SOCCER AMERICA: What style of soccer do you think the USA should play?
ANDRES CANTOR: My answer is as broad and general as the question is because the style of play will be dictated by the kind of coach they bring -- and the players they have at hand for national team call-ups.
There are a few coaches, like Pep Guardiola and Marcelo Bielsa, you can identify with a style of play, and others who have copied Guardiola's possession-minded style of play. But Guardiola has great players to execute his style. He spends over 300, 400 million dollars a year to get the best players in every transfer market.
SA: But there are teams that play attractive and successful soccer not coached by Guardiola and Bielsa ...
ANDRES CANTOR: Tata Martino in Atlanta has a style of play, but he made sure the team did a great job acquiring the players he wanted for that style of play.
SA: What do think of the head coach hiring process?
ANDRES CANTOR: I don't know who the coach will be. I read that Earnie said English [fluency] is a must, but that it's not a must that he knows MLS inside out. So, I don't know what he's looking for. I don't know if he's looking for a Latin American coach. I've read -- I don't know if it's him promoting himself -- but I've read that David Moyes was in the running. Which is really surprising to me. I don't think they should hire an English coach.
I think there are pretty good choices here in the U.S. An American coach has an advantage over a big-name foreign coach because the American coach -- Gregg Berhalter, Peter Vermes, Dominic Kinnear, just to name a few -- knows the mindset of the American player, which is totally different than probably the mindset of any other.
If you bring a foreign coach, of course he can adapt, but he will have to learn by trial and error.
What I don’t understand, is what are they waiting for to make a hire? The sooner they hire someone the sooner they can get started on molding a future style of play.
SA: OK, let's forget about the coaches for now. How would you like the USA to play?
ANDRES CANTOR: I'd like to see a U.S. team hold the ball, have possession, be an attacking-minded team, taking risks. I think with the speed, athleticism, with a great athletic mindset of the players, and I'm sure they can find 23 players skillful enough to play that style, and the U.S. could be have an attractive style of play.
But a coach needs to adjust, of course, if you're playing Honduras in a Concacaf qualifier in San Pedro Sula heat at 3 p.m. …
SA: Is it important to you that the USA plays entertaining soccer?
ANDRES CANTOR: I have a sense of belonging to the U.S. national team, and I’d rather watch a U.S. national team that wins than one entertains me and doesn't win.
It’s the age-old argument: Would you trade a win for a team that tries to play entertaining soccer and loses? No. I wouldn't trade it. If you can get there playing entertaining soccer, then so much the better.
Every team should aim to play attractive soccer. That doesn’t mean they can do so against every opponent.
SA: You’ve been covering and watching the U.S. national team since the 1980s. What do you think of how it has played?
ANDRES CANTOR: The U.S. has proven themselves with whatever style has taken them there. Mostly defend and counter. They have proven they can compete with anybody in the world. What happened in this last World Cup qualifying was a disaster. It happens in soccer.
SA: Let’s go back to when the USA qualified for the World Cup for the first time in 40 years when they reached Italia 90 [under Coach Bob Gansler] …
ANDRES CANTOR: I was in Trinidad & Tobago when Paul Caligiuri scored the shot hear around the world. In 1989, when they qualified for Italy they were barely professionals. The team was made up of semi-pro players.
Then Bora Milutinovic came about and he really helped professionalize their game in the sense they played like a team -- Bora-style, knowing how to play, how to defend well, and how to counter and win games. He instilled in them the attitude that they could compete against anybody.
Was it fun to watch? I think so in terms of, instead of expecting them to get blown out, they beat Colombia and played Brazil toe-to-toe in Palo Alto. That was unheard of.
SA: Steve Sampson took over in 1995. The USA beat Mexico, 4-0, in the U.S. Cup and beat Argentina on the way to finishing fourth at the Copa America …
ANDRES CANTOR: Obviously, Steve had a great Copa America with a generation of players when the pool was thinner than it is now. There weren't that many players to choose from. And that generation turned out to be one of the best. Those from the early 1990s who carried over to 1994 and 1995.
SA: The U.S. reached quarterfinals of the 2002 World Cup …
ANDRES CANTOR: Yes, Bruce Arena's team had a great run in 2002. I called all their games. They played great against Portugal. They played great against Mexico. They almost beat Germany. I don't know if that was style or if that was character, but they definitely really played good soccer. They had good players.
I think Bruce Arena was very effective. He knew how to prepare for games and win games.
And, of course, Landon Donovan came about. And Clint Dempsey came about. As long as any team has good players, that will dictate how to approach the games and how to play.
Landon was the player Bruce was smart enough to make the other players play around him and for him. He knew how to exploit Landon's talent very well.
Now who's the Landon of this generation? Obviously, Christian Pulisic. But Pulisic needs to have good team around him. So how the new coach is going to surround Pulisic will be crucial.
SA: What did you think of the Jurgen Klinsmann era, which included reaching the second round of the 2014 World Cup? Did you find that team satisfying?
ANDRES CANTOR: The USA won only one game at the 2014 World Cup, with an 86th-minute John Brooks goal against Ghana, which didn't make it to the next round. They tied Portugal, which wasn't a great team then.
They lost to Belgium 2-1 – not 7-0, because Tim Howard was heroic and made 16 saves. Was it entertaining to watch the USA against Belgium, or when they lost to Germany [1-0], or when they beat Ghana? Not to me.
They came home and it was called a success because Tim Howard made all those saves. It wasn’t a success to me.
SA: Klinsmann certainly didn’t put us on a path toward a more Latin style of play …
ANDRES CANTOR: We had a German coach who looked for German-American players under the rocks instead of looking inside our own country. He looked to Germany instead of looking inward.
SA: When you look at some of the greatest U.S. national team players ever, you’ve got Hugo Perez, Tab Ramos, Claudio Reyna, Landon Donovan, Clint Dempsey ... Donovan’s early soccer experiences were with a team of Mexican-Americans and Dempsey as a teen played in adult Latin leagues in Texas. Doesn’t that make a case that the USA should embrace a Latin style of play?
ANDRES CANTOR: I can’t remember if Eric Wynalda had a Latin-American influence but he played with some of that style. But I don't think it's about embracing a player by ethnicity, but whether they’re skillful, good players.
SA: That’s my point. It’s not about ethnicity, it’s about a style of play, an emphasis on skill and creativity, which also leads to success. Many MLS champions over recent years, for example, have had a Latin American playmaker.
ANDRES CANTOR: That's true and it took a while. In the beginning, besides some of the marquee players, for some reason it was seen as risk to bring in those type of players and "hispanizing" the league. They slowly figured out it’s not bad.
SA: You’re originally from Argentina, a Boca Juniors and Argentine national team fan. Wouldn’t Argentina be a good model for the USA, in that it plays with Latin and European qualities?
ANDRES CANTOR: Latin because they’re Latin and European because so many of their players play in Europe?
SA: Well, I meant that it’s a skill-based game, but also athletic, aggressive, attack-minded …
ANDRES CANTOR: Argentina was one of the lowest scoring teams in World Cup qualifying, after Bolivia. Argentina has been a frustrating team to watch lately.
SA: But historically, and still, Argentina keeps producing world-class players, including strikers and playmakers who are sought by the European clubs. It has a history of playmakers, often small players who maybe in a U.S. soccer environment wouldn’t be appreciated because of the emphasis on athleticism. Do you think if there was a 10-year-old Lionel Messi somewhere in the USA he would rise to the top?
ANDRES CANTOR: I do believe that players still fall through the cracks in the USA, whether they’re Hispanic players or otherwise.
Argentina is very well structured. If there’s a player in the provinces, 11, 12 or 13 years old – somebody will see him and recommend him to a farm team of a professional team, whether it’s in the eighth or seventh division.
The minor leagues are very competitive and there’s a system of professional scouting that prevents players from falling through the cracks.
If you’re that skillful at 12 years, even if you’re 2,000 kilometers outside of Buenos Aires, somebody’s going to see you and the Argentine coaches have a good eye for talent.
SA: So, in a country like the USA, where we’re always looking to other countries as a model for our coaching and approach to the game, should we look more to soccer nations such as Argentina?
ANDRES CANTOR: In general terms, I’d rather have the U.S. see themselves in the mirror of the Latin America game than in the English. That’s for sure.
• Ian Barker on a U.S. style of play, producing No. 10s, and coaching schools in the USA
• Hugo Perez on style of play: 'The USA has the players to play possession-oriented, offensive soccer'
• Landon Donovan on a U.S. style of play, what worked in the past, and who should coach the USA
• Nico Romeijn and Ryan Mooney on U.S. Soccer coaching education: the Federation's intentions and its capabilities and capacity
Excellent interview, Mike. Cantor was obviously speaking his own mind.
Interesting and refreshing views. In Cantor's view selecting good players generally drives style of play, not selecting a coach. I agree. He also thinks we have skillful players and good coaches to select from without looking "under the rocks" for them. Perhaps we all have been making playing the game to be more complicated than it is. Think back to how you saw the game as a player.
Boring. Would have been more interested on his comments on differences in youth systems between US and Mexico or Argentina.
Couldn't we have interviewed people who have at least played the game...'bout some of players that played for the USMNT in the 90's and get their perspective, KLINSMAN, but Andres? an announcer, sorry.
Scary to think that even David Moyes is maybe being considered for USMNT....geez....
Did anyone catch the women's game Portland- North Carolina...this is professional ?, good grief, only in America a country is there a high tolerance for bad soccer. It was soccer rated between mediocre to terrible. You can only get away in displaying this product to fans who obviousy are not educated to the game....
Hay Dios mio, Senor Frank S!!!! Hey has US Soccer or Earnie S contact you yet for an interview? After all, you bring in some fairly good Dutch influential style of play, HOWEVER, I do agree with your comment re Moyes,for crying out loud and inna bucket, an English coach? PLEASE give us a break! Then again, that would be an indirect free kick in the mouth to Klinsman, the guy from the way other eastern side of the English Channel.... And I agree with Cantor that we do, now, yes AHORA/NOW have the requisite and talented US Coaches, named above, so we will not have to go accross the pond or reach into the Pampas of Argentina or the mountains of Colombia, nor the matto grosso of Brasil to contract a coach. Good interview on Cantor, and methinks that maybe he, Cantor, ought to be considered on a position within US Soccer, after all didn't we have Kissinger and another politician serving on the US Soccer Board of Directors? So why not an announcer who actually knows the game and is pretty good in the bilingual side?
Ric, I wouldn't mind Andres Cantor as president of USSF rather than Cordeiro, anyday..how 'bout them apples.! At least he has name recognition , very likeable, is involved in soccer as compared to Cordeiro who wouldn't know what the grass smells like. Kissinger was needed in those days because the league needed name recognition to even be respectable ,which is more than Cordeiro could ever do.
If Stewart decides on an English coach than he needs to be fired! I'm not a fan of English or German soccer or coaches for I think the influence and reliance on German and English soccer has been detrimental to the development of our American players.But I would like to see an SA KLINSMAN interview ,for he did bring an aspect of realism to soccer here, and would like to hear him out, WE DESERVE THAT, at least!!
As far as picking a USMNT coach, HUGO, TAB, or maybe Peter Vermes. But that is about as far as I would go in commiting myself in picking an American coach. I would like Tata being considered.
Ric, you make too much darn sense for the internet. :)
Andres is just telling it like it is - he's a guy that understand the USA and those countries. If you've ever been to latin america and seen the youth systems and understand how they work - you know - it is very much like Germany and England - our professionals here should 'know' these things - but we have to build our own - this is where we falter. Take Uruguay for example. Almost all of youth soccer from 0-14 (u13) is under written by two monopolies - the phone company and the oil company. They are state companies. There is no girl soccer - excepting a very nacent form - it's all boys. They've been doing it this way, refining along the way for a century. They have a very clear pyramid and its foundation is in community soccer with promotion and relegation. This pyramid makes it easy for their talent ID folks - that's why Andres says - few fall through the cracks. They do not have closed leagues there - no silos - no ECNL no DA, no USC vs. USYS or Super Y - every kid plays in their region with pro-rel. If you go to division a in Malvin Montevideo you are watching the best kids play - period. This is not rocket science. Baby soccer ends at U13 - period. They then move the big fields and academies. If you don't make an academy at U14 - you play for your school - or you play rec. I mean how long does it take to figure this out. There are not HS rules, there are no NCAA NIAA rules. There is no count down clock, or wave subs. Everything is played by FIFA standards. So you see it is much much more simple and much much more mature. We have a very complex setup here in a very large uniquely structured country with may very sticky organizations and institutions with their fingers in the pot. What MLS and USL are doing with their academies now is very very important. We need academies - we need them for D1, D2, D3 and D4 teams. Here in texas four years ago there was no pro team and no college program in the area surrounding McAllen, TX, known as Rio Grande Valley. Today you have a D1 college program, the RGV USL team which has an academy. Before USL was promoted to D2 about 2-years ago - basically after HS - if you did not go to college - soccer was a dead end street. Ten years ago the HS graduation rate for hispanic males was less than 50%, today it's somewhere in the 70s. These are all baby steps - unique to the USA - that looking at England and Germany and even Argentina and Uruguay - will help - but you will not find a template to solve these issues. But things are looking up for sure - more and more folks are contributing to the growth of the sport here - long ways to go - keep it going ya'll!
Humble. Maybe they should have interviewed you rather than Andres. At least there would have more interesting info...
Little off topic but attendance of women's soccer not far off from USL. There are just to many soccer entertainment options available with EPL/ Bundesliga all weekend and CL during the week. Unfortunatly women's and USL can only hope for family outing crowd.