Despite semifinal defeat, England revels in revival under Southgate

In the aftermath of a World Cup semifinal that it led but ultimately lost, a national team and its manager and fans need ponder what the 2018 World Cup means for England long-term.

Is it a platform from which Gareth Southgate and a player pool teeming with talent and youth can step among the world’s elite, or a precious opportunity that has flashed past in the blink of an eye, scattered to the winds, never to return?

No one can dispute the excellent job done by Southgate since moving up from managing the England U-21s and replacing the one-game wonder, Sam Allardyce, in September, 2016.

Two months earlier at the European Championship, England had been ousted by tiny Iceland, 2-1, in the round of 16 and the stirring saga of that small country continuing on to qualify for the 2018 World Cup did nothing to assuage the sting of another painful defeat in a major competition.

At the 2016 Euros, England had lumbered through the group phase by tying Russia (1-1) and Slovakia (0-0) and beating Wales, 2-1. The loss to Iceland swept out coach Roy Hodgson. Allardyce took over –- on his watch England beat Slovakia, 1-0, in its first World Cup qualifier – for a grand total of 67 days. The English FA fired him after viewing video of  his discussions with undercover reporters suggesting ways to circumvent transfer regulations.

Southgate did more than steer England unbeaten through the remainder of its qualifying campaign. He restored pride and commitment to an honor that somehow had mutated into a burden amid scorching media scrutiny and maniacal fan expectation. The World Cup champion of 1966 endured more than a half-century of failing to match that achievement and thus failing, period, in the minds of many.

If a semifinal appearance in 1990 wasn’t at least a measure of success, everything that fell short fell into the category of disaster. Once the World Cup 1994 qualification effort had fallen apart against the Netherlands in Rotterdam and The Sun ran a photo of a turnip superimposed onto the head of coach Graham Taylor, a succession of players and managers – no matter how successful – weren’t going to measure up unless they won the last game in a major competition.

Every two years for a either European Championship or a World Cup, popular conjecture swirled about how, not if, England would emerge as champion. A steady succession of disappointments didn’t stem a wave of unfounded hope.

Yet by the time Southgate took over, that pervading expectation had finally passed. For the World Cup, he excluded veterans such as goalkeeper Joe Hart and midfielder Jack Wilshire, and proclaimed a younger generation as the right choice for the present as well as the future. It took a while for fans and pundits to buy in, but not the players.

Defender Kyle Walker had been on the field in Nice when England fell to Iceland two years ago. Wayne Rooney scored the proverbial “dream start” goal in the fourth minute, but Iceland equalized two minutes later and in just 12 more minutes grabbed a lead it would hold. Walker was on the field Wednesday when England again scored early – on a Kieran Trippier free kick in the fifth minute – and endured another depressing reversal.

Yet though the result was the same, not so the mood. Decades of disgruntlement amongst the fan base had ebbed away, and the players felt rejuvenated.

“I was there in France, in the Iceland game, and it was completely different to that,” said Walker as he praised his teammates, the manager, and the fans. “For them to still be singing when we’re seeing friends and families, chanting our names and singing the manager’s name, is completely different. And I think we need to take full credit for that because we’ve changed that.

“We’re the guys who are running on the pitch, but he’s the backbone of this team. He’s made sure that everyone has stuck together through good and bad moments, and made sure our feet stayed on the floor. I can’t put into words how much credit he deserves for this.”

Southgate refunds the credit back onto the players. His switch to a three-man back line and encouragement of his defenders to play the ball out of the back when possible changed the team’s style only marginally. His mentoring instilled a different, stronger mindset. “People may have had a feeling that playing for England was always misery and regret and recrimination,” Southgate said to The Guardian. “Now, I think, they have seen it can be enjoyable.”

Once the tournament can be fully dissected and filed away, come the hard questions of going forward. The youth of many players -- Trent Alexander-Arnold (19), Marcus Rashford (20), Ruben Loftus-Cheek and Dele Alli (both 22), Raheem Sterling (23), Harry Kane, Jordan Pickford, and John Stones (all 24), Harry Maguire and Jesse Lingard (both 25) – is fuel for optimism. There is a discernible prospect of several years, perhaps even a decade, of challenging the elite of Europe and the world for first prize. Behind that generation are world championship teams at the U-17 and U-20 levels.

“We have one of two paths to go,” Southgate said. “This is either a moment of rare hope and we sink back. Or we build in the way that Germany did in 2010.”

There is also the stark fact England stumbled along a golden path to the final that had been cleared of its strongest possible challengers. It also squandered an early lead after failing to score a second goal when Kane hit the post with a follow-up of a saved shot. In four more years, Spain and Germany could regain their world-class caliber, France might be defending a World Cup title, etc.

The 2020 European Championship will be shared amongst a dozen cities in a new format, but it is Wembley Stadium in London that will host the semifinals and the final. Cue the expectations, not necessarily of titles upon titles, but rather a genuine anticipation that every two years England is rated among the top contenders.

In Southgate, England has a manager who shouldered blame for as a player – his missed penalty kick ended his nation’s hopes in a semifinal shootout loss to Germany at Wembley in the 1996 Euros --  and has stepped forward when the program was mired in disgrace.

“The team will be better in a couple of years,” Southgate continued. “We have to build. We have some good young players coming through. We’ve had success at youth level. What we’ve done over the last few weeks has shown what is possible. We want to be in semifinals and finals and we’ve shown to ourselves that can happen. Now we have to use it as a springboard to reach the latter stages of tournaments consistently.”

6 comments about "Despite semifinal defeat, England revels in revival under Southgate".
  1. R2 Dad, July 14, 2018 at 12:29 p.m.

    England over-acheived this cycle,  but the next four years will be much harder since there is a hole in the lineup for a true playmaker. England created plenty of chances in the final third against Belgium, but lacked a Hazard-type player who, for example, has the vision and huevos to meg John Stones on that through-ball to Lukaku.

    Maybe Phil Fodden can be that player, but I don't see him able to survive growing up (and developing) in the English Premier League. He's coming off injury now, and I just foresee years (just like Jack Wilshere) where he's not fully fit, gets injured, doesn't play, development suffers. What is it going to take before the few top English prospects decide, like Sancho, to go to a different league that will allow development? The English Premier League is just not a good environment for that--too physical, too much pressure to get a result every game, too much manager turnover.

  2. beautiful game, July 14, 2018 at 5:22 p.m.

    What's to revel about England. Even with Harry kane, most of the support cast provided little to the final product. No true play-maker was missing and the same methodical game was displayed.

  3. uffe gustafsson, July 14, 2018 at 7:19 p.m.

    As my family back in Sweden said the real final was France vs Belgium.
    but I think Croatia will have a say in that.

  4. Goal Goal, July 15, 2018 at 7:13 p.m.

    Croatia outplayed France and lost.  Stuff happens.  The officiating questionable.  VAR WHAT IS THE PURPOSE.

  5. beautiful game replied, July 17, 2018 at 8:25 a.m.

    Right Winger; well put. As for VAR, it was prematurelu rushed into a WC scenario without giving it a new car sales check before leaving the show room.

  6. R2 Dad replied, July 18, 2018 at 2:20 p.m.

    The purpose is to prevent the game-changing Henry hand ball (france v ireland), and events like it. It's not perfect, there are growing pains, but on the whole I think it performed adequately. There will always be "interpretation", which is to say human error, no matter how slow the instant replay. We expect perfection, but VAR in 2014 would not have resulted in a card for Neurer in any event (germany v argentina).

Next story loading loading..

Discover Our Publications