Basketball isn’t alone in having an untraditional discipline in the Games. The most entrenched is beach volleyball, which has evolved past the “Look! Women in bikinis!” stage to be one of the more interesting events each time around. Rugby doesn’t even have its original 15-player version and is instead represented by rugby sevens, which packs a lot of scoring into a short game. If cricket ever makes the Olympic program, it would surely be the condensed Twenty20 format and not the three-, four- or five-day formats that date back a couple of hundred years or so.
So what can soccer learn from this?
Soccer has a couple of widely played cousins. There’s beach soccer, which puts a premium on juggling and volleys (especially bicycle kicks) to keep the ball off an uneven surface:
Then there’s futsal, a much-lauded training tool whose entertainment merits are debatable:
One wild card would be what we used to call “indoor soccer” (NASL, MISL, NPSL, WISL) but is now called “arena soccer” (MASL) or “futbol rapido” (Mexico). The American Association of Soccer567 has put together games between U.S. teams and visitors from Mexico, Brazil, Colombia and Somalia.
The AAS567 leads us to yet another form of soccer under the auspices of the World Minifootball Association, an international body with interests in arena soccer and various small-sided games. One thing “minifootball” has in common with traditional soccer is that the U.S. women are World Cup champions.
(With all the tinkering we’ve seen in the USA, I’m surprised we never saw a soccer league try a 7-a-side game that can be played in a baseball outfield and would lend itself to the high scoring Americans allegedly want. I say “allegedly” because if scoring mattered so much, lacrosse would be more popular than soccer.)
But realistically, the choices would be beach and futsal, especially because they’re both sanctioned by FIFA, the IOC’s recognized governing body.
Establishing each discipline as its own entity with specialist players would help, but it’s not necessary. Pro 3x3 is in its infancy, though specialists are emerging. (The U.S. women won gold with WNBA players, while the men had no one from the NBA and didn’t qualify.) Cricket typically has the same players in all forms of the sport.
Beach volleyball, on the other hand, is a distinctly different sport. Indoor volleyball has setting specialists and defensive specialists, while beach players have to do it all. Beach volleyball organizations haven’t always been stable, but pro play has existed for decades. Rugby sevens also has branched off a bit as well, with little overlap in rosters between the frenetic sport and the traditional game, which is more of a grinding affair.
Soccer disciplines are somewhere in between. Some of the players on the U.S. roster for the upcoming Futsal World Cup are pro futsal specialists, while others play in the MASL. Beach soccer has some pro teams that are offshoots of large clubs, while the U.S. roster for the World Cup had three from MASL and a lot of unaffiliated players.
The case for futsal in the Olympics: To begin with, it doesn’t require sand. It can share a venue with handball. It would be the purists’ choice.
The case for beach soccer: It may cater to a younger audience. It’s better-suited for cool highlights.
Either would be a nice complement to traditional soccer in the Olympics.
Or a replacement.
As stated before, women’s soccer has outgrown the Olympics and would be better off focusing on the World Cup and continental tournaments as the men do. The men’s soccer tournament is such a strange hybrid, with an almost random selection of overage players added to an under-23 tournament.
Another advantage to switching soccer disciplines: Olympic hosts are struggling with the sheer scope of the Games. Outdoor soccer requires large stadiums, and many games are hosted far outside the host city. Futsal can be played anywhere; beach soccer can take place near beach volleyball and perhaps surfing.
Besides, the best Olympic sports peak at the Olympics. The biggest Olympic sports (track and field, swimming, gymnastics) have substantial world championships, but the Olympics are the pinnacle. That’s not going to happen in soccer (or tennis or golf, but that’s another rant), but it could happen for futsal or beach soccer, and the sports would surely grow in the Games.
Beau, you make some excellent points, but doesn't soccer (with it's large venues) make a lot of money for the Olympics? I would think that money would make it difficult to replace it (in spite of good rational arguments to do so). I think both the men and the women should adopt a pure U-23 format, to distinguish the Olympics from the other international tournaments. I like the idea of futsal, but I agree that while it is a lot of fun to play, it is somewhat less entertaining (though I'm not exactly sure why...). I played a 7 v 7 format indoors during the winter for many years which I think has a lot of advantages; no dasher boards, surface is turf (or grass outdoors), goals are slightly smaller (7' x 7 yds instead of 8' x 8 yds). It's nice because it relies on normal soccer skills, but there are a lot more opportunities on goal (field is probably 70 yds x 50yds). I think it would be like rugby 7s compared to standard rugby.
I was thinking similarly when I first saw 3 v 3 hoops. I was wondering how they snuck in this game without much fanfare.
I'd like to see futsal in the winter games and the beach version in the summer games.
After experiencing as well as being one of the first coaches to coach Futsal in the Youth Olympics in 2018 in Buenos Aries Argentina I totally believe that Futsal should be in the Main Olympics. I wish I could share the videos of the games. The games were fantastic and the fans were amazing. 8 too 10 thousand fans a game. The cheering sections were insane.
I wonder what Beau Dure meant by "Then there's futsal, a much-lauded training tool whose entertainment merits are debatable". That sounds very different from your very positive experience. All I can think of is he must not have had much real exposure to the game.