As it does every year, the UEFA Champions League quarterfinal draw served up some mouth-watering match-ups headlined by what will be the seventh and eighth Madrid derbies of the season between Realand Atletico, followed by La Liga favorite Barcelona against reigning-but-fading French champ Paris Saint-Germain. Oh, and Bayern Munich also faces FC Porto, while Juventus finds itself paired withplucky AS Monaco.  

Just in case you missed the round of 16 — and the subsequent complaining and analyses that followed —  no English teams will be represented in the UCLquarterfinals (Note: they have also vanished from the Europa League). Sorry, Premier League fans. Not this year. And despite the finger-pointing (Mourinho: it’s the players!) and excuse-making (Wenger: it’s the away goals rule!) that followed the exits of Chelsea and Arsenal inparticular, the simple fact of the matter is that each of England’s three round of 16 representatives was deservedly beaten.

Per usual, the English papers are now asking themselves very serious questions about the state of the Premier League vs. other European leagues. After all,this is the second time in three years that team England has completely bowed out of the UCL at the round of 16 stage. Surely, it’s a crisis! Or maybe it’s just cyclical? Perhaps analyzingthe hell out of it will help them do better next year? 

What a load of garbage. Chelsea and Arsenal lost their respective series to PSG and Monaco simply because the players lost themental battle against their opponents — and Jose Mourinho and Arsene Wenger should take responsibility for that instead of pointing the finger elsewhere. At least ManchesterCity’s Manuel Pellegrini was gracious enough to acknowledge that his men were beaten by a better team, and in particular, one Lionel Messi, who looks back to his world-beatingbest.

As mentioned earlier, Mourinho decided to blame his players for a lack of confidence and concentration. While it’s certainly true that failing to defend set pieces is almost alwaysdown to a lack of concentration, Chelsea, and Mourinho specifically, is guilty over two games of setting his team up to do the absolute minimum required to progress to the next round. The Portugueseoften does this with his tactics, and it often works for him, too, because, as we all know, part of the Mourinho ethos is to be comfortable defending.

In the second half against PSG, OperationBare Minimum seemed to be going just fine, until Zlatan Ibrahimovic was sent off in the first-half. Suddenly, the Blues, who expected to defend their way into the quarterfinals, had an extraman. They had no idea what to do. Going for the jugular was obviously not what the players had prepared for, so they were unable to attack PSG effectively. In the end, the ten-men bossed the matchwith effective counter-attacking, and all four goals came from set-pieces. Mourinho was effectively beaten at his own game.

Now, to be fair to Arsenal’s Wenger, he blamed histeam’s exit on poor defending during the first-leg 3-1 loss at home to Monaco (you don’t say!), but since, he has tried to deflect attention away from that poor, poorperformance—which he certainly shares much of the blame for—by suggesting that “the weight of the away goals rule is too big”, or it’s “outdated,” somethinghe has complained vociferously about for years.

Incidentally, English clubs have exited the UCL five times in the pastten years on away goals (the most of major European leagues), and Arsenal has twice been on the receiving end of those exits, so it’s no wonder that the likes of Wenger and former ManchesterUnited coach Alex Ferguson don’t like it.

Now, Off The Post believes that everyone is entitled to their opinion, but again, let it not be said that Arsenal actually played bettersoccer than Monaco over two games. The Gunners approached that first game in London as though all they had to do to qualify for the quarterfinals was show up. The players were cocky, wasteful andlacking in concentration defensively, and for that, the fault must lie squarely at the feet of Arsenal’s coach.

Special thanks to Pellegrini for not blaming his players for or deflectingattention from City’s (admittedly) comprehensive defeat to Barcelona. It would be nice to see more coaches take responsibility for their part in their team’s failures, as well as theirsuccesses.

Join the Conversation

7 Comments

  1. Arsenal tied Monaco so I don’t think Monaco was the better team… I do think away goals is a good as any way of determining who goes through and all the coaches and teams know the rule…So that’s soccer.

  2. You are quire right about the importance of attitude. For too long English papers and television have pushed the fantasy that the EPL is the best league in the world. North American fans gets the same message tossed at us because the EPL is more available to our households than Serie A or La Liga or the Bundesliga. I’m sure EVERYONE thought Arsenal had drawn a cupcake in AS Monaco…the weakest team in the last 16…no respect for Ligue 1. Talk about inflated egos; well, it’s about time the Warren Barton’s of the world realize that English football is average, at best. Top-to-bottom the EPL is competitive, but so are 20 “C” students fighting for a “B” — competitive but not enough quality to be an “A”. The bottom of La Liga may not be as good as the bottom of the EPL, but the top teams in Spain are clearly better technically, tactically, and mentally than the EPL’s best; as are the top teams in Germany, in Italy, in France, and maybe even in Portugal. English football clubs are truly like the band U2 — not half as good as they think they are. Disappearance from Europe? — no surprise to me.

  3. English players, coaches, and there strategies don’t work. They have for years pushed athleticism, direct play and speed as virtues of soccer, particularly in the US. Unfortunately, people believe it in the US despite the actual record. Never has an English coach won the premier league, only once has won a world cup versus Latin countries, and have rarely had there players go abroad and succeed. But if you took at the teams that succeed in the Champions league, they are more technical and tactical.

  4. You are 99% correct cisco. 1% = not everyone believes that that is the only way to play.

  5. Cisco, good points… Tom you ALMOST have it right…Surely La Liga is superior, although with influx of Spain players in EPL the league is clearly strengthened… Tom and Cisco have the general idea correct… England hasn’t won anything in 50 years internationally, and they got lucky on home soil… and for some reason (is it that we share the language or is it that the English have a foothold in America?), American audiences truly are ignorant to the superiority of Spain… this has LONG (not 10 years, not 20 years, but LONG) been the case… any of you remember before EPL started importing foreigners to England that the English game was, as we used to call it in our youth “kick and run, chasing after the ball like chickens with their heads cut off”… It’s funny, if you say “the queen” to people here in the states, they think of the queen of England, as if it were their queen, same thing for football, a broad majority of those in the US think England is the extension of American football, the older brother or something… Tom made some good points, but interestingly, he believes the propaganda or holds the bias that he himself points out about others… he made the assumption that the lower teams in La Liga are not as good as the lower teams in EPL… clearly he doesn’t know La Liga and that “England is superior bias” has affected him at least in this regard… it really isn’t hard people, just get a subscription to BEIN Sports and you’ll see the best league in the world, that’s where you’ll find the weekly La Liga games including last week’s clasico that was played by Real Madrid and Barcelona… actually, the greatest generation of footballers is literally vanishing before our very eyes, don’t miss those that made history with Spain (a few in Madrid, more in Barca, and others from other clubs around Spain) and Barcelona… they are vanishing and aging before your very eyes… if you’re lucky, and you watch carefully for the next 2 months, you just might get to see Xavi, Iniesta and Busquets all playing together one last time… the first two were the world’s best ever midfield duet, and the the three were the best triplet… don’t… even though Xavi is aging, he was amazing in his 10 minute cameo in El Clasico last weekend

  6. David V:You hit the nail on the head. Vast majority of Americans who watch football watch the EPL and are blissfully unaware of La Liga being superior football as well as the fact that the bottom half of La Liga being superior to the bottom half of EPL. I would go further and say that at least half the teams in the EPL couldn’t cut it in Spain’s second division and I’m dead serious. I challenge anyone to view a match between two English bottom dwellers such as Stoke vs Hull and tell me in all seriousness that the football being played is anything but crude,primitive,clods huffing and puffing,getting “stuck in” and booting er’long with the skill level of an American high school team. When I watch American so-called commentators on Fox Sports state, as if reading from q-cards, that “top to bottom, the EPL is world’s best” or that Barcelona doesn’t have to go to “Stoke on a rainy Sunday night” I want to F-ing laugh.The top six La Liga clubs would wreak havoc with anything the English could throw their way and the worst team in Spain play better football than most of their vaunted EPL.

Leave a comment