As metropolitan areas go, few reflect the soccer boom of the
last half century better than Seattle.
Pro soccer began with the arrival of the Sounders in 1974. They were the first NASL team to register a sellout when they draw a crowd of 13,498 fans
at Memorial Stadium for their game against the Philadelphia Atoms.
Forty-five years later, the Sounders drew a franchise-record 69,274 fans at CenturyLink Field, the largest ever for a
sports event at the stadium, to watch them beat Toronto FC, 3-1, to win MLS Cup 2019.
Youth soccer flourished across the state of Washington, producing such players as Michelle
Akers and Hope Solo, two of the great women's players of all time. The Sounders academy program is one of the most progressive in MLS, sending three U.S. players to the 2019 U-17 World
Cup.
Soccer is the most popular sports activity among Seattle boys (35 percent) and girls (25 percent), according to a University of Washington survey of 1,038 youth. With its proximity
to mountains and the water, Seattle ranked second in the
country, behind only Arlington, Virginia, as the fittest city in the United States in 2019.
That's the good news.
But the report of the Aspen Institute's
Project Play on Seattle and King County sports and recreation programming tells a story that is common across the country and common to all sports:
-- Organized sports are exclusive,
leaving many King County youth out of organized sports and activities because of cost.
-- Youth who aren't English speakers at home are almost three times more likely to have never participated
in organized sports or recreation than children who speak English at home.
-- Youth of color are significantly more disadvantaged than white youth in having a chance to take advantage of
organized sports opportunities.
Pay-to-play is a problem. Aspen Institute research suggests that the average King County family spends $825 per child for 12 months of participation in one
sport, almost 20 percent higher than the national average. And it has spilled over into high school sports. Players are pressured (or feel pressured) into playing club sports if they want to compete
in those sports at the high school level (even JV).
But pay-to-play is only part of the problem. The rise in the costs of school athletic fees in the last decade -- since the Great
Recession -- have driven down the participation rate in school sports. (A bill to cap the fees for school sports and other extracurricular activities stalled in the Washington state
legislature’s 2019 session.)
But an even more fundamental problem is lack of access:
-- There aren't enough parks and facilities to meet the demand to support youth
sports activities.
-- Many youths don't have convenient transportation options to get to parks or facilities.
-- Those youths who live near parks or facilities are often discouraged from
going there because parents view them as unsafe. (One parent said, "No parent in their right mind would allow their kid to go there, or maybe they would allow their kid to play at the park but not to
walk there.”)
-- Overcrowded parks and facilities have led to field-scheduling policies and procedures that are so burdensome they have become barriers to entry for new organizations or
for those who don't speak English.
-- Crowded fields leave little or no space for free or unscheduled play.
The Aspen Institute's recommendations for reforming youth sports and
making them more accessible include to think small and think local, focusing on establishing schools as hubs for sports and recreation. They already provide easy and safe access for all youths in
school. And they have families with a vested interest in using the facilities for the greater interest of the community.
With that in mind, here are SA's tips, drawing on the Aspen
Institute's recommendations, on what soccer leagues and organizations can do or facilitate:
1. Identify teachers who have a
background and interest in the sport and support them in getting involved in coaching and promoting soccer at all school levels.
2.
Integrate soccer into p.e. classes.
3. Make school playgrounds soccer-friendly for recess.
4. Organize soccer activities in after-school programs.
5. Launch interscholastic programs at
schools that don't have them.
6. Lobby to reduce or eliminate fees for interscholastic participation in soccer and other sports.
7. Develop comprehensive joint-use agreements for access to existing and new school fields and facilities.
8. Provide year-round support for the maintenance of fields and facilities.
1- Will need to pay teachers, to get involved
2- would be great
3- would be great, partner with US Soccer foundation for mini pitches at schools
4- Will need to pay someone to run after school programs
5- Will cost $$ to set up, and then need to pay coaches
6- Would be nice
7- Already in place in a lot of areas, but $$ wins out when wanting to use the fields
8- In many cases won't be free, will cost $$
The bottom line is that unless, the government starts to fund soccer/athletic programs the need to have a pay to play model will not go away in our lifetime. I wish we could do away with it, but we just can't line up enough volunteers to fill all of our needs in youth soccer.
Thanks for this article. #3 also would include getting principals and their school districts on-board, who dictate the rules for their teachers.
There is a trend away from "normal" recess in school and afterschool programs, which in the old days meant kids just ran around doing stuff, unsupervised. These days playground play is often supervised by people whose primary role is to ensure no one gets hurt and no one gets their feeling hurt (eg last one picked on a team). So team play is not allowed/encouraged, and when it is allowed they play 30 kids on a basketball court to avoid any real running or ball control.
Improving this situation will require people at the top caring about soccer, and sadly I have not seen any of that at all.
This can be said or this formula could be implemented for all sports
Seattle United is a youth soccer club is Seattle that covers many of the points made in this article. Perhaps a follow up with the club to see what the reality really is in Seattle. The club offers PE in schools, financial aid to players that qualify, and also monies for travel if needed. I sure the club would be willing to discuss