By law, they are boys, even though they left
home in January.
The U.S. U-17 program has been around since 1985. In 1998, the U.S. Soccer Federation began referring to its under-17 team as a "men's" national team. Coincidentally, or
not, that's also the year the federation created the residency program and invested $1.5 million in the 1999 world championship effort.
Sound like a lot of money? Yes and no.
a lot more than other nations spend on their youth teams, but it's comparable to what international clubs spend on their youth development programs.
For example, Norwich, a second-tier
English league team, budgets $722,000 a year on its youth program. That matches the U-17 investment, which was spread over two years.
Liverpool spends $2.4 million on its hopefuls. Ajax
Amsterdam's renowned youth program is in that range, and its mission is to graduate two players to the First Division team every two years.
These foreign pro clubs get a return if they
produce a star or two, either by selling the player or saving the cash it would take to buy one.
Why does U.S. Soccer do it?
Before MLS, the federation treated its national team
like a club, with full-time contracts and endless training camps. Now the team functions like the rest of the world's.
The single-entity structure, NCAA rules and its overall precarious
state currently prevent MLS from developing young players.
U.S. Soccer has to carry the burden of providing the tools for young Americans. When they really do become men, they'll help the
U.S. become a soccer power. And that will create a handsome return.
FANS, LET'S HEAR YOUR VIEW Click here to log onto (Soccer) American Graffiti. Then click on the topic titled "YOUR VIEW: Boys to men" and respond to MIKE WOITALLA in 200 words or less. Best responses may be reprinted in Soccer America Magazine. If YOUR View is selected, we'll send you a cool T-shirt and pin... Because You're FANATIC.