Join Now  | 
Home About Contact Us Privacy & Security Advertise
Soccer America Daily Soccer World Daily Special Edition Around The Net Soccer Business Insider College Soccer Reporter Youth Soccer Reporter Soccer on TV Soccer America Classifieds Game Report
Paul Gardner: SoccerTalk Soccer America Confidential Youth Soccer Insider World Cup Watch
RSS Feeds Archives Manage Subscriptions Subscribe
Order Current Issue Subscribe Manage My Subscription Renew My Subscription Gift Subscription
My Account Join Now
Tournament Calendar Camps & Academies Soccer Glossary Classifieds
Blame the EPL, not American owners
by Paul Kennedy, October 7th, 2010 12:48AM
Subscribe to Soccer America Daily

MOST READ
TAGS:  england

MOST COMMENTED

[MY VIEW] Wednesday's news that one American group will succeed another as the owner of Liverpool, one of the most revered clubs in English soccer, brought more moans and groans from the other side of the Atlantic, where American owners are vilified. But English critics are barking up the wrong tree if they think American owners are the problem.

Liverpool has been on a downward spiral since Americans Tom Hicks and George Gillett bought the club in 2007. The Reds reached a new low last weekend when they lost at home to lowly Blackpool and fell in the relegation zone.

"Built by Shanks, Broke by Yanks" read one of the banners at Anfield, referring to legendary manager Bill Shankly and Hicks and Gillett.

Liverpool's problems weren't its owners, American or otherwise, but the English Premier League, which allowed Hicks and Gillett to buy the club with borrowed money. Just as it allowed the Glazer family to buy Manchester United with borrowed money.

Both deals proved disastrous when the world financial markets crumbled in late 2008, leaving the owners with no one willing to refinance their loans on favorable terms.

Until the EPL tightens it ownership rules like those that exist in American sports, it will have no one to blame but itself the next time a club is thrown into crisis like Liverpool has been.



0 comments
  1. Brian Herbert
    commented on: October 7, 2010 at 11:33 a.m.
    Absolutely right. Sports franchises are very different from a "real" business, and even real businesses get over-leveraged with debt. I think history shows sports franchises are best owned by one or more wealthy individuals putting in THEIR OWN money.

Sign in to leave a comment. Don't have an account? Join Now




AUTHORS

ARCHIVES
FOLLOW SOCCERAMERICA

Recent Soccer America Daily
What They're Saying: Ronald de Boer    
"It's very difficult to find action photos of Frank, that's why they use me instead.”-- A ...
Video Pick: Pogba does a dab while scoring    
Paul Pogba, playing in a charity game host by his former Juventus teammate Juan Cuadrado in ...
Gold Cup: Six players who could benefit from big summers    
In Bruce Arena's first two World Cup cycles, players like DaMarcus Beasley and Clint Dempsey (still ...
What They're Saying: Miguel Layun    
"We believe in him because he believes in us. It's difficult to understand that someone from ...
USL Rewind: Battery's Williams takes scoring lead    
Romario Williams took over the USL scoring lead ahead of fellow Jamaican Dane Kelly (Reno) by ...
MLS Power Rankings: Busy week yields little movement    
The top four teams held their places by winning and mixed results for most of the ...
NWSL Rewind: Ohai 'devastated' by knee injury    
Houston Dash forward Kealia Ohai, who tied for the most goals in the NWSL with 11 ...
Roster: U.S. U-20 women head to England & Germany     
Coach Jitka Klimkova is taking a U.S. U-20 women's national team squad of 24 on a ...
Datebook: Open Cup round-of-16 schedule (streaming)    
The Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup moves into the round of 16 on Tuesday when FC ...
What They're Saying: Massimo Busacca    
"Up until now, decision are made in the heat of the moment. This is a new ...
>> Soccer America Daily Archives