Commentary

The requirements of modern soccer officiating (1)

Before I sat down to write this article, I watched Uruguay vs. Ecuador in the U-20 World Cup. The game was refereed by Michael Oliver -- an English referee. The officiating was world class and I could even consider it as one of the few masterpieces in any year one sees in top-level soccer officiating. It was refereeing at its best.

One might ask why and how Oliver refereed such a good game. It was a difficult game between two Conmebol teams and there were three Key Match Incidents (two penalty kicks and a red card) which he decided promptly and without hesitation even though he had the luxury of using the VAR system. All three decisions faced nearly no dissent form the players. Throughout the game, he had great respect from both teams. During the two penalty kicks, he managed both kicks proactively – warning both team players and goalkeepers -- and with great precision. Especially when the game became 3-1 for Ecuador, tensions started to rise up and players -- especially the Uruguay players -- showed signs of stress. He managed every foul that might potentially be problematic with the same proactive game management style using the correct body language and gestures. His proximity to the positions helped him to diffuse the potentially volatile situations. His overall performance clearly shows he understands both the letter and the spirit of the Laws of the Game (LOTG) as well as “What football expects”.

Oliver is one of the best referees from UEFA and he will definitely be invited to the World Cup in 2022 if he maintains his excellent performance level.

What can we learn from Olivers, Kuipers, Cakirs, and Skominas of UEFA for our soccer refereeing landscape? 

Unfortunately, our referees who envy to become a Michael Oliver start with a serious handicap. They are in Concacaf, and not in UEFA, and MLS is not at the same level as EPL.  Referees who want to climb up the ladder to become first-class referees have to test their skills in very competitive matches. Neither the MLS nor the Concacaf Champions League will bring the competition that UEFA top level leagues or UEFA Champions League/Europa League bring. Since we cannot move the USA into UEFA, we have to be aware of this handicap and find ways of producing more Geigers, Marrufos and Elfaths.

Here is some advice to some young and talented referees who envy to become a Michael Oliver from someone who spent 42 years at all levels of soccer refereeing from serving U.S. Soccer as a Grade 5 referee to being a member of the Panel of FIFA Referee Instructors/UEFA Referee Convention and Head of Refereeing for the Turkish FA. The percentage of readers of Soccer America who are or were high level soccer officials might be rather low but I hope that the other readers of Soccer America will realize after reading this article how difficult it is to become a Michael Oliver; the physical, mental, cognitive, intellectual and economic dimensions of it and the sacrifices it will require to become one.

  1. Knowledge of  the letter of the LOTG

A Grade 7 referee should know the letter of the LOTG well. I had been dealing with refereeing since 1978 and I read the LOTG from time to time and occasionally still come out with some aspects of the letter of the LOTG that I did not notice. So the remedy for knowing the letter of the LOTG well is to read the LOTG carefully and repetitively. Unfortunately, while coaching and assessing Grade 7 and even Grade 6 referees I notice that they sometimes show or tell me that their mastery of the letter of the LOTG is not adequate. There is no excuse for not knowing the letter of the LOTG if you are serious about going up the ladder. Not knowing the letter of the LOTG well might end up in a situation where you misapply the LOTG and the consequences of that might be very severe.

  1. Knowledge of the game mechanics

Any Grade 7 referee who wants to be promoted to the State level should have a good knowledge of the Game Mechanics as a referee as well as an assistant referee and should apply this knowledge on the field. Game Mechanics includes but not limited to the Diagonal System of Control, the effective use of the whistle and signals, the correct flag using techniques, correct positioning during set plays and the flow of the game. One can read the sections regarding the Game Mechanics in the LOTG (Practical Guidelines for Match Officials) as well as watching high-level games with a special emphasis on the Game Mechanics used. Listening to the advice and feedback of referee coaches on game mechanics will also be very useful.

  1. Knowledge and understanding of the spirit of the LOTG

Once you reach the Grade 6 level, you should start thinking about the spirit of the LOTG. Although learning the letter of the LOTG is rather is easy understanding the spirit of the LOTG is not. The LOTG says: “Football must have Laws which keep the game ‘fair’ as a crucial foundation of the beauty of the ‘beautiful game’ is its fairness – this is a vital feature of the ‘spirit’ of the game.” In order to understand the spirit of the LOTG, one has to answer the question “why” for each and every sentence in the LOTG through the lens of fairness and safety. This is not an easy task. One has to also go through different resources to understand the History of the LOTG – how various Laws have evolved over time – to have a better understanding of the spirit of the LOTG. For example, if a goalkeeper at the 80th minute of a league game whose team is losing the game 3-0 keeps the ball in his/her hand for 10 seconds and the referee awards an indirect free kick for this offense, it is clear that the referee knows the letter of the LOTG but unfortunately does not understand the ‘spirit’ behind the ‘letter’. The ‘letter’ was written so that goalkeepers do not get involved with time-wasting tactics by holding the ball in their hands for unreasonable amount of time. The goalkeeper whose team is losing a league game by a score of 3-0 in the dying minutes of the game cannot be getting involved in time-wasting tactics.

The modern-day refereeing asks the advanced referees not to be "a referee by the book" but rather a referee who "manages" the game and the players. In order to manage the game and the players, one has to know the spirit of the LOTG game well. 

  1. Understanding 'What football expects'

The phrase “What football expects” came into our lives maybe a decade ago. A Grade 5 Referee is ready to perform in professional games. At this stage, you would expect the referee to understand “What football expects” while refereeing the games. Unfortunately it is not as easy to understand “What football expects” as understanding the letter and the spirit of the LOTG. It is a serious cognitive and intellectual process one has to go through. First of all playing and coaching the game at a competitive level helps a lot. Doing so you understand the concept of what football is expecting since by being a player and/or a coach you were recipient of the decisions of the officials. A careful observer can see how “What football expects” has influenced the evolution of the LOTG in the past few years.

Just to give one example, until this year the LOTG talked about “deliberate handling”. Now the LOTG (2019-2020) talks about “a handball offense”. Even the change of the letter of the LOTG from “deliberate handling” to “a handball offense” reflects the philosophy what “What football expects.” Although previously the offense was called “deliberately handling,” all the players, coaches and spectators referred to it as “handball”.

Another example: The new LOTG says “It is an offense if a player ….

• gains possession/control of the ball after it has touched their hand/arm

and then:

• scores in the opponents’ goal

• creates a goal-scoring opportunity

• scores in the opponents’ goal directly from their hand/arm, even if accidental, including by the goalkeeper.”

The key word here is “accidental.” “Accidental” is just the opposite of “deliberate.” Even though in the past, the letter of the LOTG talked about “deliberate handling” football did not want a goal scored through a contact with the hand/arm whether it be deliberate or accidental. Football here means players, coaches and spectators who did not find it “fair” for a goal to be scored with the accidental or deliberate use of the hand. So now the letter of the LOTG is in harmony with “What football expects.”

Another manifestation of “What football expects” in the LOTG is the removal of what is called the “triple punishment”: The red card, the penalty kick and mandatory one-game suspension. Football did not find this to be fair so the LOTG changed.

For the purists and the “referees by the book” the concept of “What football expects” to overtake the letter of the LOTG will not be easy to swallow. Let us not forget the referees are the servants of the game and not the other way around. The current letter of the LOTG reflects the realities of modern officiating. The referees have to follow “What football expects."

U.S. Soccer grade 5 referees and above have to live through this change. Not every detail of “What football expects” will be evident and accessible to the referees. They have to go through a painful cognitive and intellectual but a rewarding process of understanding “What football expects."

We will continue of commenting and advising on the requirements of the modern soccer officiating in our next article.

Until then…

Ahmet Guvener (ahmet@ahmetguvener.com) is the former Secretary General and the Technical Director of Turkish FA. He was also the Head of Refereeing for the Turkish FA. He served as Panel member for the FIFA Panel of Referee Instructors and UEFA Referee Convention. He now lives and works as a soccer consultant in Austin, TX.

6 comments about "The requirements of modern soccer officiating (1)".
  1. Ginger Peeler, June 8, 2019 at 1:18 p.m.

    Don’t forget Esse Baharmast!

  2. Kent James, June 8, 2019 at 3:45 p.m.

    While I appreciate the column, I have a problem with the new "handball" ruling (and it it's currently being used, the US got away with one (and maybe 2) handballs v. France in the U20.  Essentially, "what the game expects' has overrulled "the spirit of the game".  Under the spirit of the game, a player is not allowed to use his hands because that's too easy; it would be a different, less interesting (I think) game.  But a player should not be penalized (especially when the penalty is a pk) for having arms.  So if a player is doing normal things, and the ball hits the player's arm, ti's like it hit the player's knee (or any other part of the body), and play continues.  Of course, the problem was that many people (who didn't know the rules) thought that anytime the ball touched someones hand (or arm), it was a 'handball" and a penalty.  While even knowledgeable players (and referees) had trouble with some areas (are hands away from the body, held out for balance, e.g., a "natural" position and not subject to penatly if the ball hits them?), I think FIFA could have cleared that up (I would have preferred them saying specifically that "hand and arms extended for balance are considered to be in a natural position").  


    I understand that the change is an attempt to conform with what players and fans think, and thus reduce dissent, I am disappointed that FIFA took this route.  What's next, calling handball whenever it strikes the arm, as may fans think?  And on a more serious note, what if the ball hits the referee and the bounce favors one team, shouldn't that be a penatly as well?  

  3. R2 Dad replied, June 8, 2019 at 11 p.m.

    I’m not sure the new handling interpretation is down to the influence of fans who don’t know the LOTG. I think VAR has inadvertently caused confusion by having officials look at infractions in super slo-mo, making things worse/more complicated than better. I think, eventually, an event that can’t be determined in real time won’t be able to be overturned after slo-mo viewing. The CL PK in the first 30 seconds should be a warning against reliance on this, which in my view WAS a player penalized for having arms.

  4. Craig Cummings, June 8, 2019 at 10:42 p.m.

    Yes kent as I do not agree with Lalas 2 years ago that any time a ball hits an arm it will bs a direct free  kick, BUT it looks like FIFA is going that way. Lets ask  our expert from NY  what he thinks. Randy is always spot  on.

  5. Randy Vogt replied, June 10, 2019 at 1:21 p.m.

    Craig, I'm definitely not always spot-on which you would figure out if you come to my games but while some of the rules changes are good, what I don't like is what was black-and-white is sometimes becoming gray and the defense is being favored. An example of the former is DOGSO committed by the defense inside the penalty area used to always be a sending-off offense, now it depends. An example of the latter is accidental handling will be penalized if it results in a goal, while the same contact by the defender is not a foul. Consequently, with all these additions, the rule book is becoming longer and if I wrote Preventive Officiating today, it would probably be 8 pages longer. So hopefully, I answered your question. I would like to applaud Ahmet's excellent article above, including his appreciation for Michael Oliver. I have a very good memory so I remember that Ahmet did not believe the PK decision by Oliver for Real Madrid against Juventus was correct as it was not "what football expects." To me, it was correct as it was a foul.

  6. John Gordon, June 9, 2019 at 4:12 p.m.

    Ahmet, a good high level referee should have had some playing experience or coaching experience.  That experience helps mold his views of what the LOTG are trying to accomplish.  How often has a player or a coach felt that the use of a particular law was not fairly applied.

    That is why the changes have been made recently in specific circumstances.  You point some out very well.

    I was watching Portugal and the Netherlands game.  Ever so often a player slightly behind the dribbler would reach up with his hand and gentle tug at the shoulder to catch up.  When you and I were refereeing together, that was a foul.  Now at the highest level, it must be what the game wants.  It sure cuts down on the offensive opportunities.

    I still like to see referees who don't hestitate to award fouls for defenses slyly reducing the beauty and offense of the game.


Next story loading loading..

Discover Our Publications