By Paul Gardner
Arsenal's Eduardo got on to the field in the 79th minute of Saturday's game against Manchester United. His entry was greeted by shouts of "Cheat!" from
the Man U fans, and Eduardo was duly booed each time he played the ball.
Certainly, not all the Man U fans behaved like morons, but enough did to make themselves heard. What made Eduardo
stink in the nostrils of the less delectable Man U fans was the accusation that he had dived in a game against Glasgow Celtic earlier in the week, and had won an undeserved penalty.
event that, obviously, has nothing to do with Man U. But such has been the ferocity with which the English press has seized the accusation, that Eduardo now plays soccer rather like David Copperfield
attended school -- with a sign around his neck. Copperfield's read "He bites!" Eduardo's reads "He cheats!"
Is this in any way justified? Of course not. Arsenal coach Arsene Wenger --
even while admitting that he is uncertain whether or not the referee made the correct call -- has spoken out strongly against the victimization of Eduardo. This now includes an official UEFA
investigation of the incident, with the possibility that Eduardo will be slapped with a two-game ban.
As to the incident. I have seen three different replays, courtesy YouTube. I find all
three utterly inconclusive. Perhaps only one thing is clear -- the Celtic goalkeeper Artur Boruc never got anywhere near the ball. Was there contact between the two players? Possibly. Or possibly not.
It is decidedly odd that this incident -- which had no bearing on the result of the game, Celtic was outclassed by Arsenal anyway -- has caused such a stir. Wenger's point -- a strong one
-- is that there is no reason for UEFA to investigate. If they probe this referee call, then there are dozens of others, more controversial, that they should also look into every week.
Wenger is supported by the referee -- the Spaniard Manuel Gonzalez -- who is not backing down, and is standing by his call of a penalty kick, a call, he stresses, that was confirmed by his linesman.
Things get odder still. The Celtic coach, Tony Mowbray, did not make a big deal of the incident after the game. But then Mowbray is English, and it seems to be Scottish blood that is
boiling over this incident. OK, a Scottish team is involved, but it is from higher up -- from Gordon Smith, the chief executive at the Scottish FA that the loudest -- and the silliest -- protests have
Smith, it seems, is a longtime campaigner for Fair Play. His efforts, he tells us, have not been appreciated: "Since I came into this post, I have raised the issue of simulation
time and time again -- both here in Scotland and with FIFA and UEFA. I don't think that I have received enough support in my efforts to eradicate what I believe to be one of the most serious threats
to the integrity of football."
Right. So much more serious than the vicious elbows and the thuggish tackles that adorn every game, to say nothing of the now-routine midfield play-breaking
fouls. Gordon Smith's priorities are quite staggering.
But the Scottish connection continues. Wenger has noted that the case then passed to UEFA, where the CEO is a Scot, David Taylor.
Promptly UEFA decided to investigate -- even though the referee had himself made no complaint.
Wenger has used the word "witch hunt" to describe the singling out of Eduardo, and he is
right. I used the word myself, some months back, when talking about the overall and over-heated campaign against divers in general.
Smith's self-righteous rant against divers didn't look
quite so good yesterday when Aiden McGeady -- a Celtic player, no less -- was red-carded for diving. I've seen no comment from Smith on this one, but the response to this call was very different from
what assailed Eduardo. The Celtic players condemned the call as ridiculous, and the opposing coach, John Hughes of Hibernians, said "Even if he did take a dive, is it not just a case of saying 'let's
get on with it'? Where's the common sense?"
We shall know soon enough, and it does not look as though it will be coming from UEFA. Any more than, so far, it has come from the Scots.
There are a couple of extra items that are of interest. UEFA has had some experience in banning players for "trying to deceive the referee." It has done it once before, in 2007, when it used
video evidence to suspend Lithuanian Saulius Mikoliunas for two matches for diving to win a penalty in a European Championship qualifying match. A match against Scotland, as it happened.
There is also some possibly relevant background on Manuel Gonzalez, who refereed the Arsenal vs. Celtic game. Gonzalez was also the referee, in November 2007, of a crucial Euro 08 qualifier between
Italy and -- yes -- Scotland. Gonzalez awarded Italy a dubious free kick right at the end of the game -- it led to the winning goal for Italy. Which meant Scotland was out of Euro 08 -- its fifth
straight failure to qualify for a major tournament.
A Scottish Mafia? Hardly -- and anyway, it was the English press that wasted no time in delivering vitriolic attacks on Eduardo. For
those convinced that anything bad that happens in English soccer is caused by "foreigners," the Eduardo incident came at the right moment. It served as a hyped distraction from the previous day's news
-- the re-emergence of English soccer hooliganism at the West Ham vs. Millwall game. No news from Gordon Smith on whether that fracas -- it included one serious stabbing -- might be "a threat to the
integrity of football."