that Scottish soccer is experimenting with a marvelous ...
Celebrity coaches -- who needs them?     
I am still finding it difficult to come to terms with the extraordinary way in which ...
Wenger must stay -- even the stats agree     
Arsene Wenger should stay. That's what I think. And I think that way because I respect ...
Violent Goalkeeping (Part 2): FIFA must radically rethink the goalkeeper's role    
Last time, I asked: "What action has soccer taken to at least reduce the incidence of ...
>> SoccerTalk with Paul Gardner Archives