Join Now  | 
Home About Contact Us Privacy & Security Advertise
Soccer America Daily Soccer World Daily Special Edition Around The Net Soccer Business Insider College Soccer Reporter Youth Soccer Reporter Soccer on TV Soccer America Classifieds Game Report
Paul Gardner: SoccerTalk Soccer America Confidential Youth Soccer Insider World Cup Watch
RSS Feeds Archives Manage Subscriptions Subscribe
Order Current Issue Subscribe Manage My Subscription Renew My Subscription Gift Subscription
My Account Join Now
Tournament Calendar Camps & Academies Soccer Glossary Classifieds
A Soccer Rarity -- A Triumph for Common Sense
by Paul Gardner, July 23rd, 2015 2:31AM
Subscribe to SoccerTalk with Paul Gardner

TAGS:  referees


There are three heroes in this story -- though heroes is really much too dramatic a word. Three good guys, then, who saw that something was wrong in soccer, did something about it, and got things put right.

Referee Randy Vogt, who first drew attention to the problem of skin cancer for referees who do a lot of reffing in the sunshine but don’t wear caps. Journalist Mike Woitalla, my esteemed colleague on Soccer America, who is also a referee -- he pounced on the story, followed it up, did the research, and made a virtually water-tight case for referees to wear some sort of headgear. And USSF President Sunil Gulati, who quickly saw the validity and cogency of Woitalla’s argument, and had the Federation issue a well-worded statement saying it was OK for refs to wear hats.

Of course, I’m amazed that everything went so smoothly. I’ve had my attempts to get rules or practices changed in soccer and have invariably been met -- especially when referees are involved -- with mulishly negative responses. Which, of course, may simply mean that Woitalla is a much more convincing advocate than I am. Quite possibly, I’d say.

Woitalla first faced a situation that I recognize only too well -- that referees, in general, were "obeying" a rule that didn't exist. They were not wearing caps because they believed the rules banned them. No, they couldn’t cite chapter and verse, but that was the accepted practice.

It didn’t say “no hats” in the rulebook, but Woitalla dug up some official “guidelines” that ruled out headgear. But nothing too recent -- in other words, the written authority for a ban on hats was shaky.

This is something that has long exasperated me about referees -- that they obey “rules” that are not really rules at all, rather practice that has become accepted over time, and is simply not questioned ... when it should be. My #1 irritation in this category is the notion that, in close calls, the “benefit of doubt” should be given to the defensive player. A poor idea, for which there is no justification at all.

But Woitalla was able to expose the flimsiness of the no-hats argument. More: He was able to cite serious cases of referees who had suffered skin cancer of the scalp. So far so good -- but even good ideas (maybe it’s especially the good ideas -- yes, I’m thinking of some of my brainwaves) have a habit of simply fading away when they reach the upper levels of soccer authority. But here we are talking about a potentially life-saving idea. It was not to be denied.

In no time at all, Gulati made his move. Hats are OK -- at least in the USA -- and advice on the use of sun screens is included in the Federation statement.

This whole incident carries, for me, a significant reminder of the importance of the press. The sport itself, the FIFA Medical Committee, the Referees Committee were all in a position to take action on this vital issue, yet they did not. In the end, it was an alert journalist who got things moving. Journalists do have a role to play in the development of the sport.

Which is what makes it so sad to listen to the TV commentators, very few of whom have any journalistic training at all. Without that training, that outlook, that ability to recognize a true story (and, please, not a marketing celebrity story), they will never be able to contribute to the sport in the way that Mike Woitalla -- with terrific assists from Randy Vogt and Sunil Gulati -- has done over the headwear issue.

  1. Scott Johnson
    commented on: July 23, 2015 at 3:47 a.m.
    IIRC, the "rule" that a player who is sent off may not be replaced with a substitute, is nowhere within the Laws of the Game. While the Laws discuss sending off quite a bit, and explicitly state that a) a player sent off before the start of the match may be replaced by a substitute; and b) a substitute (i.e. a player on the bench but eligible to participate) sent off may not be replaced by a player not on the official game roster; nowhere do the laws state that a player expelled during the game cannot be replaced. Instead, this is a longstanding soccer tradition that is simply known to all, despite not being mentioned in the rules. (It's a legacy from the days when no substitutes were allowed at all; when the laws were changed to allow them, this was not explicitly addressed, so old custom prevailed. Even in youth soccer, which generally allows unlimited substitutions, sent-off players are not replaced).
  1. Kyr-Roger St.-Denis
    commented on: July 23, 2015 at 10:52 a.m.
    "I’ve had my attempts to get rules or practices changed in soccer and have invariably been met ... with mulishly negative responses. Which, of course, may simply mean that Woitalla is a much more convincing advocate than I am. Quite possibly, I’d say." Or to put it another way: maybe it's because Gardner is always such a smug ass.
  1. Ginger Peeler
    commented on: July 23, 2015 at 3:20 p.m.
    I do think Taylor Twellman has contributed to the U.S. soccer family as a commentator with is stand on concussions. He was very explicit during the World Cup about concussion protocol needed during games. There were at least 2 games where concussed players stayed in the game. But in MLS now, the announcers have discussed a minimum 3 minute period protocol when players must be evaluated for a possible concussion. I think Twellman had a major role in that happening.
  1. Brian Something
    commented on: July 25, 2015 at 12:33 p.m.
    A rare triumph for common sense indeed. It's not an understatement to say that Woitalla's and Vogt's collaboration will save lives.

Sign in to leave a comment. Don't have an account? Join Now



Recent SoccerTalk with Paul Gardner
That Goal    
It was Pele who started the "soccer is beauty" theme. He titled his autobiography -- one ...
Tab Ramos paints a rosy American future in the changing U-20 World Cup -- but a U-18 World Cup would make more sense     
Tab Ramos has been talking in glowing terms of his team and its adventures at the ...
What's this? A goalkeeper penalized for rough play?     
Meet Sorin Stoica. Maybe you've seen him in action during MLS games. Not a highly paid ...
Scots wha hae! Thoughts on the sad and ominous decline of Scottish soccer    
I note, with considerable exasperation tempered by sadness, that Scottish soccer is experimenting with a marvelous ...
Celebrity coaches -- who needs them?     
I am still finding it difficult to come to terms with the extraordinary way in which ...
Wenger must stay -- even the stats agree     
Arsene Wenger should stay. That's what I think. And I think that way because I respect ...
Violent Goalkeeping (Part 2): FIFA must radically rethink the goalkeeper's role    
Last time, I asked: "What action has soccer taken to at least reduce the incidence of ...
Violent Goalkeeping (Part 1): Players at risk as soccer ignores its own rules    
Goalkeepers, we are told, need protection. No doubt we all agree. Up to a point.
The triumphant return of Bruce Arena    
Well, take that Jurgen Klinsmann. Never at any time during his five years in charge of ...
MLS games compare well with EPL but referees in both leagues reluctant to call PKs    
During this past weekend, I watched -- on television, of course -- 15 games. Well, not ...
>> SoccerTalk with Paul Gardner Archives