Why Wilmer Cabrera's U-17 tenure ended (Q&A)

Interview by Mike Woitalla

Wilmer Cabrera, who guided the USA to the second round at the 2009 and 2011 U-17 World Cups and headed the Bradenton Residency Program for more than four years, explains why he's left U.S. Soccer and looks back on his tenure.

SOCCER AMERICA: Why are you no longer the U-17 national team coach?

I rejected the offer from the Federation.

SA: Why?

Because the length of contract wasn’t long enough. Not even similar to what I had in my two cycles. It was half of the time that I was offered the last times.

SA: So just a year instead of two years?


SA: Do you know why they offered you a shorter term this time?

No. I don’t have any idea. I had been working very well with the Federation but I couldn’t accept that offer. It wasn’t good enough for me or my family.

SA: The non-renewal came shortly after the team did so well at the Nike Friendlies -- beating Brazil (3-1) and Turkey (2-1) and tying France (2-2) in December -- so it came as a bit of a surprise ...

I was thinking we were going in the right direction -- but the offer was different perhaps because they have different plans. I have to respect that. But I have to think about what’s good for me and my family, and for me as a coach.

SA: Do you know yet what your next move might be?

I’m in conversation with an MLS club to try and join the staff and we’ll see.

SA: How much contact did you have with Jurgen Klinsmann?

I just met him once, and it was a very nice conversation. It was the first time I met him and the only time  I spoke with him. [Last summer] I presented my technical report to the Federation and he was there -- and it was a very nice conversation. I imagine he’s very busy with his team because he has a lot of work.

SA: When you look back on your four and a half years as U-17 coach, what you think went well?

A lot of players jumped from the Bradenton Residency right away into professional clubs and they’ve been adapting very well.

If we provided the players with a good base for them finish at Bradenton and come to a professional club and adapt well, that means they were well prepared. Adapting not only to Major League Soccer, which is the most important thing our players should think about, but also to international clubs.

(EDITORS’ NOTE: Among the players who played for Cabrera at the U-17 World Cups were Juan Agudelo (New York Red Bulls), Luis Gil (Real Salt Lake), Perry Kitchen (D.C. United) and Jack McInerney (Philadelphia Union), in 2009, and, in 2011, Jack McBean (Los Angeles Galaxy) and Marc Pelosi, who signed with Liverpool in November.)

SA: What about the team’s performance under your watch?

The results in Central America were very positive. We played in two Concacaf Championships (U-17 World Cup qualifying) and we won all the games, and that’s important. In the eight games that were played, we won them all, and that proved the team at the Concacaf level was well prepared. We are progressing, but we’re not there yet.

I think with a better plan, where all national teams are communicating and working with the same idea we’ll get better results for the players and soccer in the United States, but I never received a plan. I never received feedback for what I was doing, right or wrong.

SA: What do you think the future of the Bradenton Residency is?

At some point, if the Development Academy and MLS clubs provide everyday training at a good level and good mentality -- I would say it won’t be necessary to have Bradenton. But right now that’s not happening, for different reasons.

We have to compete with the top players from the rest of the world, and they practice and compete everyday -- and if we’re not prepared to do that, we can go backward. So I think it’s very important we recognize when it's the right time to stop Bradenton, and that would be when they have the same opportunity in a good environment that’s not far from their parents.

SA: What are the main challenges of running a 40-player residency for kids from around the country? How difficult is it to provide a good environment for kids who leave home at a young age?

It’s very difficult because they’re coming from different backgrounds, different culture, different education -- and they need to have the kind of discipline where they have to be a role model.

Most of them are coming from places where they’re superstars. They’re big in their clubs -- and nobody says anything because they’re the best players. But when they come to Bradenton, no one is a superstar.

The work on the field is not as difficult as the work off the field -- school and responsibilities.  We weren’t only coaches. We were parents, psychologists, advisors.

It was quite challenging -- but very rewarding when we traveled around the world and the Americans we encountered told us how proud they were of the way the players were representing the USA. ...

I’ve been receiving e-mails from all the players saying thank you. Even from the ones we had to send home because of discipline -- they weren’t doing the right things -- they're sending me thank yous, saying, “I know I didn’t take advantage but I learned a lesson.”

I think we helped the kids a lot.

5 comments about "Why Wilmer Cabrera's U-17 tenure ended (Q&A)".
  1. Sean Cotter, January 14, 2012 at 12:32 p.m.

    Another great choice by the federation. I hope nobody really wonders why the USA cant compete on the international level.. Our federation rewards bad coaching and poor behavior . When someone shows great ability and poise they fire them. We as a country really need to examine the federations top brass and make some changes.

  2. beautiful game, January 14, 2012 at 3:11 p.m.

    Cabrera made the right decision and the soccer kahunas need to find a competent replacement. Luckily, it won't be Rongen. Strikingly, this level of development should be the primary dot on the radar for the national team coach and the tepid interaction with Cabrera speaks for itself.

  3. Chris Dailey, January 14, 2012 at 8 p.m.

    Sad news. Not sure our leadership has any vision or competency. We will see

    For me, in taking the Nat'l "C" coaching course, I found US Soccer coaches mostly arrogant and unapproachable. I don't believe we have the cache for such a disposition, yet we continue to push forward in this hard-to-comprehend direction.

    We need more humility and communication. Our Network is weak. It is almost as if US Soccer is afraid of getting help, or too arrogant to seek it.

    Best Wishes, Wilmer! Thanks for your contribution.

  4. Stephen Peck, January 14, 2012 at 9:03 p.m.

    Change is always interesting. I have always wondered why change, in administrative language, means getting rid of quality people. There seem to be very few administrators in this country who have the people management skills to lead existing staff in a new direction. Coach Cabrera has done an excellent and consistent job during his tenure with the U17s. He deserved a lot more respect than he was shown. I am aware of the fact that there is a new expectation that every level of the US Soccer Federation be coached to play the same way. Can anyone explain how that translates into getting rid of quality coaches? I hope that all of the new hires are watching this so that they are not summarily tossed aside unceremoniously. I wish the previous and present youth and Olympic national team coaches all the luck in the soccer universe going forward. Seems the out going group was judged to not be able to adapt their coach style and the incoming group is able to coach in the fashion of someone other than themselves. Slippery slope if you ask me. A very slippery slope. Good luck to all.

  5. Walt Pericciuoli, January 15, 2012 at 10:41 a.m.

    Sounds to me as if Wilmer let himself go. I don't have an explanation as to why our MNT coach would have had no contact with the US U17 coach yet. Seems to me this would be a vital partnership. With that said, perhaps that is why Wilmer was offered only a one year contract. It gives Klinsi a chance to met him and get to know and assess Wilmer's abilities without having been already committed to a two year term.I don't know Wilmer, but I liked the way his teams played.Not knowing their side of the story, it does seem US soccer may have made a mistake here by letting Wilmer walk out the door.

Next story loading loading..

Discover Our Publications