Join Now  | 
Home About Contact Us Privacy & Security Advertise
Soccer America Daily Soccer World Daily Special Edition Around The Net Soccer Business Insider College Soccer Reporter Youth Soccer Reporter Soccer on TV Soccer America Classifieds Game Report
Paul Gardner: SoccerTalk Soccer America Confidential Youth Soccer Insider World Cup Watch
RSS Feeds Archives Manage Subscriptions Subscribe
Order Current Issue Subscribe Manage My Subscription Renew My Subscription Gift Subscription
My Account Join Now
Tournament Calendar Camps & Academies Soccer Glossary Classifieds
Can we laugh off England's pill-popping in Poland?
by Paul Gardner, October 20th, 2012 1:34AM
Subscribe to SoccerTalk with Paul Gardner

TAGS:  england


By Paul Gardner

So England produced a lethargic performance against Poland last Wednesday because the players had been taking sleeping pills. Sounds quite possible -- after all, that’s what sleeping pills are supposed to do. Make you sleepy.

And why would England players want to feel sleepy? You can blame the Poles for that. The Poland vs. England game was supposed to be played on Tuesday, in a lovely new stadium with a retractable roof that keeps out the rain. There was plenty of rain on Tuesday, buckets of it, but the Poles left the roof open.

Human error. The rain gods took full advantage and swamped the playing field. So the game had to be postponed until Wednesday.

Ahah! -- things get murkier at this point. The English players, you see, were all hyped-up for Tuesday -- for an event that didn’t happen. In this state of frustrated hyped-upness, how were they to sleep on Tuesday night, then?

A mild sleeping pill would do the trick. So that’s what some of the players took. Possibly they had the pills in their baggage, or it could even be that the England medical staff provided them -- that might well be a good idea, if it otherwise meant players having a restless night before a big game.

But as more became known, attention switched from chemicals that were used to induce sleep, to chemicals that might -- probably were -- used to induce the hyped-up state. That sounds like doping, no? The use of performance-enhancing drugs. Not quite ... because the hype-up drug of choice among soccer players (and no doubt all other athletes) these days is caffeine. A drug we all know about, a homely, comfortable sort of drug, the one that helps to make both coffee and tea such welcome drinks.

These days there’s a whole range of caffeine products on the market -- all available without prescription -- whose active ingredient is caffeine. Most of these products are “energy drinks” (Red Bull is a prime example) and they unabashedly advertise the fact that they make you function better -- in the office, at home, as a person and so on. Oddly, none of them actually mentions performing better at sports. Red Bull comes close, proclaiming that the product “has been developed for people who want to have a clear and focused mind, perform physically ...”

The evidence is -- as it usually is when trying to measure performance -- unclear. But plenty of athletes believe that caffeine does help, and they use the products. So how come these athletes don’t fail drug tests then?

Because caffeine, assuredly a stimulant, is not on the list of banned substances issued yearly by WADA (the World Anti-Doping Agency). Quite an omission from a list that names over 60 stimulants. WADA used to ban caffeine, but policing and monitoring such a widely -- and innocently -- used drug proved an impossible task. So, in 2004, caffeine was taken off the list.

Now we know, what we already did sort of know, that top players -- in this case member of England’s national team -- hype themselves up with pre-game doses of caffeine. We know because Liverpool’s Glen Johnson told the BBC that “A lot of the lads take Pro Plus tablets [caffeine tablets] before the game and then the game is off and no-one can sleep ...” Hence the sleeping pills and the drowsy game against Poland.

The tendency, I think, will be to laugh this one off. My own inclination is to do just that. After all, everyone does it, it’s not illegal, it’s not dangerous. Well, provided the guys don’t run riot with high dosages, that is.

And there’s no escaping that the way in which caffeine has been sort of “grandfathered” off the prohibited list does make a mockery of that list. My own feeling about doping is a mixed one -- I’m against it in principle, but I see extraordinary difficulties and contradictions involved in trying to define exactly what doping is, trying to separate nutritional aids from performance enhancers, trying to work out if bans based on dosage might be feasible, and then trying to enforce stringent anti-doping regulations.

If there were any doubts about the difficulties of enforcement, they have probably been banished by the recent revelations in the sad tale of Lance Armstrong.

Whatever one’s opinion about ingesting drinks or supplements or pills to win games, there remains a stigma -- not necessarily a logical one -- attached to such practices. If it’s OK to use caffeine products, then why shouldn’t one do it openly and fess up to what one is doing? Glenn Johnson has done just that (naively, one suspects), but his honesty will not be widely admired or copied.

The product Pro Plus is advertised as pills that will “relieve the symptoms of fatigue and tiredness and help you feel awake.” The ads mention “busy professionals and students” as people likely to get help from a two-pill dose (containing 100mg of caffeine -- “equivalent to a strong cup of coffee”). Pro Plus can also help you to “concentrate and be more alert.”

Pro Plus now has a great opportunity to boost its sales by letting the world know that it is widely used by top England players, and by getting those players to star in commercials. Will it take advantage of that opportunity? Come to that, will it offer the English FA a nice chunk of money to be recognized as the “official energy pill” of the England squad?

No it will not. All around, there is the feeling that the England players have been caught doing something naughty, something that shouldn’t be shared with outsiders.

In fact, the most surprising part of this imbroglio is that we have yet to hear a straight-faced, stern-voiced pronouncement from the FA saying that it, and its medical department, thoroughly disapprove of caffeine taking.

  1. Jorge Giraldo
    commented on: October 20, 2012 at 6:28 a.m.
    Hmm not a comment about the game or an exciting week in world cup qualifiers.... nope this self proclaimed "soccer guru" " benefit for america"; once again wastes our time but attacking England, do your research lots of other teams are doing it too... including your beloved Barca.... ohh wait they are not english team therefore you are not going to say anything.... like the previous comment "yikes" cant believe you get paid for your constant hate towards the English
  1. Jogo Bonito
    commented on: October 20, 2012 at 7:22 a.m.
    Interesting stuff indeed. It's a soccer issue for sure. I have seen players drinking energy drinks at halftime! It can't be good for them. PG always makes me think. Every good writer should have the same goal. It's not about agreeing or disagreeing. It's about exapanding your thoughts. PG neve disappoints when it comes to that. This column makes me think that rules should be made with deeper thought and foresight. Of course, caffeine is just as bad or worse than many banned drugs, but i think trying to ban caffeine is a tough one and perhaps could hurt advertising maybe. I do know that Diego Maradona had a drug problem, but what he got kicked out of the 1994 WC for testing positive for Ephedrine. It can be argued that compared to the boost you get from the over counter energy drinks and supplements today's players legally use, we need to think about how effective these rules are.
  1. Eric Offner
    commented on: October 20, 2012 at 9:31 a.m.
    Mr Gardner Another good column I consider you and Brian Glanville the best soccer writers for many generations. Soccer America and World Soccer afford me the opportunity to read your columns Thank you Eric Offner
  1. Jorge Giraldo
    commented on: October 20, 2012 at 12:41 p.m.
    indeed Good Column!!! just too much of attacks towards FA
  1. Futbol Genio
    commented on: October 21, 2012 at 4:45 p.m.
    Heart attacks are nothing to laugh at since we have had many in recent years: Speed+Heart palpitations+Ignorance=Player Harm. Don't care who does it, but history tells us better stop now!
  1. Ramon Creager
    commented on: October 24, 2012 at 8:55 a.m.
    I recall a Myth Busters episode that tested the idea that energy drinks can improve performance (and other ideas, that it can make a drunk sober, etc.). As I recall it did not do so significantly. This matches my own experience when I used to play regularly (tried strong coffee a few times). If your juices aren't flowing by the 10th minute or so, you're dead anyway. I think this will pass on its own, as players figure out there is little advantage gained. We might have to work through this generation of young players who've been targeted by Monster and Red Bull ads.

Sign in to leave a comment. Don't have an account? Join Now



Recent SoccerTalk with Paul Gardner
The triumphant return of Bruce Arena    
Well, take that Jurgen Klinsmann. Never at any time during his five years in charge of ...
MLS games compare well with EPL but referees in both leagues reluctant to call PKs    
During this past weekend, I watched -- on television, of course -- 15 games. Well, not ...
Of tattoos and voodoo and science ... and soccer    
My calendar says March 1. But, quite possibly, global warming has advanced things. The weather is ...
Suddenly, the sport itself rebels against low-scoring Scrooge soccer    
We haven't seen anything like this for quite a while. In fact it was beginning to ...
Pep snubs Kun -- modern soccer at its worst    
Back in 2005 the word from Argentina was that maybe -- of course maybe -- a ...
Where soccer fails, the NFL gets it right    
An impertinent book, this. The title and subtitle tell you succinctly what you are getting: "The ...
More urgent than Van Basten's rule changes: soccer needs a total reversal of referees' negative mindset    
The problem is this. To praise Marco van Basten for speaking out on a topic that ...
Clearance: an ugly play, a useless stat     
For some time now I have been wondering about the soccer term "clearance." A term, admittedly, ...
Roberto Cabanas & the Beautiful Game    
From the happiest of thoughts and memories about Roberto Cabanas to total bewilderment and sadness ...
Soccer & Concussion (Part 2): What needs to be done -- before the lawyers move in     
The suspect nature of the enforcement of protocols is by no means the only barrier to ...
>> SoccerTalk with Paul Gardner Archives