With Atletico, you get a few exciting
players in Frenchman Antoine Griezmann and the young Spaniard Saul, but you also get all that comes with its maniacal coach, Diego Simeone.
The problem is on the
other side of the field with Real Madrid, which hardly impressed in beating Manchester City, 1-0, and advancing to the final by the same score. Indeed, it is hard to remember a semifinal series that
was as poor as the Real Madrid-Manchester City series decided on an own goal.
With Manchester City's exit, the string of years without an English team in the Champions League final is
extended to four after six years out of seven with an EPL team in European soccer's showcase game. And the questions will persist, how can a team will unlimited access to money from the Abu Dhabi
United Group and City Football Group's minority owners in China be so underwhelming?
Real Madrid was hardly the Galaticos of lore, though. Zidane was being charitable when he said
Manchester City made his team suffer.
"I did not see a weak City," he said. "They were committed, and they defended well. The result shows it was tough for us. We won the game, 1-0, so we
suffered against a very good opponent. They did not have many chances, but that is down to the good tactical game we played, all defending."
Solid defending is not the takeaway you'd
expect from the richest club in the world, and Zidane will have to be smiling that Real Madrid faced Wolfsburg and Manchester City en route to the final, a far easier path taken than that of Atletico
Madrid against Barcelona and Bayern Munich. The Frenchman got a break because he was without Karim Benzema, his best striker, and holding midfielder Casemiro with injuries for the second
leg and Cristiano Ronaldo was not 100 percent after returning from a leg injury.
German Toni Kroos held down the fort in midfield -- it wasn't exactly a difficult chore
against a team that only managed five shots -- and Isco did well enough in his first Champions League start since the first leg of the Roma series in February.
Ronaldo was moved
into a more central role in place of Benzema but couldn't put his stamp on the game. He was nonetheless pleased to be back on the field after missing the first leg in Manchester and Real Madrid's two
previous La Liga matches.
"The press really doubted that I would stay healthy and really believed I would relapse," he said afterward. "But this didn't happen because I worked hard and
recovered properly."
Zidane praised his Portuguese star's contributions.
"Cristiano was focused on his work," he said. "He even helped at defense."
The problem is,
that's not what Real Madrid pays him for and why fans pay to see him.
If Ronaldo can't regain his form, it is hard to imagine anything but the inevitability of an Atletico victory.
Man City was listless, uninspiring, quite pathetic when an away goal makes the difference. Looked like the USMNT on a routine walk-about. As for the final, if RM is not at its best, Athletico will smell the roses.
MC's biggest problem was not having David Silva on the field... that was a major blow to them.
BTW...This article appears at the bottom of the page in the SA newsletter, and the announcement of some look-a-like character comes well above it... I guess it's more newsworthy to have an English look-a-like than to announce the CL finalist (not sure why though).
That's right, Silva is out and excuses mean nothing. Who stepped up to the plate; NOBODY!!!