Join Now  | 
Home About Contact Us Privacy & Security Advertise
Soccer America Daily Soccer World Daily Special Edition Around The Net Soccer Business Insider College Soccer Reporter Youth Soccer Reporter Soccer on TV Soccer America Classifieds Game Report
Paul Gardner: SoccerTalk Soccer America Confidential Youth Soccer Insider World Cup Watch
RSS Feeds Archives Manage Subscriptions Subscribe
Order Current Issue Subscribe Manage My Subscription Renew My Subscription Gift Subscription
My Account Join Now
Tournament Calendar Camps & Academies Soccer Glossary Classifieds
Should refs be hawks or doves at playoff time?
by Paul Gardner, November 11th, 2013 12:20PM
Subscribe to SoccerTalk with Paul Gardner

TAGS:  houston dynamo, kansas city wizards, mls, referees


By Paul Gardner

'Tis the season, or postseason anyway, of playoff soccer. Whatever that means. The phrase gets repeated and repeated -- the TV guys love it, of course, without giving us any clear explanation of what they mean.

Obviously, there ought to be such an animal as playoff soccer. These are much more pressure-filled games than the regular-season contests. You can’t really afford to lose even one of them. So -- over the course of 90 or 120 minutes -- there’s much more knife-edge stuff than you get during regular season games.

That much is pretty obvious. What is not so clear is how each team -- each coach, I suppose it is -- chooses to react. In a two-game series -- do you play the first game cautiously? Well, that depends -- on whether it’s a home or a road game, for example. With away goals not counting, is there any point in taking risks trying to score them? Isn’t a tie good enough? Which might well lead to a negative, defensive bore of a game. Is that playoff soccer?

Or maybe things depend on whether you feel pretty superior to the opponents (and given that the initial matchups depend on seeding, you might well feel that). Or whether, because of injuries and suspensions, you have something less than a full team available. Or whether they do.

Or, as has been the case this year with the Houston Dynamo, maybe you’ve hit a schedule logjam (seven games in 17 days even sounds exhausting). So when Houston ran up against Sporting Kansas City (who had played, as had Houston, an overtime game only three days earlier) it was not a setup that promised much in the way of sparkling soccer.

And so it proved. This was dire stuff, and of course there were injuries, which is what you expect when tired bodies are being pushed to the limit. So, was this labored, often crude game, a typical example of playoff soccer?

Hardly -- but it did let us know that trying to make out that playoff soccer can be neatly defined is really a waste of time. As is usually the case with soccer, there are simply too many variables. I’ve already mentioned some -- let me add another highly important one. Refereeing. After all, referees will feel the extra pressure every bit as much as the players. If playoff soccer is held to take on a special, more vital nature, surely the refereeing should respond to that?

But in what way? By becoming more lenient, perhaps -- on the grounds that the more committed play will inevitably mean more physical contact, and that most of it will be minor and should be ignored by the referee. To call every “coming together” of players would hopelessly fragment the game, so “let ‘em play” becomes the refereeing order of the day?

Or should the opposite approach be applied, with the referee -- particularly early in the game -- strictly calling every foul, to let the players know that they will not be getting away with borderline reckless tackles? One wonders what PRO has to say about this.

One officiating aspect that ought not to be altered in any way, of course, is the referee’s response to serious fouls. If anything, the referee should become more severe on these calls during playoffs.

But that was not what we saw from the highly experienced Kevin Stott during that Houston-Kansas City game. If there be hawks and doves among referees, then Stott played the dove in the 72nd minute, when he turned a blind eye to a clear foul by Kansas City’s Aurelien Collin. In the Kansas City penalty area. I say “clear” because there were no other players around, it was just Collin and Houston’s Cam Weaver. Stott was some 25 yards away, not ideally positioned, which meant that he may have had his sight line impeded. But no one was blocking the sight line of his AR, who had a perfect view as Collin stepped heavily on Weaver’s right foot and, in effect, tripped him.

Stott made no call. But one didn’t need the replay to show solid contact, a blatant foul, and a penalty kick to Houston ... but not if you’re refereeing with the “let ‘em play” motif running through your mind.

The ideal, of course, is that there should be no such thing as “playoff refereeing” -- because refereeing should be consistently good and of a consistent style in both regular season and playoff games. But penalty kicks are always likely to be the ultimate test. It is surely clear that referees do not like giving them, especially when -- as here -- they are likely to decide a key game. A penalty kick means the likelihood of a goal, and in the playoffs -- I’d say crucially in this Houston-Kansas series -- a botched call can have very damaging, maybe fatal, influence. Houston has every reason to consider itself hard done by.

  1. Brian Something
    commented on: November 11, 2013 at 1:02 p.m.
    What does the rule book say about how "playoff soccer" should be called as compared to "regular" soccer? Nothing, you say? Well there's your answer.
  1. John Soares
    commented on: November 11, 2013 at 2:07 p.m.
    You answered your own question, last paragraph. A referee calls his best game EVERY game. Regular, playoff or championship.... NO changes.
  1. Kent James
    commented on: November 11, 2013 at 2:30 p.m.
    I think the word most appreciated by players, coaches, fans is consistency. Refs will miss calls (or make bad ones) but consistency keeps the playing field level and allows everyone to play by the same rules, so that should be the goal.
  1. Millwall America
    commented on: November 11, 2013 at 3:35 p.m.
    I'll add my voice to the chorus -- the enforcement of the rules shouldn't change regardless of playoffs or regular season. I'm not too fussed about exactly how they're enforced (strict or lenient) as long as they're always enforced the same way in the same league. As for the Houston game being "labored, often crude" a Dynamo fan let me just say that has nothing to do with the playoffs. That's just the Dynamo.
  1. R2 Dad
    commented on: November 11, 2013 at 11:45 p.m.
    Not caring. The Houston Earthquakes deserve getting the raw end of the deal because MLS sold out the San Jose fans when they moved the franchise, an indefensible bush-league move. And I'm still butt-hurt. BTW, consistent refereeing requires published goals and pronouncements, referee training, public feedback on how the referees performed, possibly a publicized end-of-year scorecard. PRO may choose not to do any of those things, but the credibility of the league is at stake so they themselves need to raise the bar rather than obfuscate.
  1. I w Nowozeniuk
    commented on: November 12, 2013 at 8:46 a.m.
    Play-offs or regular season, the laws of the game apply the same way. Yet, the MLS brand of refereeing remains inconsistent; 10+ yard cheating on throw-ins, defensive walls encroaching, passes for fouls from the rear, wrestling matches on corner kicks, etc. It all leads to the head of referees.
  1. P Chambers
    commented on: November 13, 2013 at 3:25 p.m.
    Early on in any match, overcall simply to let players know their limits.

Sign in to leave a comment. Don't have an account? Join Now



Recent SoccerTalk with Paul Gardner
The Gnat's Eyebrow and other VAR stupidities     
The trial of video-assistance for referees currently under way at the Confederations Cup in Russia cannot ...
That Goal    
It was Pele who started the "soccer is beauty" theme. He titled his autobiography -- one ...
Tab Ramos paints a rosy American future in the changing U-20 World Cup -- but a U-18 World Cup would make more sense     
Tab Ramos has been talking in glowing terms of his team and its adventures at the ...
What's this? A goalkeeper penalized for rough play?     
Meet Sorin Stoica. Maybe you've seen him in action during MLS games. Not a highly paid ...
Scots wha hae! Thoughts on the sad and ominous decline of Scottish soccer    
I note, with considerable exasperation tempered by sadness, that Scottish soccer is experimenting with a marvelous ...
Celebrity coaches -- who needs them?     
I am still finding it difficult to come to terms with the extraordinary way in which ...
Wenger must stay -- even the stats agree     
Arsene Wenger should stay. That's what I think. And I think that way because I respect ...
Violent Goalkeeping (Part 2): FIFA must radically rethink the goalkeeper's role    
Last time, I asked: "What action has soccer taken to at least reduce the incidence of ...
Violent Goalkeeping (Part 1): Players at risk as soccer ignores its own rules    
Goalkeepers, we are told, need protection. No doubt we all agree. Up to a point.
The triumphant return of Bruce Arena    
Well, take that Jurgen Klinsmann. Never at any time during his five years in charge of ...
>> SoccerTalk with Paul Gardner Archives