Sermanni ready to mix things up

[USA WOMEN'S HIRING] New U.S. women's national team coach Tom Sermanni says one of his goals to create greater competition within the national team. For what he said on Wednesday's media conference call ...

Tom Sermanni:
“I’m just delighted to be here. I’m really excited by the challenge ahead. I feel very privileged and honored to be given this position. It’s not often you get the chance to coach and manage the number one team in the world and a team that has been a world leader for many, many years. I’m looking forward to getting started as soon as possible.”

On the style he wants the U.S. team to play:
“We’ve tried to improve the way our Australian team has played over the last few years and anyone that has watched us has hopefully seen that. I want to make clear that the U.S. team is a very good side. There are some very good players in the team, which you have to have to win the tournaments that they’ve won. I’ve always tried to play a positive, attacking style of football. I’ve always had a philosophy of trying to get players to play to their maximum ability rather than limit them. I’ve always encouraged players to try and take responsibility and within that I’ve always enjoyed to try to teach and develop players to play a good football style of play. That’s keeping with what I would call positive possession. We want to entertain teams, we want to play well and we want to win games.”

On how he looks at his role with a team that has achieved such a high level of success for such a prolonged period of time:
“I think it’s probably a balance of those two things. I don’t think you just sit back and hope upon hope that the team is going to continue to be successful. The game is changing at a rapid pace and if you look at women’s football now compared to 20 years, the quality of the teams, the closeness of the teams, is much more pronounced than it was back in the 90s or the early 2000s. You have to continue to keep improving. You don’t come into a team like this and suddenly make radical changes. That would be an unwise thing to do. But what you do need to do is continue to do is try to improve players as individuals, try to improve the team as a whole and try to create even more competition within the squad. It’s a balance between those things. Certainly, I don’t intend to come in here and initiate enormous change because I don’t think that is necessarily. But as you go along in the job, you’re continually changing and continually trying to improve the team.”

On the potential of a professional league and how that would assist in identifying talent in the U.S.:
“I can certainly talk about the [Australian] W-League that has made an enormous impact on the Australian team. We set up the W-League for a variety of reasons and I think those reasons are probably important in any country. One is to have a domestic profile in any sport and for the players. The other is to give opportunities for players to be seen and to play against national team players and to see how good they are and if they have the potential to become a National Team player. A third reason is to develop players, particularly to develop younger players and get them into a professional environment. A fourth reason was to actually have a professional women’s competition for players, whether they were national team players or aspiring national team players or not, who want to play soccer at a serious level. We had all those reasons for trying to create the W-League and it has succeeded beyond my expectations and within five years managed almost to sort of redevelop the national team, being able to see players and give them that opportunity to play in a serious domestic competition for four or five months of the year.”

On whether those parallels could be brought to the U.S. in terms of a U.S. league or the U.S. team:
“I think every league differs slightly but I think some those same principles would exist. What’s important for any national team to have competition for spots on the team and I think a domestic league would create an environment where there is greater competition and greater opportunities for players to get into the National Teams. That’s where I would see some kind of synergy between the W-League in Australia and a professional league in America.”

On whether he thinks integrating youth players into the U.S. women's national team might be difficult considering the core group of players who have achieved much in the game:
“I need to do a little bit more research and planning before I can comment on the nuts and bolts of the program. What I will say is that, philosophically, we want to create greater competition within the national team and in order to do that, you have to create opportunities for other players. Whether that’s younger players or players that are in their 20s and haven’t had opportunities, I don’t know yet because I haven’t really been out in the marketplace to have a good look around. I think the key thing is to be able to bring players into a national team camp and give them opportunities and that’s what I want to try and do. The mechanics of that, I’m not quite sure about at the moment. I’m certainly not averse to throwing players into the mix and to try and develop players who are outside the established group at the moment.”

On whether he wants the U.S. to play a sophisticated, possession-style or whether he is okay with the more direct style that has worked reaped results in the past:
“That’s never been my style of coaching or the style that I like to play. I agree with Pia [Sundhage] and the direction that she wanted to go. I think that’s going to be the nexus of it, going forward. I think at the same time, you don’t want to take away some of the strengths. You want to improve some of the weaknesses but still keep some of those same strengths that the U.S. team has always had. Actually, it’s a huge strength that intimidates opponents, so you want to keep that, but you do want to keep developing your team to play a better brand of soccer, to play more … not possession for the sake of possession, but a positive style of possession, where the team is comfortable playing in tight areas, comfortable to back themselves in keeping the ball, comfortable to back themselves and be patient when they have to be patient. It’s a whole balance of those things, but still keeping the strengths that the team has at the moment. It’s just a case of continuing to persist with that and partly making the case into looking at the type of players that can actually do that as well. It’s trying to balance all those things and maintain a successful team at the same time. Going forward, I think it’s a reality in the modern day game that you no longer win games purely on pace and power and fitness. Those games have now become significantly narrower, so the actual soccer content and ability, and the technical content, is much more critical. The game is going to continue to go that way and we need to continue to strive as the U.S. team to improve in that area.”

On the priorities when he starts in January:
“Getting the lay of the land, I suppose. I think when I start in January the first priority for me will be to explain to players what my intent is – what I intend to do in a soccer sense, what I intend to do in a management sense, how I intend to run the team and what I want from the team. That will be my starting point. From there, you sort of have a plan in place but it tends to meander and it tends to fluctuate as you go along. Things I think will alter as we go along. The basic premise that I want to have is that I want to maintain and improve the team as the No. 1 team in the world. I want to increase competition within the squad and I want to play a brand of soccer that’s positive, that’s technically good and is based around winning games.”

On if he has been briefed on expectations, both in major tournaments and in playing style and development:
“I think the results in major tournaments are probably the number one priority when it all boils down to it. We had discussions about being more involved in the overall program here and things underneath the national team, as well as soccer in America. I’ve always believed that the national coach is in some way the spokesperson and perhaps the figurehead for the game itself, particularly in female sports. We had some discussions around a more holistic involvement in the game, as well as the priorities for the national team, which are obviously number one.”

On whether he has had in depth discussions with April Heinrichs and Jill Ellis:
“Before anything official happened, April was in Australia last week. We had some general soccer conversations over quite a significant period of time over the last week, so I’ve already had a few conversations with April. Obviously, at that stage I wasn’t the national coach, but as we do talk about soccer and various things we’ve already started that conversation in an informal way. I hope to be back here for the games in December and that will give me a great opportunity to catch up for a significant time with Jill and chat to her. I’m not sure, but perhaps at that time April might come along to the games and we can catch up then. I imagine these things will start as soon as possible and the conversations will be ongoing for some considerable time.”

On the most important aspects of youth player development and how the game will change in the upcoming years:
“I think technical development is the key. Technical development of youth players has to take priority over physical development. That doesn’t mean physical development gets completely ignored, but when I speak to younger players and coaches, that’s one of my key phrases. Coaches usually say to younger players they have to train harder. What I believe is younger players need to practice better, practice as well as they can and practice on improving how they play. By that, what I mean is how well they can dribble, how well they can pass, how well the touch is, how well their understanding of the game is. Rather than look at the training practices from a physical aspect, I think in youth development looking at your training practices from a technical aspect and improving how you can actually play the game is most critical and will continue to go that way. In the next generation of players, I think physical differences between teams will eventually be null and void and therefore the technical differences and the ability to play and understand the game will become much more critical focus.”

Having previous coached U.S. veterans Shannon Boxx and Christie Rampone in WUSA, how will he handle the older players as he looks toward 2015:
“I’d like to stress here is I don’t want to judge players on chronological age. I judge players on performance, on their ability to want to continue to play at the highest level and knowing the performance of players who are in competition with them. While I’ve certainly had a very good relationship with Christie and Shannon, and hopefully we will going forward, as a coach, part of this job is to be pragmatic and make decisions that you need to make in the best interests of the team. One of the key points I continually go back to in a team sense is every decision you try to make has to be in the best interests of the team. If you look at the team as it is at the moment, I would say Christie and Shannon are still probably two of the more dominant players on the team, and if they continue to do that and continue to be able to play international soccer at the level they can now, then that’s where the judgment will be made on them. I don’t want to look at it purely as an age factor.”

On his recent games against the USA and what he thought of how the team played:
“I think there’s misconception about the (U.S.) team. Teams get pigeonholed often and it’s a false perception of what they’re about. The U.S. team gets pigeonholed as a strong, physical team. This U.S. team is actually a good footballing team and they’ve got some very talented and gifted players in there. When I say footballing team, I mean possession-based, technically competent team. That foundation is already there. It’s not like you’re trying to start from scratch to make a 180-degree change. It’s really just getting onto the training field with the players and trying to sort of continue to develop the style of play. It’s not just get out there to make changes. It’s continually to add to the quality of the play and to try to get the best out of the players and the squad.”

1 comment about "Sermanni ready to mix things up".
  1. Futbol Genio, November 1, 2012 at 1:56 p.m.

    Not being an initial supporter of Coach Sermanni, as my thinking is that many American coaches were shortchanged in the head coach decisionmaking, I do like what he says above. Play for your spot; work on the "technique" aspects of every player; and, push this team to stop playing possession for its own sake, and to move the ball into areas where the opponent is stressed and makes mistakes. Japan does this with smallish players that are resolute in their skills and team efforts, and there is no reason why we can't do the same. Great fun to watch....

    The same fire in the gut that pushed Wambach from lagging behind some years ago is needed for other players, as she became quite a leader.

    Skill & determined movement towards the goal spooks other teams...Let's get it done!!

Next story loading loading..

Discover Our Publications