Join Now  | 
Home About Contact Us Privacy & Security Advertise
Soccer America Daily Soccer World Daily Special Edition Around The Net Soccer Business Insider College Soccer Reporter Youth Soccer Reporter Soccer on TV Soccer America Classifieds Game Report
Paul Gardner: SoccerTalk Soccer America Confidential Youth Soccer Insider World Cup Watch
RSS Feeds Archives Manage Subscriptions Subscribe
Order Current Issue Subscribe Manage My Subscription Renew My Subscription Gift Subscription
My Account Join Now
Tournament Calendar Camps & Academies Soccer Glossary Classifieds
World Cup conundrum is huge political test for Gulati
by Paul Kennedy, September 18th, 2013 12:29AM
Subscribe to Soccer America Daily

TAGS:  world cup 2022


[QATAR 2022] About the only thing for certain about the 2022 World Cup is that it won't played in the summer in Qatar. If, as FIFA president Sepp Blatter proposes, the tournament is moved to the winter in Qatar, the move won't take place without a fight. Just how much a fight U.S. Soccer president Sunil Gulati puts up makes this one of the biggest tests he'll face in his new position as a member of the FIFA executive committee.

Frank Lowy
, the billionaire chief of Football Federation Australia, became the latest person to step forward, saying FIFA shouldn't rush into a decision and saying his organization will want the $40 million it invested in its bid back if the FIFA executive committee gives the green light to a switch at its October meeting.

Lowy's remarks came a day after Fox Sports issued a statement condemning FIFA's plans, saying it bid for the 2018 and 2022 World Cup rights on the basis that the tournaments be played in the summer, not winter.

If FIFA were to switch the dates of the 2022 World Cup, it would have to play the tournament in the November-December period instead of January-February because of the conflict with the 2022 Winter Olympics. For Fox, November-December poses a huge programming conflict of its own: NFL and, to a lesser extent, college football.

U.S. television rights to the World Cup have exploded in recent years, and Fox paid $425 million for the 2018-22 package, blowing out of the water the bid of longtime rights holder ESPN for the English-language rights.

"FIFA has informed us that they are considering and voting on moving the 2022 World Cup," Fox said in a statement. "Fox Sports bought the World Cup rights with the understanding they would be in the summer as they have been since the 1930s."

If Fox were to pull out or demand a rebate, it would cost FIFA millions of dollars.

Lowy said FIFA should study any change in timing or venue before making a decision.

"FIFA has an opportunity now to make the best of a bad situation by embarking on a transparent and orderly approach, unlike the process that led to the original flawed decision in December 2010," Lowy said in a statement.

Gulati has came out against making a decision next month.

“I don’t see at this stage, frankly, how I or any member of FIFA’s executive committee could make a sensible decision,” he told the New York Times. “We don’t have enough information, and there are too many questions. I don’t see how anybody in a position of responsibility can take a position without some answers.”

Up until now, the most vehement opposition to a winter World Cup has come from the English Premier League, which generates far more money than any other league in the world but also plays right through the winter.

There are many reasons for Gulati to oppose a switch in timing -- MLS, for one, could lose up to two months of its 2022 season -- and demand a re-vote on the 2022 host -- for which the USA would be the favorite -- but the USA would be in a position to earn enormous political capital for a 2026 bid if it signed off on some kind of 2022 Qatar compromise. (Clouding the political picture is that FIFA has taken away the World Cup rights vote from the executive committee and given it to its 208 members.)

Australia, or Japan and South Korea, the other original 2022 World Cup bidders, wouldn't benefit from any such compromise as the current FIFA regulations prevent the World Cup from going to a country in the same confederation more than once every three cycles.

Russia 2018 and Qatar 2022 mean that European and Asian countries wouldn't be eligible to bid for 2026, clearing the deck for a U.S. victory that eluded it in its 2022 campaign because of the massive lobbying by Qatar, which swayed a majority of the FIFA executive committee that it should host the 2022 tournament in the face of FIFA's own report suggesting that holding the tournament in the summer posed considerable dangers.

  1. R2 Dad
    commented on: September 18, 2013 at 12:56 a.m.
    “I don’t see at this stage, frankly, how I or any member of FIFA’s executive committee could make a sensible decision,” he told the New York Times. “We don’t have enough information, and there are too many questions. I don’t see how anybody in a position of responsibility can take a position without some answers.” Sunil, apparently you don't know how the game is played. Blatter asks the rhetorical question and you do as you are told. I actually think the US should refuse to host another World Cup unless FIFA begs AND pays. There are lots of other countries that would 'benefit' more. Bhutan (207), South Sudan (205), Somalia (201). If hosting is such a great deal, let Blatter sign them all up first in the name of diversity and opportunity.
  1. nick p
    commented on: September 18, 2013 at 2:34 a.m.
    What are the chances it actually gets taken away from Qatar and thrown over to the USA
  1. Eric Schmitt
    commented on: September 18, 2013 at 8:15 a.m.
    Fox's argument is totally legitimate and will further muddy the waters. Fox wants no part of trying to do WC coverage in the middle of American football season, and they paid *lots* of money for those rights. Money is a language FIFA speaks fluently, and they may have to pay attention. Sepp and Co are in serious trouble here.
  1. Amos Annan
    commented on: September 18, 2013 at 8:58 a.m.
    Money is the driver for all these decisions.
  1. Gus Keri
    commented on: September 18, 2013 at 9:40 a.m.
    I agree money is the driving force behind this argument. and by the way, this is no issue for the Qatari's. They will pay all these hundreds of millions of dollars in a minute.
  1. Gus Keri
    commented on: September 18, 2013 at 9:42 a.m.
    And I forgot to mention that Al-Jazeera will be willing to take the responsibility of broadcasting the games in the USA from Fox.
  1. Walt Pericciuoli
    commented on: September 18, 2013 at 10:39 a.m.
    $ I don't see $ how these $ games will $ be taken away from $$$$ Qatar $$$$ nor played at any other period $$$ other than summer$$$. Players and fans be dammed.
  1. Dan Phillips
    commented on: September 18, 2013 at 11:29 a.m.
    Move the games to the USA where they should have been staged in the first place. Who the hell is Qatar? Never even heard of it as a country. Stupid to hold games there!
  1. David Huff
    commented on: September 18, 2013 at 11:34 a.m.
    FIFA's hand needs to be forced on this, they wanted Quatar in Summer 2022 and thats exactly what they should receive. We can send our 'B' team to add mockery to the farce this event has become.
    commented on: September 18, 2013 at 1:55 p.m.
    What happened to the air conditioned stadia Qatar proposed? They can afford them. At least it would make it easier to get tickets for your favourite side, with the matches in a place the size of LA.
  1. Gus Keri
    commented on: September 18, 2013 at 3:17 p.m.
    To be fair to the Qatari's, they never complained. They are preparing to build air-conditioned stadiums and fans' area. But people are complaining that you can't air-condition the whole country. Apparently, some want even the streets and beaches of Qatar air-conditioned.
    commented on: September 18, 2013 at 4:57 p.m.
    But I bet it's like Phoenix-a dry heat......beaches come water conditioned......maybe hotels will not be as jacked if northerners are afraid they will wilt....
  1. Daniel Clifton
    commented on: September 19, 2013 at 11:02 a.m.
    Whatever happened to the building of closed in stadiums. I thought that was the plan, not playing in the desert heat in open air stadiums. It is 9 years away. Plenty of time to build the stadiums needed. Maybe it will cost too much? What a mess? Fox will have to gear up their attorneys for a breach of contract lawsuit. Oh darn!

Sign in to leave a comment. Don't have an account? Join Now



Recent Soccer America Daily
Streaming: Fox Sports will air UCL games on Facebook    
UEFA became the latest organization to start streaming on Facebook, teaming with U.S. broadcaster Fox Sports ...
OTT: What NBC's new EPL package means for viewers    
NBC Sports Digital has announced a new "Premier League Pass" as part of its NBC Sports ...
What They're Saying: Ronald de Boer    
"It's very difficult to find action photos of Frank, that's why they use me instead.”-- A ...
Video Pick: Pogba does a dab while scoring    
Paul Pogba, playing in a charity game host by his former Juventus teammate Juan Cuadrado in ...
Gold Cup: Six players who could benefit from big summers    
In Bruce Arena's first two World Cup cycles, players like DaMarcus Beasley and Clint Dempsey (still ...
What They're Saying: Miguel Layun    
"We believe in him because he believes in us. It's difficult to understand that someone from ...
USL Rewind: Battery's Williams takes scoring lead    
Romario Williams took over the USL scoring lead ahead of fellow Jamaican Dane Kelly (Reno) by ...
MLS Power Rankings: Busy week yields little movement    
The top four teams held their places by winning and mixed results for most of the ...
NWSL Rewind: Ohai 'devastated' by knee injury    
Houston Dash forward Kealia Ohai, who tied for the most goals in the NWSL with 11 ...
Roster: U.S. U-20 women head to England & Germany     
Coach Jitka Klimkova is taking a U.S. U-20 women's national team squad of 24 on a ...
>> Soccer America Daily Archives