FIFA president Gianni Infantino's women's soccer proposals -- what do they actually mean?

Two days before the end of the 2019 Women's World Cup, which has set television viewing records around the world, FIFA president Gianni Infantino made five proposals he wants to present to the FIFA Council to further grow the women's game.

"It's a great thing, this World Cup, but then people forget, they do other things," he said at a media conference in Lyon on Friday. "It's our job to make sure that they don't forget and we don't just say: 'See you in four years.' That's why I propose to the FIFA Council and to all our members -- who have to embrace the development of women's football."

1. Create a FIFA Club World Cup for women.

ASAP, said Infantino. Increased investment by clubs in women's soccer is the single most important thing that can happen to develop the sport.

Organizing a Club World Cup for men has been difficult enough, though. A lot of questions exist on the women's side. How many teams would take part? How would they be selected? When would the tournament be held? Who would host the tournament? How would it draw?

Right now, only UEFA and Conmebol organize confederation championships for clubs. (The UEFA Women's Champions League is the single best club competition for women, drawing the top clubs from around Europe and increasing commercial interest.)

To get it rolling, FIFA will probably want to make the first tournament an invitational competition. The United States is the only country where women's soccer consistently draws at the club level, so one or more of the top-drawing NWSL teams -- Portland, Utah, North Carolina -- would make perfect hosts. Another possibility: co-hosting with Mexico, where Tigres (based in Monterrey) is the best-drawing club in the Liga MX Femenil.

2. Create a Women’s World League.

A proposal was made in 2017 for a FIFA world league to be played in tournaments all over the world. It got pushback from UEFA, whose calendar is already full as the only confederation with a four-year cycle of events for women's national teams (qualifying and finals for the World Cup and European Championship).

Outside UEFA -- where 48 of its 55 have women's national teams -- only a handful of federations operate national teams on a full-time basis -- basically, the USA, Canada and Mexico and the national teams U.S. Soccer invites to its two invitational tournaments -- so additional national team programming is essential, in particular in South America and Africa.

Without a full-time program, there's no incentive to have a full-time coaching staff whose work between events can be just as important in terms of developing and promoting the women's game as when teams are in camps or at matches.

3. Expand the Women’s World Cup from 24 to 32 teams.

Infantino would like to do it as soon as with the 2023 edition though that will require countries bidding to host the 2023 tournament to modify their proposals, taking into account eight more teams.

(The nine prospective bidders -- Argentina, Australia, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Japan, New Zealand, South Africa and South Korea -- have until Oct. 4 to submit their formal bids.)

Expanding the World Cup would be a balancing act: the value of promoting the sport in eight more nations surpassing the potential cost of diluting of the tournament.

An additional eight teams in 2019 would have added: Panama, Colombia, Philippines, Mali, Switzerland, Belgium, Denmark, Iceland. The difference in quality between these eight teams and those that qualified would not be that great. (The problem for women's soccer is that the quality drops off very quickly after the top 40 or so teams.)

4. Double the prize money for the next Women’s World Cup.

Infantino referred to "prize money" of $15 million in 2015 and $50 million in 2019. The prize money was indeed $15 million in 2015 doubled to $30 million in 2019.

The additional $20 million that FIFA will pay out in 2019 will go to reimburse teams for their World Cup preparations -- $11.5 million -- and pay clubs for releasing players -- $8.5 million. (FIFA gave men's teams $48 million for preparation costs and pay out $209 million to clubs in 2018.)

An additional $30 million spent in 2023 -- shared presumably among eight more teams -- would still be less than the additional $40 million the prize money FIFA will pay out in 2022 ($440 million) as compared to 2018 ($400 million).

5. Double the investment committed to women’s soccer over the next four-year cycle.

That's an increase from $500 million to $1 billion. “We don’t need all this money in the Swiss banks,” Infantino said. “The Swiss banks have enough money.” FIFA’s cash reserves at the end of 2018 were $2.74 billion. (They are so high in part because the organization self-insures.)

It should be understood that this increased investment would include what what Infantino is already proposing elsewhere. FIFA's figures for investment in women's soccer include the costs of organizing the Women's World Cup and other FIFA women's competitions, prize moneys and payments made for the Women's World Cup and money paid out to confederations and federations as part of their day-to-day operational and development efforts.

FIFA's Forward Development Program pays out up to $6 million to each federation over four years -- up to $1 million a year for on-going programs and up to $2 million for development programs. Programs covered include women's leagues (minimum of 10 teams playing a six-month season) and girls national teams (minimum of four matches).

11 comments about "FIFA president Gianni Infantino's women's soccer proposals -- what do they actually mean?".
  1. beautiful game, July 6, 2019 at 10:43 a.m.

    Infantino should double the annual outlay for women's soccer global development since his claim that the org. has over $2B in cash.

  2. frank schoon, July 6, 2019 at 11:21 a.m.

    Increase from 24 to 32 teams???? It would have beenbetter  to reduce to 16 or 12....I find the quality of soccer goes down after about  the 10th team... This is too fast and too soon... First develop women soccer than go for the increase....

  3. John Soares replied, July 6, 2019 at 12:28 p.m.

    Frank, of course you are correct regarding the drop in quality.
    BUT, is there not a giant drop between the top 10 and the bottom 10 of the 48 mens teams.
    Also, if (a big if) there is a chance of making it to the WC. 
    Will countries invest more in the womens game, therefore raising that quality.
    Just hoping:)

  4. frank schoon replied, July 6, 2019 at 2:08 p.m.

    John, in a way you're right , I personally would rather see the WC for men go back to 24 teams. As a matter fact I much rather would watch the European Cup for nations then even the WC , just for that reason. But there is no way to compare the reduction of quality by adding some of the men's as compared to the women.
    It is not only raising money but also there are cultural hindrances which takes a long time, but, hey , whatever, who am I to say....

  5. R2 Dad, July 6, 2019 at 1:38 p.m.

    Good article, AG. The World League will always be crushed by UEFA, as a FIFA-lead effort to diminish/replace UEFA CL for men (the golden goose). Concacaf should lead with a women’s CL tourney, with good prize money, to stimulate year round women’s soccer. That’s what leadership looks like, Concacaf, in case there was any doubt.

  6. Bob Ashpole, July 6, 2019 at 4:26 p.m.

    Unless FIFA bankrolls the expenses, he will bankrupt clubs and national federations if they try to attend all those events.

  7. uffe gustafsson, July 6, 2019 at 5:38 p.m.

    Sorry frank but u sound like a soccer snob.
    increasing the women’s teams only will make women’s soccer greater. As the article stated some of the teams don’t even have full time national coaching staff.
    jamaica had volunteered coaching staff and they played some good games.
    So America countries just now starting to be able to qualify for this WC. 
    This can only make countries to start putting more focus on women’s team and build national leagues.
    loved every minute of this WC.

  8. Bob Ashpole replied, July 6, 2019 at 9:59 p.m.

    I would much rather see conference play. Less expense, less travel, more home games.

  9. nick p, July 6, 2019 at 6:13 p.m.

    love to see the best teams from NWSL take on the best teams from Europe in a women’s club world Cup 

  10. Bob Ashpole replied, July 7, 2019 at 1:37 a.m.

    The US spreads out its national team players in order to have closer to parity across the league. They don't do that in Europe.

  11. Mario Cesarone, July 7, 2019 at 5:30 p.m.

    Creating a World League would be the best thing for Women's soccer.  Right now there are few world class teams in Europe and possibly the USA.  Organize the top 20 in a Premier League set up,  then 2nd, 3rd, 4th tier and so on like they do in the Nations Leagues, with promo and relegation.  Over time the best will rise to the top through skills development.  Use some of that FIFA investment to pay for travel costs.

Next story loading loading..

Discover Our Publications